Health Catalyst reviews

3.3

44% would recommend to a friend

(784 total reviews)
avatar

Ben Albert

28% approve of CEO

24% positive business outlook

Health Catalyst has an employee rating of 3.3 out of 5 stars, based on 784 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Health Catalyst employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Healthcare industry (3.4 stars).

Reviews by job title

784 reviews
5.0
Feb 26, 2021

Incredible Company, People and Culture

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

There is meaningful work, respect among team members and I feel valued. HC also makes efforts to support equality.

Cons

I have no cons to list. HC is a growing company and experiences some growing pains, which is normal.

avatar
Health Catalyst Response
5y
Thank you for this review, advice and feedback, and thank you for your 3+ years of service at Health Catalyst. I find your advice insightful and resonant, and we'll work consistently to keep the mission-oriented culture at the center, which includes keeping team member engagement at the center of all we do. And we'll dig into ways we can improve regarding not micro-managing, while also working to scale operationally as well. I appreciate your patience and understanding along the way, as I'm confident we will be imperfect and make mistakes. But we'll keep the focus on the mission, the operating principles and cultural attributes, which include a sub-statement that "we don't micromanage" and try to live up to these principles each day. Thank you again for your contributions and commitment. Best, Dan
2.0
Feb 23, 2021
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- Good work life balance. It is easy to take time off and long hours typically aren’t necessary unless you seek it out. If you want a comfortable job where you can coast and get promoted over a long period of time, this is great. However, PTO policy is becoming less generous. -Job security is good. Sacrifices were made, but no one was laid off during covid. In general, there doesn't seem to be many layoffs. It seems very difficult to get fired. - It is a low pressure and non competitive environment that allows you to avoid stress if you want to. - Decent monthly reimbursement benefits for phone and internet. Education reimbursement is also good if you want to further your education. - I’ve met some great teammates and am lucky to have a great manager. The office was fun when it was open.

Cons

- Lots of nepotism and favoritism. As an outsider, it was shocking to learn how many employees are someone’s family member or friend beforehand. If you don’t have an “in”, it can be intimidating and overwhelming to work in an environment where there is a heavy bias towards favorites. - Working hard or coasting doesn’t make a difference. I’ve seen plenty of both and the extra work is appreciated but not often rewarded. Job titles and compensation do not reflect ability or productivity. - Benefits and raises have been cut or suspended. While sacrifice is understandable during these times, we are constantly acquiring companies and hiring external employees. There doesn't seem to be a heavy investment in the existing employees who have sacrificed. - Diversity is more or less an advertising initiative and a way to pat our backs. This company is not diverse in its actual culture or the way people are respected. - When joining, I thought I was joining a company with cutting edge technology. In reality, the technology is fairly uninspiring.

avatar
Health Catalyst Response
5y
Thank you for sharing your perspective and feedback about working at Health Catalyst since you joined less than a year ago. I'm sorry to read about the negative experience you've had these past several months, and that a number of elements of the job and the company have not measured up to your expectations. Any time a team member has a negative experience, one that does not measure up to our potential, I feel regret and disappointment. And I hope we should each feel a desire to learn from these experiences and feedback, and then strive to understand what we can do to improve. I agree with your feedback about the importance of recognizing hard work and extra effort. While we at Health Catalyst have designed a compensation framework that is favorable for every team member, and assumes that every team member is meaningfully contributing to the company's success and should therefore be recognized with above-market compensation, we also have mechanisms in place to additionally recognize extraordinary performance. But these additional mechanisms typically manifest themselves over longer periods of time than just the first year of employment at Health Catalyst. For example, our annual equity grants to team members are a meaningful part of every team member's compensation who has been with Health Catalyst for at least one year, and the default grant value is designed to contribute to overall compensation that is above-market. There is also an individual-performance component in determining the grant size that includes the up-sizing of grants to recognize extraordinary performance, and approximately 20% of team members, those who have demonstrated extraordinary performance, receive an upsized equity grant during that annual process, and this can have significant incremental value. As team members consistently demonstrate this extraordinary performance, they can also qualify for promotions at a more rapid pace than the default timeline of once every 3-5 years. Our efforts regarding diversity are another area where sustained, consistent effort over many years yields meaningful improvement and progress, but it takes time to see the fruits of this effort. As we have discussed several times in all-team-member meetings, we have sustained an effort now, in a focused way, for the past seven years, in improving the female team member experienece at Health Catalyst. We have studied the data, striven to learn from it, implemented initiatives that took time to take effect, and built an infrastructure around strengthening this experience for female team members over time. And we have seen meaningful progress in terms of pay equity (we have achieve near-perfect pay parity), in the number of women to apply for positions at Health Catalyst, in the number of women who are hired, in the overall proportion and representation of women at every level in the company, including the board, the leadership team, and every other level and function. We also have studied the engagement and satisfaction and turnover rates of women at Health Catalyst as compared to men and to our overall averages here, and currently observe that the female team member engagement and satisfaction scores are slightly above the overall Health Catalyst scores, currently in the 99th percentile in Gallup's database. We are applying the same long-term focus and consistency now to the experience of team members of color. This has been a focus now for the past two years, and we anticipate needing to continue this focus for many years to come in order to see meaningful progress in this area as well. I agree with your sentiment that in order for real progress to be achieved, there must be a much deeper commitment than a marketing or PR campaign, and I certainly feel a deeper commitment to this important area. I also acknowledge that progress here comes slowly, and that we are not perfect at Health Catalyst, and have much work to still do here. I also acknowledge that there is always room for improvement as it relates to our technology and as it relates to the team member experience. We are consistently working to improve and strengthen our technology capabilities, and this was a major focus of our 2021 planning process. We are in a competitive, dynamic space, to be sure, and our 2021 planning review certainly uncovered areas of needed investment and strengthening of our data platform technology capabilities, as well as our apps-layer and data-layer capabilities. We have prioritized these areas in our investment decisions for 2021. And as it relates to team member engagement in the context of being a public company, with signfiicant expectations that come with being a public company, I do acknowledge that we do have high expectations from our investors -- and that this has been the case for the past decade, whether private or public. Ever since we accepted VC investment, with that investment we also accepted high performance expectations. Finding ways to deliver on those expectations while also remaining centrally focused on team member engagement is very challenging, to be sure. It requires a daily focus, at every level, including at the CEO level, to constantly work towards meeting and exceeding these financial expectations, while consistently advocating for our team members who are producing this strong performance. We do face constraints each year that we must operate within, and we are required each year to "earn the right" to be an independent company. But we also must keep working on and advocating for team members, and I still feel that my head should never hit my pillow in any given day without me having worked to improve the team member experience at Health Catalyst. Here again, there is no doubt that we have room for improvement, and I'm striving to learn and understand which areas need the most focus, by receiving unfiltered feedback and being open to that feedback. To that end, I appreciate you sharing your feedback in a transparent and unfiltered way here on Glassdoor. I hope that as you continue forward at Health Catalyst, you will observe improvement, over time, in these areas you've highlighted. We'll keep working to improve in the days, weeks, months and years ahead. Best, Dan
3.0
Feb 23, 2021

Too Good to be True

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

I really believe in the product that Health Catalyst has to offer. We normalize data from different sources quickly and effectively to create dashboards for consumption. The applications created are optimized for succinct operation. We have a large toolbelt of applications to show outcomes improving and cost savings. You can meet amazingly talented individuals from across the globe. I have met some lifelong connections through Health Catalyst.

Cons

When something seems “too good to be true” it probably is. I started working for Health Catalyst and remember thinking it was too good to be true. I said, “Wow! What an incredible healthcare organization – unlimited PTO, amazing healthcare benefits, 12 weeks paid paternity leave, great education budget, employees get to take one business trip a year with their spouse at the business’ expense.” Everyone you talked to “loved” working for Health Catalyst. After a rough 2020, I have come to the realization that it is too good to be true. In the most recent ASO team meeting, we were informed that we should be working 40- to 50-hour work weeks. This has “always” been the expectation (I have never heard this before). There is no PTO bank for sick days, vacation, bereavement, or jury duty. If you must take days off for these events, you are expected to put in more hours to make up for the time off. Essentially, the message was, “If you can’t maintain this level of work effort, feel free to go elsewhere.” I have a problem with this communication because of other conflicting messages we have received. Dan Burton, CEO, has said, “Any team member needing to take some time for their own wellness is encouraged to take the time needed” and “We would also emphasize our strong support of team members who have increased family responsibilities as more schools choose to close for some period of time. We are strongly supportive of lots of flexibility and understanding in this regard.” Yet, we need to break ourselves the next day to make up for the much-needed time off. We are constantly receiving conflicting information about work expectations. One minute, we need to work on the plane while we are traveling and the next minute we cannot work on a plane because of HIPAA concerns. In one time-tracking application, it is indicated that we need to have 30 client billable hours a week, but in another presentation its minimum 35 client billable hours per week. In reality, there were multiple weeks in a row where I remember working 50 client billable hours (yet I was told that was abnormal). Now, it seems that it is the expectation for the entire department. During the COVID pandemic, many companies needed to shift their expectations for employees. More sick time. More family responsibilities. At the same time, we had an incredible Black Lives Matter movement. Racism is real. We need to make conscious efforts to create a more just world. On top of that, a huge political division. All these events reminded us that representation matters. Diversity is important. Mental health is important. There are so many perspectives worth listening to. When you have too many like-minded people in leadership, bad things can transpire. The ASO director made a mistake when he invited team members leave if they could not meet hourly expectations. There are so many reasons why someone cannot put in overtime every single week — they have children, loved ones are sick, their mental or physical health is suffering (see events that cause this above). If you are relatively unaffected by the events above, then sure, maybe 50-hour work weeks are sustainable. For a company whose work revolves around results with improvement, it is counterintuitive to consistently ask its employees to work overtime nearly every week of the year. There are studies that show working long hours does not improve productivity. Instead, working long hours increases absenteeism, attrition, and health insurance costs. Some companies are shortening their workweek to 32 hours. Those results show employees are more productive, they feel healthier, and take fewer days off. It is quite oxymoronic that a company that focuses on data, improvement, and healthcare advocates for 50-hour work weeks. I have heard stories of several employees having some sort of a mental breakdown because of the high productivity expectations. They end up suddenly leaving the company because they needed to spend time focusing on their mental health and spending time with their family. It is very much a cultural expectation to put in long hours. If you are not stressed or tired, you are not working enough to meet Health Catalyst standards. Then sprinkled in an email is “See the Positives” and “Find Peace, Even in the Storm” or a chat message “at least you have a job” and “look on the bright side.” Those examples of toxic positivity also cause a myriad of effects. Health Catalyst does have many benefits offered. They recently added a mental health benefit through an online therapy company. Problem is – I have no idea when I can actually take the time off to attend a session. I suppose it is more economical for Health Catalyst to offer benefits than it is to hire more employees to ensure a work-life-balance. In fact, the ASO director guilted us by saying if you cannot meet these hour expectations, then your teammates must make up for your deficit or we may have to hire someone else. Consistently expecting your employees to put in overtime is not sustainable. In fact, it is precisely the conundrum. We are ensuring our own job security by working long hours. We are working so much that we are not taking care of ourselves and our families. This causes a waterfall of health issues and we become a data point in the visualizations we have created for improving outcomes. Many of these issues are not unique to this company. It is a systemic problem in US healthcare and corporate work culture. This façade that “Health Catalyst is better than the other guys” is what is unique. I do not know how they have managed to keep everyone drinking the Health Catalyst Kool-Aid for so long.

avatar
Health Catalyst Response
5y
Thank you for sharing this feedback about your experience since joining Health Catalyst less than a year ago. And what a challenging year this past year has been, at so many levels! I also want to share that I agree with the concept that if something seems too good to be true, it is most often actually too good to be true. I feel regret that your actual experience relative to your expectation has been negative, and feel there are some important learnings for me and for other leaders to internalize and then work to change, in order to become better. I have asked a number of other leaders, particularly in the professional services organization, to read your review and consider what learnings we might take from your experience, and others' similar experiences. One critical learning, which I'll mention to all team members later today in our all-team-member meeting, is this concept that Health Catalyst isn't too good to be true, and we all need to understand this. I always want us to strive to be the best we possibly can be, but this will also always be within very real constraints tied to financial expectations and sustainability. This is a key learning that I'm taking from your feedback, that we need to be respectfully transparent in communicating with team members what to expect at Health Catalyst, from before a team member joins, through their tenure at the company. And this includes, very importantly, clearly communicating what is expected and required within each organization, including within the professional services organization. For example, in the professional services organization, we have studied and benchmarked many other professional services organizations, and our goal has been to make the team member experience as positive and sustainable as possible within the context of running a financially-sustainable professional services business. And, as an example, we worked over an extended period of time to develop a model where a team member, on average, could work approximately 45 hours per week, take three weeks of vacation, in addition to 3 1/2 weeks of company-paid holidays, and still meet our billable hours and utilization thresholds to be financially sustainable. This 45-hour expectation is meaningfully lower than many other professional services organizations' expectations. But it is still challenging and demanding and requires significant effort and focus and time management skill to sustain. We could have and should have been respectfully transparent in sharing this expectation so that every team member understands what they are signing up for when they join our professional services organization. We can also offer short-term flexibility to a team member who is facing difficulty, absolutely. But longer-term, it becomes challenging to be breakeven as a business unit without those threshold levels being in place. As a result, working in professional services is likely not the best fit for everyone, and we have many other positions and other functions at Health Catalyst which might offer more schedule flexibility and less pressure. There are often other trades associated with making these changes, like for example the compensation for certain roles which are higher-pressure and require more hours are often higher-paid roles as well. But these are important tradeoffs for us to be transparent about, and to support team members in identifying the right position given their individual circumstances. I also acknowledge a number of recent situations where a teammate has decided to step back from a position due to exhaustion and/or other difficulties associated with a particular job. In the situations where I have been directly involved in helping a teammate navigate through these difficult circumstances and then make the decision to make a change, I have also internalized some important learnings from these experiences, related to a learning I shared previously. It is that we need to do a better job of describing the positives and the negatives of various roles, including promotion opportunities. Sometimes we talk about promotions only in terms of the positives -- base salary increase, more responsibility, new stretching career development experiences, more total compensation, etc. But there are also very real negatives -- often more hours, more pressure, more stress, more difficulty associated with these new responsibilities and increased scope. As such, we also will be communicating that we are supportive of team members who decide that they would like to stay in their current position long-term, and we will continue to work to pay above-market for that position, across every position, function and level at Health Catalyst. Thank you again for sharing your feedback regarding your experiences during your first year at Health Catalyst. Your feedback has prompted some insights that we'll work to incorporate, including by discussing some of these themes during today's All Team Member meeting. Best, Dan
Viewing 343 - 345 of 784 Reviews

Glassdoor has 847 Health Catalyst reviews submitted anonymously by Health Catalyst employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Health Catalyst is right for you.