HIPR reviews

2.4

25% would recommend to a friend

(156 total reviews)

19% positive business outlook

HIPR has an employee rating of 2.4 out of 5 stars, based on 156 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have an average working experience there. The HIPR employee rating is 37% below average for employers within the Human Resources & Staffing industry (3.8 stars).

Reviews by job title

156 reviews
1.0
Aug 15, 2021
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

You get to help people overcome the challenging and sometimes arbitrary US immigration policies. In my experience, my coworkers have been supportive and kind, especially when dealing with our unfair working conditions.

Cons

Pay and benefits are subpar: Management seems to be committed to giving their workers as little as possible. Do you live in a state where paid sick leave isn't mandated? Then don't expect management to give you any paid sick leave--but someone in your same position, who lives in a state with mandated paid sick leave, will have this benefit. Management also withholds benefits for as long as possible--not giving you any much-needed benefits, such as health insurance, during your probationary period. They seem to expect their employees to have the privileges of being on a family member's existing healthcare plan or of living with roommates/family to be able to afford living expenses. Workload is very high: The firm has retained more clients than it has capacity to have. For years, employees have raised concerns, and for years, management has disregarded these concerns and implemented seemingly reactionary and short sighted policies. For instance, in 2020, rather than assure employees of extended/indefinite WFH during the pandemic, management unrolled a "WFH Benefits Program," which required that writers promise to do at least one extra project a week in order to have indefinite WFH. At the same time, management also seemed to drag their feet with extending WFH, which caused unnecessary stress among workers. Management also dangles bonuses as a way to justify offering low base salaries--but this means that you will have to take on hours of extra work in order to make ends meet. However, these bonus opportunities have dwindled since management started hiring independent contractors from their other company, Talentopia; management seems to claim that these independent contractors are meant to "help" the writing department with workloads, but because independent contractors are poorly trained and have no incentive to produce quality work, their projects add to the editing workload of Team Leads and Team Lead Assistants while draining possible bonus opportunities for writers, which leaves writers with limited opportunities to supplement their low wages at the company. Upward mobility is more of a punishment than a reward: Management also has unclear policies with regards to promotions. Some writers are hired as "Writer - Team Lead track" while others aren't. Team Leads have immensely high workloads, which leads to extreme burn out, so if you're a writer and don't want the stress of client complaints and unclear communication between departments or even from management when they unroll a new policy with barely any notice, then you can maybe get Senior Writer, but this promotion also comes with the threat of demotion. If you don't hit a certain performance metric on KPI, the company's confusing and arbitrary performance measurement system, then you lose the extra income of Senior Writer. Also, as Senior Writer, you are given the most challenging cases, often with little reprieve. In short, you are punished for doing your job well, but you are also punished when you struggle with completing an exuberantly high workload (by being disqualified from monthly bonuses based on an arbitrary and clouded KPI system). Favoritism leads to little accountability for fair treatment: If management likes you, you might have an okay time at Hudson. But if they don't, they will overlook you for promotions or give you lower bonuses, or deny you raises or other requests. They also offer people different starting wages and do not have a transparent pay scale to keep them accountable for fair treatment. Lack of transparent policies cause confusion and sometimes chaos within and across departments: Management often makes changes on filing strategies of I-140 and I-129 cases based on a single client complaint. They also recently rolled out a new project management system to "help" Team Leads, called PMS much to almost everyone's dismay, with very little warning and blamed others for its hasty launch and its poor reception among workers. Further, there is no clear grievance policy, so you never know if your next mistake will also be your last. These non-transparent policies keep employees on edge and take up precious work time to try to sort out rather than attend to the case preparation of our clients.

1.0
Aug 15, 2021
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- You get the opportunity to set your own work schedule within certain limits. - You are able to help people directly and see the results of quality work. - My direct supervisor is extremely helpful and patient.

Cons

- The pay is laughable and is not adjusted for cost of living. It is shameful that I meet the American Bar Association's definition of a paralegal yet cannot afford most studio apartments. - The pay and position duties are misrepresented in job ads and in initial meetings with recruiters. - Management is disorganized and lacks professionalism. - Management surveils employees constantly and retaliates against those who try to improve working conditions. - Morale is extremely low.

1.0
Aug 15, 2021

a pit of despair

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

You will be paid (poorly) for your work. You will even receive the bare minimum of benefits mandated by law for full-time employees in your state.

Cons

I wish I could give this company 0 stars. I wish I could give it *negative* stars. As a prospective employee, your first introduction to the company will probably be confusion about what “the company” actually is, where your paychecks will be coming from, and who you are actually working for. “Hudson” is just one piece of a confusing web of corporate entities that generally operate in the area of immigration law but may also be involved in everything from software development to professional staffing. Even after working here for five years, I couldn’t tell you how it all fits together. On its own, a confusing corporate structure wouldn’t be too bad, but that’s only where the problems with Hudson begin. Easily the worst thing about Hudson is its management. The managers/owners of the company are very distant. They make decisions without any input from the rest of the staff and implement massive changes to workflow, company policies, and personnel with little to no warning. Working here, you never know what element of your job will suddenly change dramatically. But when those changes do arrive, you can be sure that you won’t be warned or given any time to adjust. There is also no middle management to speak of. Management communicates through the HR department, but they exercise absolute control over all aspects of the business. From a business standpoint, this seems like a huge waste of everyone’s time because every major decision and problem has to get kicked upstairs to an inscrutable and often difficult to reach managing body. It doesn’t seem possible for a company to be both over-managed and under-managed at the same time, but that’s exactly how it feels. In short, the employees are underpaid, overworked, understaffed, given inadequate training, and expected to deal with the capricious whims of a management apparatus that does not communicate with them and does not care about their wellbeing. It is shameful and it is completely untenable.

Viewing 52 - 54 of 156 Reviews

Glassdoor has 164 HIPR reviews submitted anonymously by HIPR employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if HIPR is right for you.