4.6
94% would recommend to a friend
Jack P. Gibson
92% approve of CEO
90% positive business outlook
Pros
The pay and benefits is competitive with the current job market. I met some really cool people here in other departments. I’ll take those friendships with me forever.
Cons
TOXIC - Things I experienced here: -the work of someone at the company was openly mocked and critiqued for around 20-30 minutes in my first 1:1 meeting. She would pull up -the work of this person was pulled up on a computer screen and made fun of -saying things like “look at this? Just awful. Can you believe how bad this is?” --an employee would be openly criticized in department meetings in a way that was rude and not constructive and made everyone so uncomfortable. -*constantly* being interrupted mid-sentence, it doesn't matter, talked over, etc. I knew as soon as I started work here that I had made a massive mistake. MANAGEMENT - I found my time working here to be dehumanizing. I was actually “docked” a little on my first performance review for not being open and honest with feedback. So, in the next few weeks, I provided some feedback (which was required weekly as a check-in on a software platform implemented by HR!) that I would benefit from better training and understanding that sometimes I do need more information about a project in order to do my best work. This feedback was thrown in my face in my next 1:1. This person is emotionally immature, extremely insecure, and resorts to defensive, manipulative tactics when having crucial conversations. Your boundaries will not be respected. I once voiced my concern that there seems to be very little boundaries between departments as a result of lack of established processes. I shared that, personally, lack of boundaries makes me feel unsafe. This was thrown back in my face, and circled back to the feedback I left (see above) using the HR-required feedback platform, and said “well you talk about feeling unsafe, I feel unsafe when you don’t seem to want to write things down when I’m talking. I don’t have time to repeat myself.” So, to recap, this person took the feelings I shared and used them against me as a way to minimize my experience and avoid taking responsibility for the feedback I left in the first place. I was also criticized for being “unwilling to infer.” Once, in a 1:1, I tried to suggest an excel function because the person was struggling with it and the person immediately cut me off and all but yelled “I KNOW MY EXCEL FUNCTIONS!!!” It’s 2022, and yes, we’re still doing the top-heavy, one-sided, toxic management at IRMI. WORK - Their systems are extremely antiquated. This is the ultimate reason I had to leave. I felt like I was rusting. Don’t expect to be keeping up with your professional peers in terms of MarTech usage. Systems include mail chimp and Microsoft Dynamics CRM and nothing can be done without IT’s approval. Seriously nothing, you can’t even create forms without having to ask IT to do it for you. There is no sync between marketing and sales. Also, there is a really weird obsession with the best performing conference. Every single meeting you will go over how good the conference is doing (which is no credit to marketing since its brand has been around for over 40 years) and yet leaders takes credit for every bit of its success. The lesser performing conferences are neglected, which only sets up a repeat of the pattern in coming years. There is a lot of talk of “go ahead and manifest that we’ll hit our numbers for this conference.” Like, these people don’t realize that the rest of the world is actually able to control and predict ROI. Here, though, there’s a lot of “let’s see if this works” and “yay it worked!” This place is where your career will go to die. HR - My last performance review was really good, never had any verbal reprimands or write-ups. However, There is no objective measurement of your performance - it’s all based on a subjective opinion or appraisal of you. You’ll be measured based on the “core values” if you collaborate, are results driven, pursue quality, think of the customers, are open and honest, etc. But each of these categories is ranked based on a leader's perception. When I gave my 2 week notice via email, I received no reply, just a cryptic meeting invite titled “discussion” for 9 AM Monday morning with NO description or explanation. Come Monday morning, I was already locked out of my computer and had to take the meeting on my cell phone, and got kicked off halfway through. I had no idea I would not be working my two weeks notice until that meeting, and no idea that my access to my work computer would be severed. There was no exit interview and not a single question asked about my experience at IRMI even though I did give extremely thorough feedback reflecting all of this at the 6 month mark in a survey required by HR. The key players aren’t interested in growing - make no mistake. They will do a lot of saying that they’re open to new ideas, but only if those ideas fit the current box in which they live.
Pros
Excellent pay and benefits, within a month they gave all employees a 5% base pay increase. Beautiful office and with the exception of a few people it is a friendly employee focused environment.
Cons
I was also given a writeup within the first month for being exactly 2 minutes late to our daily morning Teams meeting (A meeting of 3-4 people that literally have adjacent offices) due to me assisting an employee with his computer to resolve his TICKET. The company always talks about how important it is to cultivate a nice, fun, friendly & family like environment however my experience with both my manager and the coworker I was hired to help due to being promoted were anything BUT genuine. I told my coworker some minor things in confidence and what do you know I was approached by my manager for it. It wasnt anything bad but it just proved to me that I couldn't trust the one person I should because career advancement and kissing butt was more important for them and I am somehow supposed to be trained and be friendly with him. I then decided to test him and said small things knowing they would be passed along and sure enough they were.
Pros
IRMI values doing things right the first time- taking the time to get total cost of ownership estimates and not cutting corners. IRMI also values hiring the right people and fitting them to roles; toxic employees don't last long (if they even get past the interview). Hours are excellent- I'm salary but have averaged under 40 hours/week likely in every month for the six years I've been here at time of writing. Official hours are 7.5 hours/day, with some flexibility for picking your "shift" (ex. 7:30am-4:00pm vs 9:00am-5:30pm). As a developer I occasionally have after hour duties, I'm quite confident these never added up to outweighing the extra 30 minutes off each day. Employees can telework three days a week (assuming their job responsibilities don't require them to be in the office; most roles are flexible in this regard). I for one like this balance- I value spending time with co-workers in the breakroom both from my department and other departments. Company is small and everyone can know everyone. My previous employer (internship) was Google, and it goes without saying I talk more with IRMI's executives and directors than Google's. IRMI is a profitable and stable company. We have not had a unprofitable year since the early 2000s, if in this century at all (I've not seen the data pre great recession, but I know we were profitable even then). Not a single employee has been laid off due to lack of budget that I'm aware of, definitely not since I started in 2016. Tenure is high. People who can last a year or two tend to stick around. Several employees have been here for 30+ years, many for 10-30 years, and one for 40+ years. I don't know the exact numbers, but I wouldn't be surprised if half the company has been here 10 years. At other companies this may be a lack of innovation, but not so at IRMI. When IRMI started it was 100% print, large printers beyond my millennial imagination, and now we're nearly 100% online. Employees who've stayed with us have experienced career changes as the publishing industry has developed. Unless circumstances drastically change in my personal life or in work (which I don't anticipate), I could see myself here for decades. Without going into detail, compensation is fair. I've never asked for a raise, and the promotions I've gotten have had clear paths. Ex: decide upon goals for promotion, reach goals, receive promotion. As an individual without spouse/dependents, my health insurance is covered at 100% and IRMI contributes to my HSA. I'm 100% confident I could get more money at another company if I wanted, but I also expect such compensation package to be compensating for something: inferior (or downright toxic) work culture, stress, hours, politics, legacy systems, etc. Companies which only invest in salaries aren't going to have the same quality of work culture IRMI has. IRMI may not pay me as much as I could earn, and some of that is because IRMI puts that money toward making the company sane in many other ways. I have no interest in job hunting for raises; with all the pros I have listed here I'd be stupid to throw them away for a larger number in my bank account. Vacation day rollover is large- it doesn't "roll over" at the end of the year, dropping any hours you've accrued over 2 weeks or something. Rollover is calculated per paycheck, and you stop accruing if you've hit the limit (which is high, I don't remember the specifics since it changes some with tenure). I've never had issues scheduling PTO for a vacation or other needs. You're encouraged to stay home if you're sick / unable to give 100% (ex. exhausted, unable to focus). Longer vacations are easy to schedule, you just need to give adequate notice. In 2019 I was out of the country for 3 weeks (and ended up sick for a further week) and it was not an issue at all. Information silos are discouraged. We want the team to be cross-trained and processes to be documented. This works to everyone's benefit- if you want to leave the country for a few weeks, the team can function without bothering you. When I was out of the country my work account was completely disabled, since the only "people" who'd try to access my account would be hackers/other malicious actors. Pretty nice way to disconnect- couldn't have worked if I wanted to. Early in my career at IRMI I had a rough spot with my work, including (but not limited to) poor work performance. The company worked with me to get things back on track when they had good reasons to cut me loose if they wanted. This greatly increased my respect for the company and the people involved. IRMI prefers to promote known and trusted employees over hiring unknowns, so one doesn't have much competition with prospective employees when there are job openings. Several employees have changed departments, effectively changing their individual careers. I have many co-workers I'd call my friend, it's not just a bunch of random people doing their minimum (or even maximum, as regards workaholics) for a paycheck. This is quite long, but really it's short. There's many more pros I could share. IRMI is a company I would have all my friends work for if we only had enough openings. I've never wanted to work anywhere else, even when things have been rough and I've never envied another friend's job opportunities.
Cons
Every workplace has its downsides, and IRMI is not without its problems. There's no shortage of work to be done (job security). There is certainly office politics here and there (but as far as office politics go, I think we have it great). As a developer, the fact our department is not directly correlated to revenue is a blessing and a curse. It's a blessing because we don't have unnegotiable deadlines which if missed damage the company's reputation/revenue. It's a curse because it's difficult to demonstrate additional hires (to help with workload) would actually be a positive ROI for the company. That said, it's not like I'm doing overtime to stay above water (see pros section). Expanding on the above, career progression opportunities are certainly different than those at Google and other big tech companies. It's not to say quality work isn't well compensated: if you can deliver X value for the company, you can expect to be fairly compensated for X. It's just that the best of developers could provide value worth Y millions of dollars for Google (and be compensated accordingly), but there simply aren't developer problems at IRMI which if solved would net the company millions. Personally I'm completely fine with this; I love what I do and am not chasing the most money I can get. Vacation day accrual could be better, but that's more of an America problem than an IRMI problem. It's better than the American average, though not as competitive as some tech firms. If I were to advocate for change, I'd lean towards voting in statewide/nationwide changes over pressuring the company to put itself in a disadvantage compared to competitors which may not be so generous. Not really a con, but the only thing within IRMI's control I can foresee spoiling my opinions on the company is a change in management for the worse. I think this unlikely because it's no accident we have the management I appreciate today: if the owner wanted to squeeze as much money out of the company as possible, he'd have done so. I don't think that's going to change any time soon, and as current management retires and things change, I expect the values will remain the same.
Check out your Company Bowl for anonymous work chats.