MassMutual reviews

3.5

54% would recommend to a friend

(2,382 total reviews)
avatar

Roger W. Crandall

71% approve of CEO

53% positive business outlook

MassMutual has an employee rating of 3.5 out of 5 stars, based on 2,382 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The MassMutual employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Insurance industry (3.6 stars).

Reviews by job title

2K reviews
1.0
Jun 18, 2019

Interesting perks, but toxic environment

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- Great subject matter to learn about - Casual dress - Bagel Fridays - Friendly team - Opportunity to go to conferences - Located next to a dog park, and public park - Helicopter rides between some of the offices

Cons

- Constant verbal lashings from design leadership in the office, at your desk in front of everyone, or during meetings. - Poor communication from design leadership. You could ask a simple question like, “Is it X, or is it Y?”, and rather than specifying X or Y, their answer would be, “Yes.” - Unclear expectations. Arbitrary deadlines appear out of nowhere in the past. - Hostile and toxic environment. Leadership reprimands designers for asking simple questions related to projects. - Dishonest at times. Design leadership frequently will say, “Feel free to reach out if you need anything.” But when do you reach out for help, it gets recorded as an issue, or an excuse to say why this employee is not performing well. - Unhelpful weekly 1:1’s. Hardly any guidance for setting a clear path to achieve goals for the project. Instead, they use this as an opportunity to release their anger, or criticize your work, regardless if you completed all the tasks they asked you complete. No such thing as constructive criticism. It’s just criticism. - Poor judgement on how to provide guidance. Rather than seeing each designer with unique set of skills, they imply that they think everyone has the same background, and therefore should behave exactly the same as each other. - Antiquated and inaccurate tracking systems. An excel spreadsheet is used to keep track of everyone’s work, and everyone’s time estimates can be completely off. The only thing leadership cares about is that all numbers add up to 20 points per sprint, regardless of what type and size of task you receive. Leadership also becomes irritated if tickets are carried over from a previous sprint. - Design leadership considered putting negative reviews on designers who don’t work on enough tickets per sprint, or if a ticket has carried over from a previous sprint - regardless of size or difficulty of ticket. With tickets being dependent on POs writing them, the designer will get reprimanded for something they cannot control. - Poor time management. Everyone’s schedule seems to be covered in meetings throughout the day, every day, yet expected to deliver hands-on work with aggressive deadlines. Design leadership berates you for trying to skip 1 standup meeting out of the entire month, for political purposes, despite you bringing up concerns about not having enough heads down time for work, multiple times. There is no such thing as a no-meeting day, as proposed by leadership. - Micro-managing. They will specifically require designers to include design leadership in every meeting, no matter how small the meeting is. - Design reviews are 1 hour long, 3 times a week. Feedback is mostly visual design-focused, even if the project is UX. If not visual design, it’s usually criticism about the project itself, not your work. - Poor planning. Leadership has asked employees to drop everything and fly to a satellite office at last minute. Since this was so poorly planned, all hotels would be booked out, and you would be forced to fly in/out the same day in order to avoid exorbitant lodging prices. - Design leadership has no overall vision, strategy, or ability to inspire the team. - You are your own Travel Agent, Admin, and HR.

1.0
May 2, 2019
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Excellent colleagues who are willing to collaborate to get the job done

Cons

Executive leadership shuts down constructive feedback if it does not align with their pre-conceived notions. They talk about data but only look for data that confirms what they want to see. When they do see problems, all of which are fixable, but are too focused on holding on to their position and hoping that one of their peers gets blamed for any mistakes before they do. They frequently put blame on each others' teams.

3.0
Mar 5, 2016

Director

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Flexible work arrangements and good overall benefits. Great co-workers. Wide range of career opportunities.

Cons

Senior management preaches about advantages of being a Mutual company and being able to take a long term perspective and not chasing quarterly returns. Long term is apparently one year of reduced earnings and then it's time to eliminate people regardless of performance, responsibilities, tenure, or contributions to expense efficiencies.

Viewing 16 - 18 of 2,382 Reviews

Glassdoor has 2,828 MassMutual reviews submitted anonymously by MassMutual employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if MassMutual is right for you.