Inter-Con Security reviews

No cons so far, all good

The move from Allied Universal to Intercon Security was fraught with disorganization, including repeated delays that prolonged uncertainty. At orientation, revealing my work location led to the sudden disclosure that the site was subcontracted to another company, not Intercon directly—this last-minute pivot caused significant concern among employees about job security, as it felt entirely unplanned and left many wondering if positions would even materialize. My brief three-month period with the subcontracted firm ended abruptly when we were dropped without notice, only to transition to Intercon—where the cycle repeated after another three months with news of yet more subcontracting. This constant flux bred instability and eroded trust. Operationally, the lack of post orders and an employee handbook meant no clear guidance on essential policies, like calling out or sick time usage, resulting in inconsistent enforcement. Performance deductions, such as losing a “star,” were applied sporadically, even with proper use of sick hours, as upper management, dispatch, and field supervisors often relied on subjective interpretations rather than standardized rules, leading to widespread confusion and perceived unfairness. Additionally, uniform provision was a major shortfall: the pants issued didn’t fit properly, requiring a return, but despite repeated requests, no replacements were provided. This forced me to purchase my own at personal expense, as the company-supplied ones were of poor quality—thin, uncomfortable material that felt prone to tearing during normal movements like bending. Such oversights not only added financial burden but also compromised daily comfort and professionalism on the job.