Lab49 Sr. Software Engineer reviews

2.8

15% would recommend to a friend

(15 total reviews)
avatar

Roman Trachtenberg

34% approve of CEO

1% positive business outlook

Sr. Software Engineer employees have rated Lab49 with 2.8 out of 5 stars, based on 15 company reviews on Glassdoor. This indicates that most Sr. Software Engineer professionals have an average working experience there. Lab49 is rated 25% below average by Sr. Software Engineer professionals compared to other employers within the Management & Consulting industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

15 reviews
4.0
Feb 25, 2015
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

As a current employee, I'm pretty tired of the bashing when it's generally unwarranted. Every company has issues, and in the end it's what you make of it and how vocal you are that makes your experience positive or negative. I've worked full-time and as a salaried consultant. Having seen the inner-workings of companies that paid me, or I consulted for, I can say that Lab is top-tier in most every aspect. The pay is competitive to the street, and the health benefits are fantastic for a small company. Your mobile is partly subsidized, and they will expense some training courses and conferences (if you present at the conference, or at Lab with an update of what you've learned). You're working on a different project 2-3 times a year, so there's always a change of pace / outlook, and a constant exposure to new technologies / frameworks. You're working with smart and dedicated people, who want to work with smart and dedicated people, who also want to improve their craft and share with their coworkers. If you're not a full-stack developer, you'll find opportunities to become so, either directly on a project, or on collaborations with your coworkers. If you enjoy technology, you'll find a wealth of knowledge and experience to help you. This place is not to be confused with Facebook or Google, but I've known people who've quit those companies out of frustration, too.

Cons

Some benefits could improve. The business model has changed in recent years, and there have been growing pains. This isn't to say that management hasn't been working to improve the process, they have, and they've solicited comments and thoughts from people on the projects, those on the ground that can provide the best insight.

5.0
Feb 22, 2015
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

If you want to be a great engineer: you'll get encouragement, support and recognition. How many employers can you say that of? If you want to work on X, management will sincerely try to get you the chance to work on X. Which for a consulting company is not easy. You get to introduce new technologies/stacks to clients, and that's exciting. Projects for clients are Lab managed - no T&M work. Smart, effective, interesting people make a culture that's somewhere between a startup and a consulting co, a good balance.

Cons

The project model is evolving, and the methodology can be onerous as the kinks are worked out. That said, being on Lab managed projects is a whole lot better that being a resource on a client-managed project. New technologies are risky, and Lab eats that risk, which can be stressful.

1.0
Sep 14, 2014

Avoid

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Made some great friends her Smart people

Cons

Management are morons Burn out good people

Viewing 13 - 15 of 15 Reviews

Glassdoor has 210 Lab49 reviews submitted anonymously by Lab49 employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Lab49 is right for you.