Exponent reviews

3.0

37% would recommend to a friend

(360 total reviews)
avatar

Catherine Corrigan

34% approve of CEO

35% positive business outlook

Exponent has an employee rating of 3.0 out of 5 stars, based on 360 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have an average working experience there. The Exponent employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Management & Consulting industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

360 reviews
2.0
Jul 11, 2020
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

1) The base salary is good, not excellent, however raises and bonuses are minimal and you will work long hours. 2) You'll work with the latest and greatest technology/ideas from a vast array of different companies. 3) Every single day is different in terms of what you'll be doing which makes the overall job supremely interesting. Some of the tasks themselves on the other hand aren't so interesting.

Cons

1) Nettlesome work environment. Coworkers are the competition with whom you will compete on performance metrics which of course translates to receiving (or not receiving!) bonuses, raises, and promotions. Problematically, coworkers are ALSO the ones from whom you are supposed to find work. It is a total conflict of interest—asking to get work from those with whom you compete. Because work does not come directly from clients, there is an extremely limited pool of people from whom you can get work and they aren’t inclined to give it to you for sake of their own interests unless they have extra (“work hoarding” happens during slow times of the year). If you don't manage to find any work, it counts against you so you'll either be trying to find work or have too much work to do which is extremely stressful. I have also witnessed lots of back-stabbing, credit-stealing and petty games going on due to the competitive work environment coupled with fake smiles. This is the number one reason working at Exponent is difficult. Instead of the traditional business model of having a boss hand down work or even having a team that all has a common goal, you will be expected to find your own work *internally* and work with people who are working against you. 2) Unchallenging science. Often the type of tasks that are done for projects are tedious, simple things. Frequently the work performed does not require a PhD whatsoever. This can seem like a plus to not have to do super cognitively-demanding tasks, but then one realizes they’re mostly doing a myriad of tiresome and unexciting tasks. Over time, while you’ll work with the latest technology in industry, your own personal hard-earned skills as a scientist will wane. There is some opportunity to be creative in how to tackle particular tasks. 3) Finally, this isn't really a long-term job. You’ll become a jack of *many* trades but master of none. You do whatever work comes in and you will like it (or you can quit!). Some projects are legitimately interesting, others are not, but that is the nature of consulting work—Exponent will take any project no matter how meaningless it is as long as it helps pay the bills. If one expects to specialize and become a true expert at something (which a PhD student is typically driven to do) you do not want to stay at Exponent and instead apply to a company that specifically does the type of work you want to do. There is no passion for the work here at this company, it's all about the money. Why else would PhD graduates forego pursuing topics of their own interest in an academic setting other than being offered a lot more money than what an academic position would offer? Notice that most of the company is filled with younger employees despite being around since the 60’s and you’ll realize the turnover rate must be high—it’s also why they’re constantly recruiting and trying to hire. I don't get the sense they're overly interested in retaining talent so much as just finding new talent. It's alarming that fresh PhD students are the targets for recruitment rather than seasoned professionals.

avatar
Exponent Response
5y
The development of our consulting staff is one of the highest priority initiatives across the firm from top (Board, CEO, Officers) to the staff level. We expect employees to own their own development and there are many, varied paths forward. And we provide them with training, programs and processes that are continuously evolving to support them on their paths. Whether it is participation in our Buddy, Mentoring or Sponsorship Programs or online and classroom training or informal development through on-the-job exposure to a wide variety of challenging problems and client interactions, this is a top priority. We have a total compensation philosophy that is based on pay for performance. Performance is measured across three equally critical expectations of Professional, Business/Client and Leadership/Teamwork.
1.0
Oct 6, 2019
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Some colleagues are incredibly nice, smart, and driven.

Cons

- Work life balance is awful. The higher ups are obsessed with billing at all costs, even at the expense of family life. Work on nights and weekends is very common, if not expected. Most people in the company have terrible work life balance. - The best people seem to leave after a few years. Unfortunately, that means the ones remaining who make it to the top are not the best people you want leading the company. - Senior management acts like everyone can make it to the top and nobody leaves. Instead, there's an obvious high attrition rate and very very few people make it to the top level. But unlike other consulting companies that embrace the "up or out" theory, Exponent seems to pretend that attrition doesn't exist. - Senior management tends to be good at one thing: billing. They have very little actual management skills and are terrible at growing the "lower level" employees' careers. - The company seems to be obsessed with short term returns. They don't care about long term growth of people or the company, only quarter by quarter. This is a really bad long term strategy. - Lots of market credit stealing and taking advantage of young, fresh PhD grads. Unfair system for reward. - The obsession with billing means you will do anything to bill more, even if the tasks are really simple and low level. This means all the technical skills people have developed in their PhDs just erode over time. This is REALLY bad for your long term career.

2.0
Sep 12, 2016
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The Construction Consulting practice has a diverse office, with a refreshingly large number of women in management positions. There is ample access to industry experts with opportunities for informal mentoring (Exponent's mentoring program only accepts employees with 2 years at the company). Depending on the contracts assigned, work schedules are fairly flexible, though this not always the case for entry-level employees. Working from home is acceptable, when approved beforehand. Good project experience for recent graduates, although the day-to-day tasks are dull and repetitive. Paid overtime, however management treats this as a "bonus", which it is not.

Cons

Since the company is publicly traded, management is primarily concerned with revenue, and treats all other aspects of business as extraneous. Junior employees are commanded to achieve unreasonably high billable hours / total hours (utilization), to the detriment of 'overhead' activities. These include professional (licenses/certifications, industry groups/society meetings and conferences, publications) and people development (mentoring/training, team building, career planning). These activities are expected to be addressed off of the clock, with minimal impact to the employee's utilization. This results in entry level employees being "nose to the grindstone" at all times, with little time to give to business development, recruiting, research opportunities, or even work with other practices. Meanwhile, senior management is allowed to have low utilization because of business development efforts, but since the organization is so top heavy, this affects the profit margin of the practice adversely, and directors admonish us to get utilization back up. Overtime is required at the Associate and Senior Associate level; lower level employees always work on multiple projects, but are also expected to support any random request that a manager sends along. This is not well communicated at the outset, but becomes integral to promotion and is used as the basis for raises and bonuses. The promotion cycle is strictly once a year, and is not a 360 review. Management does round tables to discuss lower level employees, and awards raises and bonuses based on the cumulative opinion of the worker. This a very subjective process that allows personal perception to outweigh technical performance. As long as utilization is high and the employee is seen by most managers as a team player, hard worker, and client pleaser, a small reward is given. Raises are not generous (1-3%), and bonuses are based off of revenue (~10% of base salary if you get one). Junior employees rarely get projects assigned to them, so little revenue is attributed to them, so bonuses are usually modest, too. Base compensation is not considered competitive by most employees in the practice, including managers. Negotiate salary before accepting; if your number is outside of their range for a position, they may offer you a higher level position if you have the requisite experience. The practice has very high turnover (12 people in 2 years). Reasons given that pertain to the company: dislike of the major client, little room for advancement, unsatisfactory management style, and dislike of daily duties. The Construction Consulting practice has an unhealthy work environment for junior employees, as they are treated as chattel to be traded among projects as needed. Due to the high turnover, these transitions occur frequently, and are usually too quick and not well communicated to the client. Associates are expected to onboard new hires and train new employees while continuing to manage their usual tasks, while also participating in recruiting efforts and addressing ad hoc requests. There is little respect given to schedule or current commitments. Feedback, when given directly rather than passed down the chain to a supervisor, is laced with inappropriate observations about personality and character disguised as career advice. Upper management is extremely absent, and fosters no relationship with lower level employees. Management laments the high turnover and low morale, but takes no action to improve the work environment or give space for employee feedback.

Viewing 10 - 12 of 360 Reviews

Glassdoor has 400 Exponent reviews submitted anonymously by Exponent employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Exponent is right for you.