Worst Company to work for - Technical Recruiter Varite Employee Review

1.0
May 26, 2023
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

There is nothing pro in this company Only since I know the director personally and working with him closely, I have come to an understanding of how this company works and to be honest its not good at all.

Cons

Recruiters are required to give their 100% with the minimum resources Forced Leaves, where employees are forced to take leave, if they don't have a leave balance then their salary is deducted - The reason for forced leave is The US market is on leave 1 Linkedin premium is shared by 4-5 recruiters with a maximum of just 100 credits for the entire team for the whole month 1 Indeed account for the entire team with 100 Credits Salary gets credited on 6th Limited views for Monster and Career Builder They say incentives are processed Quarterly, But we receive them after 6-7 Months There is no proper structure in the company Even the managers are told to recruit HR team responds after 2-3 repeated emails.

avatar
Varite Response
2y
Thanks, for the feedback. We shall take your feedback into consideration.

Explore other reviews about Varite

5.0
Nov 3, 2022
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Lots of opportunity to grow as in individual. Caring company culture with good peer to peer interactions. VARITE allows for individuals to get out of it what they put in. If you’re willing to put in the work they reward you very well as well as give you opportunities to move up the ladder and become a leader.

Cons

VARITE could have a more modernized training process.

1.0
Feb 16, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

I did not encounter any company practices that could be considered a pro.

Cons

My experience with this company has revealed several significant issues that prospective contractors and clients should be aware of: - Initial promises do not reflect long‑term treatment. They are attentive and accommodating at the start—particularly when securing a new contract or renewal—but that level of consideration quickly fades once the agreement is signed. - Lack of advocacy for employee growth. Despite consistently exceeding expectations at the client site for many years, the company made no effort to support appropriate title adjustments or rate alignment. Contract renewals were routinely presented with no changes in role title or compensation despite significant changes in responsibilities. - Minimal regard for both clients and contractors. Their primary focus appears to be maximizing profit and cutting costs, often at the expense of contractor experience and client satisfaction. - Cost‑driven approach to uniform requirements. Although they claim to follow the client’s uniform policies, approvals are handled in an extremely restrictive and cost‑focused manner, making it difficult to obtain what is actually required. - Uncompetitive benefits. The benefits offered are significantly below industry standards and do not provide meaningful value to employees.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All