Hanover Research reviews

3.6

66% would recommend to a friend

(320 total reviews)
avatar

Wes Givens

54% approve of CEO

44% positive business outlook

Hanover Research has an employee rating of 3.6 out of 5 stars, based on 320 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Hanover Research employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Management & Consulting industry (3.6 stars).

Reviews by job title

320 reviews
1.0
Feb 10, 2016
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Interesting work, interesting clients. I'm proud of the work that I did, and because we were so drastically understaffed (because profit was always the most important thing) I got to do a lot of work that was probably more senior than I should have been, giving me a lot of experience and room to grow.

Cons

No professional development, poor work/life balance, lack of respect from senior management

avatar
Hanover Research Response
10y
Thank you for your feedback. I am sorry to read that you didn't enjoy your time at Hanover. I could not tell from your post when you worked at Hanover but I can confirm that we have only hired Grants Consultants with a track record of wins for external clients for the past 3 years. Most of our Grants Consultants work remotely and this has helped with managing work-life balance more effectively. Our GCs have the opportunity to present their work at national conferences each year and they are invited to speak at industry events regularly. It is difficult to offer more than this in terms of professional development to individuals who are already at the top of their profession.
2.0
Aug 15, 2017

Associate

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

If you're taking on a role at Hanover as a newly minted grad, the company offers a fairly decent work-life balance for entry-level positions. Most roles neatly fit into regular business hours (8-4 or 9-5), which gives you plenty of free time outside of work. If you tough it out on 30-40 k for the first couple of years, it is very likely that you'll be promoted and offered an opportunity to manage research teams in due course. Also, tenured staff can benefit from rapid company growth since the portfolio of client assignments keeps expanding.

Cons

Too many to consider staying at Hanover long-term. Entry-level research, strategy and business development roles are nothing more than repetitive and mind-numbing tasks that could easily be carried out by administrative assistants with high school degrees. As one of the other reviews pointed out, primary research is just window dressing for day-to-day cold calling and digging out confidential company information from Linkedin contacts over the phone. Granted, professional development opportunities are offered to all employees on a regular basis, but very few of these actually help you become a more effective employee. It is debatable whether - if at all - specific training opportunities translate to, say, higher weekly sales, better rapport with clients etc. Another pervasive issue that I couldn't help but notice is the lack of transparent performance ratings. Entry-level associates typically receive a set of scores for each specific project they work on. That said, certain assessment categories are overly vague and highly subjective, which makes it hard to tell how well you are doing compared to other employees in the same role. Because of this, it is not unusual to do exceptionally well in one project and completely fail in another one. On that note, your personal success in certain roles (such as primary research) might just be a matter of luck since it depends on how many people pick up the phone or express interest in market research. Even if you work at the company for several years, your professional success might essentially just boil down to how you come across on the phone. I have personally seen first-hand a couple of people getting fired/laid off (or magically disappearing) within the first couple of months, which calls your own job security into question. As for the overall company culture, the good ole boys frat ethos is alive and well - very few top-ranking employees are women or minorities, and it is astounding how slowly this is changing. Tight social cliques across virtually all practice areas make it difficult to get to know your co-workers better, since folks fall back on their alumni networks and rarely branch out to other teams. Although there is a whole slew of buzzwords floating around that suggest openness to employee feedback and participation, the firm structure appears to be fairly rigidly hierarchical - entry-level employees are basically cogs in the machine. Company turnover remains very high and this most certainly reflects badly on Hanover's reputation.

avatar
Hanover Research Response
8y
Thank you for your feedback. It is true that we ensure that entry-level employees are trained thoroughly, both for their own development and to ascertain that we are delivering high-quality product to our clients. This necessarily involves repetitions on tasks and projects. It is also true that primary research, by definition, is collecting information through a variety of different methods, including over the phone. We are very transparent about this expectation of the role during the hiring process, just as we are insistent that all our research processes meet the highest ethical standards. Regarding performance ratings: It is not at all unusual for entry-level employees to receive divergent ratings on different projects; it is part of the development process. We are quite proud of our training and performance management infrastructure, and I am sorry those didn’t meet your expectations. We have become one of the fastest growing market research firms in the country because we are very selective about hiring the best talent and giving them lots of opportunities to grow and develop. Our retention rates are better than the industry average, but occasionally – as happens in every firm – there is no longer a fit between the role and the employee. I can assure you, though, that no one “magically disappears”. If you take a look at the company’s leadership page, you will notice that 4 of the 10 people listed are women and/or people of color. There is always more work for us to do here, but we are very proud of the diversity in our workforce.
2.0
Nov 15, 2015

Senior Research Associate

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Ability to work on many different projects. Friendly coworkers and supervisors. Fast paced working environment. Opportunity to grow.

Cons

Mundane work. Low pay for amount of work required and DC cost of life. Minimal benefits and holidays. Growth for growth's sake.

avatar
Hanover Research Response
10y
Thank you for your feedback. I would disagree with your statement about our benefits and holidays. Hanover offers 18 days of PTO in an employee's first year of employment, and an additional day for each year of service thereafter. Unused PTO rolls over year over year so that staff can take extended vacation if they wish. We offer 6 weeks of paid maternity leave and subsidize health and dental insurance so that employees are contributing less than 15% of the premiums each month. The research role can be challenging for some individuals. It requires a researcher to be able to work independently on a project for 8-9 hours a day until the project is completed. For some individuals, this type of structured, independent work can be tedious and lack diversity but for individuals who enjoy the variety of the projects, the quick turnaround nature of our projects and ability to take full ownership of a product from start to finish, this role is ideal.
Viewing 22 - 24 of 320 Reviews

Glassdoor has 332 Hanover Research reviews submitted anonymously by Hanover Research employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Hanover Research is right for you.