Health Catalyst reviews

3.4

45% would recommend to a friend

(780 total reviews)
avatar

Ben Albert

Not enough data to show CEO approval

24% positive business outlook

Health Catalyst has an employee rating of 3.4 out of 5 stars, based on 780 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Health Catalyst employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Healthcare industry (3.4 stars).

Reviews by job title

780 reviews
2.0
Nov 8, 2018

Troubling future ahead if corrections aren't made

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The pay and benefits were good and I enjoyed working with some of the people. I enjoyed the team parties that we had every so often.

Cons

The company is too remote and I didn't feel like I was a part of a team. Many people work from home and the only interaction with the team is during a 15 min standup meeting. There's less a feeling of connectedness and collaboration with your team when all of your work is done remotely. A major part of a great workplace is being able to interact with great people. When you get stuck doing Webex/Slack meetings as the majority of your interaction, it really eats away at that "Great Workplace". While working at the company I felt there was a real lack of diversity in the way people think. It very much feels like it's a yes person culture, and if you are an outside thinker you'll experience issues here. On several occasions I brought up concerns I had with the way an implementation was going or with the performance of a product, and most concerns I felt were ignored. At Health Catalyst, I don't feel like you can bring up alternative views/designs without causing problems. The best way to describe how things are done is with the word groupthink. Instead of providing critical feedback on ideas, people tend to just build on top of ideas that haven't been thoroughly explored. If you try to provide alternative ideas during a discussion others will think you're trying to sabotage others. I've read through other reviews, and I'm glad I wasn't the only person who has experienced this. One review that I really connected with was the following: "Another contributing factor that is discussed around the watercooler is the overly submissive yes-person culture created by the over-emphasis on "humility" as a core value. Bad ideas thrive in this environment because few challenge ideas." While the company may be doing well on the analytic side I feel they are struggling on the web development side. There seems to be a real lack of knowledge in how to use the tech stack chosen which has lead some projects to becoming quite brittle and fragile. These are very young projects(under 3 years) and it left me worried with how much tech debt they had already accrued. My worry is that many of these projects will be slow to adjust to clients needs/wants because of the poor design decisions or lack thereof. I'd also noticed that many people were leaving the company around the time that I left, and that should be concerning for management. While the pay and benefits are good, they aren't enough to keep me where engineers can't feel safe to provide critical feedback and when the company has a questionable future with web apps.

avatar
Health Catalyst Response
7y
Thank you for sharing this feedback. One of the positives of responding directly to each Glassdoor review, for me as the CEO, is that it is one way to stay connected to "unfiltered" feedback, which can be very helpful. We have a few other mechanisms to try to help us receive "unfiltered" feedback, including our semi-annual Gallup surveys of every team member, and then many skip-level 1:1s and small-group discussions that I and other members of our leadership team participate in throughout each year. I try to hold approximately 100 skip-level 1:1s each year, and mostly just listen to what's going well and then proactively ask about what my colleague feels we should consider changing about any aspect of the company. There will always be opportunity for improvement. We will never be at a point as a company where there isn't a list of items we need to address in order to become better. What is critical, from my perspective, is encouraging, systematically, the unfiltered feedback to be shared, so that we can understand and then address those items that need to be addressed. This, to me, is a correct application of the attribute of humility -- most critically to be modeled by leaders who encourage feedback on what we need to improve, rather than shutting that feedback down. Related to this, I want to validate the feedback you shared about the incorrect application of the attribute of humility. I have heard this feedback from multiple sources, and it has reinforced the importance of us clarifying and reinforcing our message and training. This includes a reinforcement that humility is most important in our leaders -- particularly in their openness to new, even opposing ideas, and their encouragement of receiving feedback from their teams on areas of needed improvement. It is absolutely critical that these leaders foster, and do not discourage, openness to multiple diverse points of view, and to the concept that they can learn from each of their colleagues and teammates, which requires that they not shut down contrary ideas. It's also critical for every team member to live the operating principle of courageous transparency -- when they believe an alternate voice needs to be heard, it is crucial that they share that perspective, courageously! We will work to reinforce this, including during today's All Team Member meeting, where we'll specifically review, as a company, your feedback, and talk about it together. Next, relative to our buildout of web apps, this is a relatively new area for the company, so I agree that we need to carefully monitor our performance here. I have been pleased to see the number of installations of some of our most popular web applications, now at dozens of our existing clients. We will make utilization of these applications a major focus for 2019. Finally, regarding turnover, I also pay close attention to this metric, and we'll share the data today in our All Team Member meeting, as we always do, from our most recent board meeting two weeks ago, which includes our "people" slide, with data on our trailing-twelve-month turnover rate for everyone to see. It is a critical part of our mission to attract and then retain talented team members, and we will always have room for improvement here. The data that we'll review together today shows that the company has maintained a voluntary turnover rate between 6.7% and 8.4% during the past twelve months, with October coming in at 6.9%. This voluntary turnover rate compares quite favorably (less than half) vs. industry averages, but still highlights opportunity for us to improve. I am sorry that it didn't work out for you to stay at Health Catalyst and continue to contribute to the company's mission and success. We will work hard to address the issues of openness to different points of view, of strengthening our web apps and retaining our team members. And I wish you success in your future endeavors! Best, Dan
4.0
Dec 21, 2017
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The CEO is caring, conscientious, and humble. The senior leadership team cares about making a difference and being a best place to work (at least they talk about it *all the time*). They allow people to work from home. They have snacks. Everyone seems to care (people are kind to one another). After typing out all the cons, in the end, I suppose most every company struggles with things... the cons can be frustrating, but in the end, I think a big plus is that most everyone at HC has been super nice and supportive (even if we still don't know our responsibilities), and to me, that makes a big difference (yes, we have grumpy people too, but there aren't too many that I've found).

Cons

Poor understanding of roles/responsibilities of departments/teams, even after they did a reorg 6 months ago. The software the company produces is challenging to use (it does many neat things, but troubleshooting issues is a pain.). You can work crazy hard and regardless of how hard you work it doesn't feel like it matters for your bonus because bonuses are given out to everyone equally (bonuses are based on company goals. If the company doesn't meet its goals, you don't get a big of a bonus regardless of your contributions). It seems that there aren't seasoned people in middle management positions and/or the senior leadership doesn't get involved at lower levels of the company. It just feels like things are really hectic, there aren't clear ways of doing things (there are multiple document systems, multiple ticket tracking systems, multiple communication platforms). None of the systems really talk to each other. Senior leadership tried to introduce a new communication/documentation system awhile ago in (what seemed) like an effort to consolidate. Now we have yet another communication system. At the team/department level it feels like we are acting like a small company still and that doesn't scale well. There may be efforts to transition to acting like a larger organization, but if those efforts exist they aren't well known.

avatar
Health Catalyst Response
8y
Thanks very much for your review. I've read and reread it a couple times to try to ensure that I internalize this feedback. First, I appreciate your positive comments about the company, and I'm glad to hear that these positives have been a meaningful part of your experience. I also appreciate your acknowledgement that every company has its struggles--that has certainly been my experience working for many different organizations. Even high performing organizations have room for improvement, and that will always include us at Health Catalyst having room for improvement. I appreciate your comments about the need to improve our clarity on roles and responsibilities post-reorg. I acknowledge we have improvement opportunities, and we are still discussing and clarifying our understanding as a Leadership Team of roles and responsibilities, (including as recently as last week's LT meeting) which reinforces your point, likely at every level of the company. We'll keep working on this--I do feel like my understanding is improving, and that our leadership team's understanding is also improving, and we'll keep following up to try to ensure that this cascades throughout the organization. I also acknowledge that we're on a journey of improvement regarding our software capabilities, and I feel really positively about the progress we've made, particularly these past 2 1/2 years under Dale's leadership and the tech leadership team's stewardship. In many ways 2017 has been a historic year for the company in terms of the leaps forward in our technology capabilities. And yet, with all that progress, there is still much work to do, and there are plenty of examples where we're not quite to where we want to be, in terms of leading the industry from a technology perspective. I appreciate your ongoing contributions to strengthening our technology capabilities, and feel very good about continuing an outsized investment in R&D in 2018 (and permanently) as a proportion of our overall operating expenses, to try to enable our long-term tech leadership. But we still definitely have work to do. Thanks also for your comments about the capability set and development plans for our mid-level managers. This has been an area of attention for us as a leadership team, and I want to acknowledge that there are few shortcuts to developing great skill as a manager and as a leader. So, this is an area that will take consistent focus and effort, over sustained periods of time, to register systemic improvement. About two years ago we began a concerted effort and focus in helping new managers develop the skills, capabilities and characteristics of great leaders and managers. We started with a focus on holding regular 1:1s and in those 1:1s focusing first on listening and on asking the overarching question "how can I help you be successful" to each of their fellow team members during those 1:1s. We've added some additional trainings and more recently, we're incorporating management mentoring into our overall mentorship program. But I'm confident we can do more, here. I'll follow up with our Leadership Team on what we can do to accelerate the development of our managers. I agree with your last point that improvement in this regard is the responsibility of the leadership of the company. We take that responsibility seriously and will work to improve in this area. Finally, I want to acknowledge some of the downside of a team-based bonus approach. We all sink or swim together, which may mean that in some cases one group may have over-performed but be hampered by another group's underperformance. But this approach also has significant upside, and I'm increasingly convinced that the team-based approach, as reflected in our bonus and in many other ways, is a core element of the mission-orientation of the company and the positive culture of the company. And my hope and belief is that we gain much more than we lose, in the medium- and long-term, as teammates, in this environment. I hope that proves to be your experience over time at Health Catalyst. Thanks again for sharing these thoughtful insights--they will help us improve as a company.
3.0
Apr 25, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Flexible schedule Nice benefits Nice people

Cons

Pay is not what was promised Every year they have the potential to cut more people, are you next?? Take on more work with less staff Some teams wonder why they are not getting pushed to current or potential new customers

avatar
Health Catalyst Response
1y
Thank you for sharing your experience and for your more than five years of contributions to Health Catalyst. I truly appreciate the time, energy, and care you've put into your role. Your comments clearly show that you value your teammates, the flexibility, and the benefits we’ve worked hard to offer, and I’m very grateful to hear that. At the same time, I recognize your concerns, particularly around annual planning and staffing changes. As has been the case for several years now, our annual planning cycle can include both reductions in some areas and increased investments in others. This is a practice seen at many large, financially sustainable organizations and is not something we take lightly. We remain committed to being transparent about this, including consistently sharing the expectation that some level of position reductions may occur each year, and to providing generous severance and support when that happens. I hear your feedback on communication style and content, especially regarding our all-company meetings. While we aim to be transparent and reinforce our core messages, I acknowledge that we can always improve how we engage, listen, and show appreciation in ways that feel meaningful and sincere. In the past two years, meaningful base salary increases have been prioritized, even amid challenging conditions, and we will continue doing our best to make decisions that support our people and our long-term sustainability. Your feedback helps us reflect and grow—thank you again for sharing it and for being part of the team! -Dan Burton
Viewing 61 - 63 of 780 Reviews

Glassdoor has 843 Health Catalyst reviews submitted anonymously by Health Catalyst employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Health Catalyst is right for you.