Good Company - Inspector WSP Employee Review

5.0
Nov 16, 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Work is steady and they pay for all your expenses when traveling.

Cons

You must be available to work at the drop of a dime and this is only a part time job. This type of job is best for those that own their own business and can step away for a minimum of 14 days to 2 months at a time.

Explore other reviews about WSP

5.0
Jul 16, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Big company with projects all over the world

Cons

You must advocate for yourself always

3.0
Jul 20, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Travel to places you don't know they exist

Cons

1. Short notice to report to a field office (often within 24 hours) with little to no idea of what to expect, where you will be working, where you will stay, or how long your deployment will last. Work allocation is entirely management-driven, meaning you can sit without any assignments for months or even a year. 2. Unfair Quality Control: Quality control (QC) inspectors often create unnecessary friction. Reviews and corrections are frequently based on subjective bias or a complete lack of knowledge—such as out-of-state QC inspectors overriding local inspectors who actually understand the regional context and situation. 3. Deeply Inequitable Work Distribution: The process for assigning work lacks fairness. It is not uncommon to be released and sent home just a week after starting before you're getting up to speed—while new cohorts of inspectors continue to arrive for training. Internal Work Competition: QC inspectors who have been in the field for months are competing for active assignments when the workflow slows down.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All