Mars & Co reviews

4.0

91% would recommend to a friend

(100 total reviews)

Daniele Lienhart and Mike Turner

85% approve of CEO

67% positive business outlook

Mars & Co has an employee rating of 4.0 out of 5 stars, based on 100 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Mars & Co employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Management & Consulting industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

100 reviews
2.0
Jun 8, 2014
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

• Get to work with some of the largest companies in the world. Most clients are #1, 2, or 3 in their industry • Opportunities for international travel exist if you want them • Staffing on travel projects can be minimized if you want it to be, though you take a hit in promotion potential • Moderately smart consultants at entry levels (Associate, Senior Associate, and Consultant), though as was mentioned in another review, there are a lot of ‘second bests,’ especially in terms of communication skills • Advancement can come quickly, though often it is a result of a person working very long hours for weeks/months to right a sinking ship • It may sound sarcastic, but the bad management and communication skills that run rampant in the company actually provide a great opportunity to learn how to be a good manager by observing what not to do • Good pay relative to non-consulting jobs (though below industry average within consulting)

Cons

• Poor management with complete lack of transparency. Basic things like relevant available data, cadence of meetings, and project deliverables may never be communicated and may be surprisingly hard to get out of your manager. Larger projects commonly see duplication of effort and people working for hours/days on obsolete modules, particularly with our soft drink client • High volatility in hours compared to industry average. This stems from poor top-down communication, leading to a ‘hurry up and wait’ mentality that often ends with a mad rush before a meeting that could have been avoided through defined expectations and a project roadmap • Complete lack of training: building a valuable skill set is a combination of getting lucky in whom you’re staffed with, recognizing your weak areas, and a lot of google searches. Some people never build competency in Excel, data analysis, presentation flow, etc., and you’ll be forced to pick up the slack if you’re staffed alongside them • Office location is inconvenient: either commute 1.5 hours every day and live in NYC or commute 20 minutes and live in Stamford, CT • A decent chunk of the organization is analytically-competent but socially challenged individuals, leading to dysfunctional teams and poor communication across managerial relationships • Management attitude: from day one you’re made to understand that you are basically a disposable cog. Especially at the AC and SAC levels, your intellectual contributions are generally not welcome. As one VP put it, you’re there to be an ‘excel jockey.’ This attitude starves off any investment in the success of the project and any feeling of commitment to the firm • No one seems happy. Out of ~40 people that I interacted with only 2 did not either say or demonstrate their unhappiness at Mars.

1.0
Jan 15, 2015
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- smart coworkers. but the good ones leave within a year or so of joining that is pretty much it

Cons

- little opportunity for career growth - painful hours with little visibility / control over work/life balance (managers might call you at midnight to do work, and be angry if you do not respond) - unmotivated, negative attitude among consultants - poor project management - little/no culture - lack of solid HR / recruiting teams - bad location (unless you enjoy living in Connecticut)

1.0
Jan 2, 2021
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- International Exposure (and travel opportunities) - Capable and smart people at AC/SAC levels (although high turnover) - Competitive Salary

Cons

First, let me start by stating that any claim-like statements made in this review are my honest personal opinions, though all statements are derived from truthful personal experiences. Below is a collection of observations I wish had been made known to me before starting at Mars, so I hope they will be useful to the Glassdoor community. - Extreme lack of diversity and representation in every way, with no apparent effort to remedy this. All senior leadership in CT office are white men; only 15% of consultants are female, a fact that persists to this very day. By the time I left the firm, there were 0 (zero) consultants from underrepresented backgrounds and could count on 1 hand the number of non-white consultants. - The above lends itself to a problematic corporate culture despite claims that it is supposedly “meritocratic”. Favoritism from upper management and unchecked subconscious biases dictated promotions. - Abusive management. One manager got away with giving negative reviews for an associate on purely soft skills such as “attitude” and not seeming “professional” enough with weak substantiation, even when that manager himself made sexist remarks, threw unconstructive and verbally abusive temper tantrums (which probably would have constituted a workplace violation at any other legitimate firm), and generally behaved like an overgrown man-child on the job. When asked to provide constructive, actionable feedback instead to justify his negative review, the manager refused and simply said his review was based on an “overall impression”. This occurred in the presence of "HR" (In quotes because Mars does not have a dedicated HR team, which is another huge problem I’ll get into), who not only did not open a case or require that the manager clarify or make specific actionable claims, but even later gaslighted the associate to try to convince them that the manager’s review was fair and unbiased, despite the associate’s deep concerns about clear indicators suggesting otherwise. - Enabling the above, no system of accountability to ensure a positive workplace environment. No training around expectations of behavior, how to report violations of bullying/abuse – if there were even formalized rules/expectations to begin with, they were not effectively communicated. No peer or upward feedback; no dedicated HR team. This means that upper management promotes middle management and middle management promotes associates. Then, if a manager is abusive, they can expect to get away with it so long as upper management is satisfied with their work since associates do not have an HR team to go to with their concerns, just the multi-functional office management team, whose interests appear to be more about self-preservation and keeping upper management happy and are thus disincentivized from actually disciplining errant managers. - Very limited training at all levels. As addressed above, promotions are solely based on perception from above. Nice slides does not a good manager make, but that’s how it works here; upon promotion, newly minted managers are not trained on any leadership / management skills whatsoever. At the associate level too, new hires are expected to hit the ground running – which wouldn’t be so bad if it weren’t compounded with managers who frankly do not care about their associates. Associates need to be proactive about their own learning and development at Mars; the hard part is knowing what one doesn’t know, and thus what questions to ask. - Project work is consistent. But, unexciting. Many of the clients Mars has today are Fortune 100 companies with long-standing relationships, but that means certain projects are more on the routine and menial side and more to do with maintaining market share / refreshing operations rather than anything truly groundbreaking. Mars knows this is their sweet spot, and that these legacy clients are their ‘cash cows’; upper management appears complacent to collect their dues from these guys and to leave the real innovators at the forefront of their industries to seek the counsel of other consulting firms. Lean companies can be nimble, cutting-edge, and creative. Unfortunately, they can also be lean the same way your neighborhood pizza parlor is lean – like a family-run business that grasps tightly to what they already know and has little interest in learning new skills, attracting new clientele, or growing into different frontiers. Mars is very much the latter. If you’re a talented, self-respecting college senior with any other job offers on the table, in consulting or even within industry – my honest advice would be to take one of those offers and not look back. Contribute your talents to an organization that appreciates them and is invested in you and your growth.

Viewing 4 - 6 of 100 Reviews

Glassdoor has 119 Mars & Co reviews submitted anonymously by Mars & Co employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Mars & Co is right for you.