Georgia-Pacific reviews

3.7

68% would recommend to a friend

(3,044 total reviews)
avatar

David Duncan

100% approve of CEO

54% positive business outlook

Georgia-Pacific has an employee rating of 3.7 out of 5 stars, based on 3,044 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Georgia-Pacific employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Manufacturing industry (3.5 stars).

Reviews by job title

3K reviews
4.0
Dec 18, 2015

Director

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

ability to set your own career path, if skilled they provide the flexibility to move roles and gain broad range of experiences. Strong senior leadership, clear vision for company, MBM provides good guidance when properly understood.

Cons

Corporate can be slow and bureaucratic, particularly support roles or capabilities not tied closely to a business or P&L. Flexibility to define job responsibility and set your own career path can result in unclear roles or expectations. No visibility to incentive pay calculations. Tied to "value creation", where employees are expected to define how much value they created each year. The flexibility is intended to allow managers to reward top performers, looking holistically instead of only judging on a few metrics. In practice, incentives seem arbitrary - often lacking any clear justification for why a certain amount was awarded. The disconnect between performance and compensation creates a disincentive for strong performers.

1.0
Oct 31, 2015
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

This review is for the Consumer Products division of GP. Pros: 1. Market Based Management (MBM) in it's essence is an outstanding management philosophy, and the problem solving tools are great. Learning MBM was the best part of my time at GP; I use it every day in some way. 2. The location of my position with GP was a plus; the company headquarters is in downtown Atlanta. (This is one of the reasons I stayed) 3. Depending on the department, there was general flexibility to work from home from time to time. 4. Salaries are a lot less than other consumer packaged goods companies, but has a good 401K plan. I stayed long enough for mine to vest and then left.

Cons

For those with exposure to other CPG companies, GP will probably be several beneath what is considered best in class in the CPG industry. It is an arrogant, controlling, manipulative cult-like culture and the company seems to not care at all about it's employees or their working environment. Being at GP felt like stepping back into the 1970s. From the decor of the office (masking tape colored paint & cubicles, severely worn carpet with holes and stains all through out, etc.) to the attitudes of people. Leaders did not have patience with freedom of thought. As a manager I couldn't buy a simple book for my team's development and give it to them without HR first reviewing the book to make sure it lined up with MBM. Cronyism abounded and people who were more senior levels Senior Dir./VP level would assign their friends to positions without posting positions or even when the freind had no applicable experience. This was all done without any accountability by HR or SVP level simply by twisting MBM principles to justify the choice. In fact, leaders would often twist MBM and use it to manipulate or justify dysfunctional behavior, yet their managers were not holding them accountable for MBM. Sadly, I noticed that those who had spent their career with GP have no idea how horrible the environment is there. Also, unlike other CPG companies, there seemed to be no desire at GP consumer products to strive to be number one (or do signifcantly better in the industry). There were issues happened year after year that eroded customer relationships and tarnished GPs reputation, but the departments causing the issues were not required to fix them. Also GP consumer products seemed to never have enough of what they needed to meet business requirements (customer demand), so it was a constant shell game which made every work week issue-filled with execution. GP did not have simple, routine standard operating procedures across the company (which in this day and age is absolutely ridiculous).

1.0
Feb 26, 2014

PHONEY and OVERRATED

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

You'll be lured to GP with a great starting salary, subsidized transportation, a downtown location, and the promise of MBM (respect, value creation, challenge process....). Will look good on your resume.

Cons

Your expectations will be dashed. No annual cost-of living raise, and most promotions don't include a raise. Horrifying micromanagement that will suck the joy out of your job and the life right out of you. The MBM guidelines, if actually implemented, would be awesome. But, GP management only talks about MBM it doesn't actually walk it. Management wants you to think GP isn't like other huge corporations, that they hold themselves to a higher standard called MBM guiding principles. However, once you get here, you find out its just as bad or worse than other companies, GP just hides it better at first. If you do challenge an idea in a meeting, be prepared to have it show up on your review. Respect and integrity, though part of MBM principles, is phoney and counterfeit.

Viewing 19 - 21 of 3,044 Reviews

Glassdoor has 3,308 Georgia-Pacific reviews submitted anonymously by Georgia-Pacific employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Georgia-Pacific is right for you.