Fuse Integration reviews

3.5

48% would recommend to a friend

(29 total reviews)

Sumner Lee

68% approve of CEO

45% positive business outlook

Fuse Integration has an employee rating of 3.5 out of 5 stars, based on 29 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Fuse Integration employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Aerospace & Defense industry (3.6 stars).

Reviews by job title

29 reviews
2.0
May 10, 2023
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Pay, flexibility, some people are very good at their job

Cons

Very poor middle management, poor communication, contradictory direction.

avatar
Fuse Integration Response
3y
Thank you for your feedback and for taking the time to leave a review. Fuse continues to refine how we are communicating upcoming milestones, goals, and direction to our rapidly growing team, which we understand can be a challenge in a fast-paced and agile development environment. We have placed renewed attention on ensuring plans are synthesized, well-promulgated, and readily available. We are also allowing more time and mentorship for new team members to assimilate, and we have implemented a review cycle focused on goal setting with a flexible frequency level that can be adapted to fit the needs of individual team members. As we continue to grow, we will keep these front of mind while responding to and solving more complex challenges for the fleet with a focus on designing for the user.
2.0
May 27, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The individual contributors and engineering managers are genuinely talented, hardworking people who care about their work and each other. If you’re early in your career, there are real learning opportunities and good mentorship at the peer and manager level. The technical work itself is engaging, and working with the warfighters is rewarding.

Cons

Leadership is failing this company, and most engineers know it. The core problem is the business model. Leadership wins contracts by promising fast and cheap. While they spin it as a competitive advantage, the cost is being paid by the engineers delivering the work. Nights, weekends, personal sacrifices. Seemingly endless sprints aren’t the exception, they’re the norm. That’s not a growth strategy, it’s a slow bleed. You can only burn through so many people before the talent walks and the reputation follows. Engineering isn’t involved in the RFP process, which means unrealistic timelines are baked in before engineers even know the project exists. “Decentralized decision-making” is something leadership says, not something they do. In practice, decisions funnel through the top regardless of who the actual SME is. Engineering managers are not empowered to make final decisions within their own domain, and the engineers/ICs beneath them aren’t either. The people closest to the work have the least say in how it gets done. Accountability is applied selectively. When engineering drops the ball, it’s loud and public. When the problem traces back to another department, it quietly disappears. People notice. There is a visible nepotism problem. A number of long-tenured employees have accumulated seniority and promotions that are difficult to reconcile with their actual qualifications. Rather than being held accountable, they continue to advance and hire direct reports to absorb the work everyone around them knows they can’t do. Engineering sees it clearly. Leadership either doesn’t or doesn’t care. The all-hands meetings are a biweekly reminder of how disconnected senior leadership is from the daily reality of their people. Attendance is low because ICs who are grinding don’t want to sit through a polished performance that glosses over the very problems they’re living. You can tell a lot by who shows up in person. Nothing illustrated the disconnect more clearly than the first meeting back after the end of year review. Bonuses and raises had been generally low across the company. Then, the first major announcement back was that upper management had promoted themselves from Directors to VPs. Even if it was a title change only, the timing and optics were abysmal. They chose to celebrate themselves at a time when company morale was approaching all-time lows. You can’t manufacture that kind of tone-deafness.

avatar
Fuse Integration Response
1mo
Thank you for sharing this feedback. Your comments show how much you care about the company’s direction. We appreciate your perspective and we continuously strive to improve our processes while we meet warfighter needs.
2.0
Sep 27, 2023

Inch deep and a mile wide.

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

If you are on the engineering side you might get a chance to work in a fairly fast paced environment with some quality coworkers so things don't typically get stale. Pay and benefits are ok. Unlimited PTO after 2 years is good unless you consider the average tenure at Fuse, based on LinkedIn data, to be 1.9 years, in which case maybe it's not really worth what it seems at first....seems to be a theme here.

Cons

Zero structure to projects. If you want to work on something that resembles a college level group project this is your place maybe. Management keeps everyone in complete darkness bordering on dishonesty. To add to the problems, management seems to have little or no interest actually managing the projects beyond lip service and slogans so it's little wonder that the company is simply unable to grow out of its small startup phase and has even gone through recent layoffs. Looking at previous reviews and similar feedback it looks like none of this is recent developments so little hope for future change unless there's some major overhaul. Management seems more interested in responding to Glassdoor reviews than its employees direct feedback which makes these responses pretty disingenuous.

avatar
Fuse Integration Response
2y
Thank you for taking the time to share your thoughts with us. While we strive for a culture where everyone has a positive experience, we realize our fast-paced and agile development environment isn’t the right fit for everyone. We appreciate hearing your concerns and we will take them into account as we continue to grow the company.
Viewing 7 - 9 of 29 Reviews

Glassdoor has 30 Fuse Integration reviews submitted anonymously by Fuse Integration employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Fuse Integration is right for you.