Network Rail reviews

3.8

73% would recommend to a friend

(2,598 total reviews)

Jeremy Westlake

74% approve of CEO

53% positive business outlook

Network Rail has an employee rating of 3.8 out of 5 stars, based on 2,598 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Network Rail employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Construction, Repair & Maintenance Services industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

3K reviews
1.0
Jul 16, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

There honestly weren't that many. Subsidised travel and decent pension. An inpenetrable management clique - looking after each other and at the same time stabbing each other in the back.

Cons

Organisation is run by people who all look the same. Diversity is a tick box exercise. The typical employee is male, who left school with a fascination with trains and stayed long enough to be promoted, not by talent, but merely length of service. Many stories of bullying culture.

1.0
May 1, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

A handful of experienced individuals are genuinely knowledgeable and dedicated. Some interesting international project exposure for those fortunate enough to be given access. Flexible work arrangements depending on the project and manager.

Cons

Important Context — Not Network Rail: Network Rail Consulting (NRC) is a separate legal entity from Network Rail. While it was originally established with the help of Network Rail loans and financial support, it operates as an independent consultancy. Despite the shared branding, there is minimal day-to-day collaboration, and most Network Rail employees will never see any real opportunity to work with NRC, let alone gain international experience through it. This confusion benefits NRC in marketing but does not reflect operational reality. Misleading Promise of Opportunity for Network Rail Staff: Although NRC is often presented as a route for Network Rail employees to gain international or commercial consulting experience, this is largely theoretical. In practice, the opportunities are rare, poorly advertised, and tightly controlled by a small group. The vast majority of NRC roles go to external hires or members of a long-standing internal clique. Toxic Culture of Favouritism: Advancement and decision-making are dominated by a tight circle of 'favourites' who are protected regardless of performance. Staff outside this group are regularly overlooked for development and promotion, regardless of their capability or contribution. This has led to the loss of strong talent and created an atmosphere of disengagement and distrust. Lack of Succession Planning or Investment in Talent: With no clear development paths, training, or mentorship, the organisation is ageing and unprepared for the future. The small group of senior staff driving the business forward are nearing retirement, and no effort has been made to develop or bring through new UK-based talent to replace them. Strategic and Financial Missteps: The same internal dysfunction has already had external consequences. NRC was removed from a major, high-profile project that it had financially banked on — a direct result of its internal culture and poor leadership. The fallout has affected morale, stability, and the business’s credibility in the market. No Long-Term Vision: Decisions are made in reaction to short-term pressures rather than as part of any coherent strategy. Financial targets, resourcing, and project planning all feel improvised. When mistakes are made, they are quietly brushed aside rather than used as learning opportunities. Branding vs. Reality: While NRC markets itself as a global consultancy built on the strength of UK rail expertise, it is actively choosing not to invest in that expertise. The UK talent base that gives the company its credibility is being neglected, underdeveloped, and, in many cases, made redundant. High Turnover, Unclear Roles, Poor Recruitment: Recruitment is often driven by internal relationships rather than business need. New staff frequently find themselves in poorly defined roles, with little support, unclear expectations, and limited ability to influence outcomes. This has led to high turnover and organisational instability. Opaque and Ineffective Leadership: Senior leaders remain inaccessible and unaccountable. Major decisions, including redundancies, project losses, and restructures, are made behind closed doors and communicated poorly, if at all. There is no clear leadership vision, and morale has suffered significantly as a result.

1.0
Apr 28, 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Cheaper travel only that's it

Cons

Like most companies they come up with idiotic ideas that cost a fortune and don't work. They lie and make things difficult when I am sure things could be so simple. It's a bully culture even though they try to mask this by acting diverse. The contracts are unfair and if you have issues management stick together to try manage people out. let's put it this way you will never win a grievance no matter how right you are!! Higher management are corrupt and they don't tell the truth. Managers have multiple grievances raised against them yet they still seem to be able to continue with their corruption within the business dispite multiple complaints against them.

Viewing 55 - 57 of 2,598 Reviews

Glassdoor has 2,877 Network Rail reviews submitted anonymously by Network Rail employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Network Rail is right for you.