employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Lawrence Berkeley Lab

Is this your company?

Lawrence Berkeley Lab reviews

4.2

83% would recommend to a friend

(1,075 total reviews)

Michael Witherell

86% approve of CEO

76% positive business outlook

Lawrence Berkeley Lab has an employee rating of 4.2 out of 5 stars, based on 1,075 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have an excellent working experience there. The Lawrence Berkeley Lab employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Management & Consulting industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

1K reviews
2.0
Sep 16, 2014
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

I like the location and views from LBL. I also appreciate how they promote alternative transportation and have a general altruistic mission. There are many academic seminars and forward thinking research projects happening on campus, both at LBL and UC Berkeley.

Cons

Working at LBL is what I think it might be like to work at a nonprofit: high pressure, low pay, underappreciated. At first I was ok with it, because I thought the goal was admirable and worthwhile. However, over time I realize that there is a hierarchy here. Too many project managers, not enough engineers on a project. EETD does not value engineers. The department treats engineers like technicians, and only values program managers.

3.0
Jun 7, 2014

Depends on Department

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Prestige, location, salary, benefits, on-site services, health services on-sight, compensation package outside of salary, colleagues (peers)

Cons

Institutionalized, middle management corruption, bureaucracy, few lateral opportunities, too many meetings, salary review process

3.0
Jun 20, 2013
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

-Work-life balance is excellent. -Nice number of holidays and vacation time -Lots of interesting and important research comes out of LBNL -Decent job security as long as you are not a total slacker

Cons

This place is run by scientists with little to no background experience in running or managing a business. This could be good or bad depending on what you do. If you are doing research, that's probably a plus for you. But as a Business/Finance professional that means there are not many opportunities to grow here. Functions in the Office of the CFO are treated by lab management as administrative annoyances - hindrances to research - rather than functions that can add value to the organization. The lab produces science, not profits, so the relative importance of Finance is diminished. To make things more difficult, because the lab is government funded, there are layers of red-tape and paperwork required of the CFO staff that makes what should be simple tasks unnecessary complicated. Researchers here don't understand these burdens and therefore just assume the CFO staff is incompetent - which is not the case. This leads to mistrust and mutual frustration. In short, if you are in a Business/Finance/Operations type function, and are looking to build a career, this is probably not the place for you. Stick to the corporate world. If you are in a later stage of your career and looking to coast into retirement, this place is probably a pretty good option.

Viewing 28 - 30 of 1,075 Reviews

Glassdoor has 1,336 Lawrence Berkeley Lab reviews submitted anonymously by Lawrence Berkeley Lab employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Lawrence Berkeley Lab is right for you.