General Mills reviews

4.0

80% would recommend to a friend

(3,881 total reviews)
avatar

Jeff Harmening

81% approve of CEO

63% positive business outlook

General Mills has an employee rating of 4.0 out of 5 stars, based on 3,881 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The General Mills employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Manufacturing industry (3.5 stars).

Reviews by job title

4K reviews
5.0
Dec 12, 2016

Highly Ethical and Purpose Driven

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Opportunity to grow as a leader in a best practice environment with incredibly smart, talented colleagues. This is a company that truly is invested in "doing the right thing all the time", one of its core values. It is the home of large, iconic brands like Cheerios, Nature Valley, Pillsbury and Betty Crocker and Hagen Daz (outside of the US), but also features smaller natural/organic brands like Larabar, Annie's, Food Should Taste Good and Cascadian Farms. A great place to work for a global company and learn how to run a business and build brands from one of the very best operators in the industry.

Cons

The company is highly matrixed (like most in the industry) and team oriented - not a great fit if you are not strong at collaboration.

1.0
Jan 13, 2016
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The non management people are great.

Cons

Mid level manager have become so cut throat it is unbelievable. It is a cut or be cut environment. Definitely a good ol boy network from the top down. If you work in infrastructure you are protected from the top down. The CIO and management under him is a joke.

3.0
Sep 8, 2017
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Applies to Minneapolis (I didn’t work in the plants): whip smart line employees (sub-manager), a real recognition company-wide that things aren’t working, some leaders are willing to cut the BS and get results, generally a progressive HR and a desire to be a good company. Very entrepreneurial within limits. If you can build and keep consensus you’ll go far. If you can’t, don’t even apply. Strong institutional history. Cutting edge marketing thinking in many ways. A scary-smart R&D function.

Cons

The rotation culture stunts the company. The needless movement of employees is like a Bonsai artist trimming anything growing. The rotation system kills institutional memory, limits an employee’s ability to see a project through to sustainability, incentivizes rampant careerism, and ensures you’re always focused on the next role to the detriment of your current role. My “2 year rotations” were as follows: 18 months, 6 months, 9 months, 14 months. I gave up mastering the job; what was the point? Most marketing-related employees abandon any notion of deep competency and strive only for shallow short-term wins. Every year they’re either rotating or getting a new boss. 1 quarter out of every 4 is focused on reacting to turnover. The path to promotion is gaming the rotation system. Since your projects won’t be judged 2 years down the line on efficacy, you only need worry about their visibility at launch. If your idea is flawed, the failure becomes the next person’s responsibility. The prior employee’s systems are adopted regardless of whether they were effective. You might do better with the rotations. It’s possible to leverage them into career success. I just couldn’t live with how they killed company performance over the years I worked there. Most glaring is that current leadership is rarely impacted through 3 layoffs.

Viewing 10 - 12 of 3,881 Reviews

Glassdoor has 5,158 General Mills reviews submitted anonymously by General Mills employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if General Mills is right for you.