employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Essential Access Health

Is this your company?

Essential Access Health reviews

2.9

37% would recommend to a friend

(24 total reviews)

Julie Rabinovitz

46% approve of CEO

30% positive business outlook

Essential Access Health has an employee rating of 2.9 out of 5 stars, based on 24 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have an average working experience there. The Essential Access Health employee rating is 20% below average for employers within the Government & Public Administration industry (3.6 stars).

Reviews by job title

24 reviews
2.0
Sep 20, 2014

Great staff hampered by very poor leadership

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The "old guard" is exceedingly knowledgeable and has a lot to give. If you're interested in reproductive health policy, this is an important organization.

Cons

Toxic, angry senior leadership that is unfocused and unallied with staff. Things get done through fear motivation rather than inspiration. Lots of needless gossip, drama and backstabbing, even to the point of sabotaging people. Poor competency with general operations.

1.0
Jun 20, 2014
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

This organization has an amazing staff that is really trying to make a difference and advance its mission. The staff is highly knowledgeable but sadly, the leadership fails to acknowledge, recognize and capitalize on their staff's knowledge. Beware of this before walking into a hyped-up position.

Cons

The working culture at CFHC is absolutely horrendous thanks to the toxic environment the senior leadership create. In my department, my supervisor didn't seem to not know how to say 'no' to the CEO. So in that regard, whatever request came down from the top, however unreasonable it was, that became the number one priority. Don't expect any sort of consistency. Priorities and tasks were often shifted immediately and the turn-around for tasks was extremely quick, making you wonder how these decisions were made. Often times things are assigned and then scrapped at the last minute which creates wasted energy and pointless work. If you try asking questions about strategy, expect to be made to feel inappropriate or dumb. This created an extremely uncomfortable and awkward space that prevented staff from speaking up and standing up for themselves especially when they were feeling abused. Most of the time the leadership had no idea what went into accomplishing some of these projects and failed to appreciate the work you put in. Much of the work that is assigned is very top-down and directive, rather than collaborative. Additionally, most of focus is to enhance the image of the organization rather than to actually further the mission. Very little of the work that I did at CFHC is something that I look at proudly and say it made a difference. In fact, the work that did have meaning to me were the projects that my boss asked me to put on the back-burner leaving me to doubt her competency in her position. On a side note regarding lack of professionalism, my supervisor had a habit of feeling the need to gossip about partner organizations and colleagues in racially and culturally insensitive ways which obviously would lead a person to wonder what was said about you after leaving the room.Overall, I would recommend staying away from this place unless you don't have any good ideas and don't care. The positions tend to be hyped up with fancy buzzwords, but don't really mean anything in practice. Advancement and growth opportunities are minimal. Many of the staff that have worked there for a while talk about a time before the current CEO was in leadership as a positive place to work that was family-friendly, flexible and welcoming. Unfortunately, the current CEO has brought with her a toxic work environment that is reinforced by the leadership she has hired.

1.0
Jun 1, 2014
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

I left CFHC after being employed for less than a year between 2013-2014. 1. Talented and hard-working employees, many of whom are well established in reproductive health 2. Lots of challenging and exciting projects in research, public policy, STD prevention and consumer awareness

Cons

Within my team: 1. My manager had unrealistic expectations and demands when considering the size of her staff, which led our team members being constantly overwhelmed and stressed. 2. Meanwhile, team priorities constantly shifted without valid explanation. A decision would be made, our team would scramble to follow through and then the project would just be scrapped at the end. This is an ineffective use of staff time. 3. Moreover, my supervisor was a micromanager, which resulted in an excessive amount of back and forth and was extremely inefficient. As a result, it created a toxic culture where staff aren't trusted to do what they were hired to do. Company-wide: 1. Salaries/benefits package are not competitive (even when compared to other non-profits of the same size). 2. Very high turnover rate across all departments. Of those who left, a large number was at CFHC for less than 1-2 years. This caused priorities to continually shift to remaining employees and the hiring process for replacement(s) was slow. 3. No budget (or very limited budget) for conferences and training, which is a strong indication that the company doesn't really invest in its employees. It's not surprising that there's also limited opportunities for growth.

Viewing 19 - 21 of 24 Reviews

Glassdoor has 27 Essential Access Health reviews submitted anonymously by Essential Access Health employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Essential Access Health is right for you.