Health Catalyst reviews

3.3

44% would recommend to a friend

(782 total reviews)
avatar

Ben Albert

28% approve of CEO

24% positive business outlook

Health Catalyst has an employee rating of 3.3 out of 5 stars, based on 782 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Health Catalyst employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Healthcare industry (3.4 stars).

Reviews by job title

782 reviews
5.0
Aug 10, 2018

Visionary Company

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

This company is positioned to do great things for the healthcare industry. The mission is real and the company leadership seems committed to fulfilling that mission. There are among the best colleagues I have ever worked with at all levels in the organization.

Cons

There are a small number of questionable senior leaders in the company that can tend to drag the culture down.

avatar
Health Catalyst Response
7y
Thanks for your thoughts and feedback, and for contributing to the mission of the company. I agree with your assessment of the quality of our colleagues at Health Catalyst -- such a fantastic combination of capability and commitment. I also appreciate your feedback regarding some situations where there may be leaders whose behaviors are not aligning with the mission and values. Our 360-degree feedback process will help every leader and manager better understand what is going well and where there are opportunities for improvement. I apologize that it's taken this long to implement this feedback, but I'm grateful we're now implementing this. And you have my personal commitment to keep investing in fundamentals. Thank you again for your review and for your contributions! Best, Dan
4.0
Nov 22, 2017

Good company

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Benefits are second to none, compensation is generous. Mission driven company and leaders at all levels of the company care about their employees. This company does good work.

Cons

-Generous PTO & holidays are diminished by unspoken/unclear expectations to work on holidays in Minneapolis office. -People don't get fired. This ends up costing a lot of resources and frustration to develop people who are lazy or not the right fit.

avatar
Health Catalyst Response
8y
I appreciate your comments and observations. And I acknowledge the challenge for the Minneapolis team members working in APR who have the difficulty of needing to try to align with both Health Catalyst and with our client's expectations--that is not always easy. I will follow up with APR leadership on the specific topic of APR expectations for holidays. I also appreciate your comment about performance management. The soft underbelly of the strategy of enabling team members to feel excited about staying at Health Catalyst for years or even decades includes the challenge of having team members or even managers that don't assume that there is also a high performance expectation which must be met. We are trying to emphasize this balanced perspective in our performance management training. This includes emphasizing that if there are performance problems that persist, those performance problems must be addressed, including in some cases the need to have a discussion about a generous severance to enable that team member to land on their feet and find another career opportunity outside of Health Catalyst. Thank you also for your observation about some of the downsides of significant transparency. This is an issue that we have discussed a number of times as a leadership team, including in our most recent weekly leadership team meeting. At a strategy level, we've opted to continue to err in favor of more transparency in continuing to share details of our financial performance and plans, but to do a better job of highlighting when we are still iterating, and also keeping our updates focused on a few salient items relevant for all team members. We are also working on sequencing so that we generally have an opportunity to communicate with leaders prior to major communications with all team members--but we have room to improve there as well. We'll keep working on it! Thanks again for taking the time to share your feedback.
5.0
Mar 22, 2017

Mission-Driven and Team-Member Focused

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Health Catalyst has a soul. The company exists to be an enabler of massive outcomes improvement in healthcare. That is a mission worth contributing to every single day. The leadership team has focused on creating a best place to work for all team members, and consistently demonstrates this commitment through their actions. Two months ago after the leadership team reviewed our semi-annual Gallup team member engagement survey results (the company uses Gallup to survey team members, and every people manager's bonus is tied to maintaining industry-leading engagement--and the company consistently scores in the 98th or 99th percentile) they highlighted a pattern of feedback from team members about the remote team member experience. So they held a small-group discussion where they invited anyone at the company who would like to attend to come and talk about what's working and not working for remote team members. Within two weeks they introduced new policies addressing and improving a few of the more significant challenges. They have followed this same process dozens of times, making many changes that improved the team member experience.

Cons

The leadership team has chosen to follow a consensus-oriented decision making approach for company-wide, strategic decisions. The upside of this approach is that the leadership team rarely makes a bad decision. But the downside is that they take longer than some management teams to come to a decision. As the company scales, I believe the decision making approach will need to evolve towards more delegated decision making and trust towards the functional leads to make the right calls. Also, a strength at Health Catalyst is that we feel like a family--team members feel that the leadership genuinely cares about them, and there is a stated policy to give team members who have had a performance problem a second chance. This produces some incredible turnaround successes and deep loyalty and commitment. It's probably one of the reasons the voluntary turnover rate is so low (3-4% per year). However, there is downside to this approach--sometimes the performance issues don't get corrected, and it takes longer to resolve these performance problems. I think the company can evolve this approach to move through the second-chance process more rapidly and then rely on offering a generous severance package when the second chance didn't work, but move more quickly.

avatar
Health Catalyst Response
9y
Thank you for your thoughtful review, and I agree with several of the common threads that exist within your post. Health Catalyst does indeed have a soul. It is the sum of our collective decisions, values, and behaviors that define our culture, and ultimately who we are. I also think that you are right about the evolutionary process that takes place within any organization. You touched on a couple specifically in your post-- consensus-oriented approach by the leadership team evolving to more distributed decision-making, requiring more trust be placed with functional leads, and evolution of our second-chance process. These, along with others, are great examples of what worked well in the past, but past success doesn't necessarily ensure the best approach for the future. I think that you will continue to see evidence of changes in several places within our organization, as we collectively work to evaluate processes against our growing and evolving organization, as we always attempt to suggest, discuss, and adopt change when necessary. Now, as we all know from our work with our own partner customers, change is hard. It takes time, and requires thought and care to ensure success. The truth is we are never done. We should always be willing to tweak and improve. Thanks again for your thoughtful comments!
Viewing 193 - 195 of 782 Reviews

Glassdoor has 845 Health Catalyst reviews submitted anonymously by Health Catalyst employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Health Catalyst is right for you.