employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Pacific Retirement Services

Engaged Employer

Pacific Retirement Services reviews

3.1

44% would recommend to a friend

(90 total reviews)
avatar

Sloan Bentley

Not enough data to show CEO approval

35% positive business outlook

Pacific Retirement Services has an employee rating of 3.1 out of 5 stars, based on 90 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Pacific Retirement Services employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Healthcare industry (3.4 stars).

Reviews by job title

90 reviews
4.0
Dec 12, 2020
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Mirabella communities cater to wealthy seniors and the buildings reflect this fact. They are beautiful and clean throughout, making it a very pleasant environment to work in. No bad smells (mentioned b/c this is an unfortunate issue in some places), very nice views, spacious, good looking interior design. Quite a contrast to all the other SNFs I have seen. This was also a benefit to the patients which was gratifying to be able to provide. The overall atmosphere (for patients and staff) was very cheerful and tranquil. An excellent environment to heal or, sometimes, move on. In general, everyone was kind and approachable. Coworkers were professional and friendly. I fail to recall ever being in an uncomfortable conversation where there was gossip or negativity. That is very important in healthcare. I really think bad attitudes, toxic interactions, conflict, etc. can make or break a work experience and Mirabella staff were always at the top of their game working to maintain a pleasant professional environment. Management was helpful, professional, and highly competent. All of the nurse managers were extremely invested in the patients and ensuring positive care/health outcomes. The seniors living independently were always very courteous and generous with the healthcare staff. They contribute to some of the benefits through donations and make a point to acknowledge and thank HC staff regularly. The administration does this as well. Admin works hard to create a culture of unity with all staff in the building by offering free/discounted/very low-cost meals, setting up large spreads of free food in the breakroom, playing games w/prizes, hosting parties, and more. Above-average benefits. Most managers/admin were hired from within which encouraged professional growth.

Cons

As all nursing facilities operate, the starting pay was well below what nurses (and CNAs) deserve. This may have changed in recent years. There were decent pay increases for healthcare staff throughout the years and some were satisfied with their pay. It took some time to earn a wage comparable to starting wages in other facilities though (hospitals or large clinics). No sign-on bonus. Many other large SNFs and LTCs with a lower starting wage often provide these. Not here. High turn-over too. Though I would guess that this is the case in many SNF/LTCs because it is usually used as a leg up into a hospital system with better pay. The nurse: patient set-up was unlike what I've seen in other SNFs. Instead of one nurse taking on all the meds and treatments for a portion of the patients, there was a medication nurse and a treatment nurse. This spread the workload out with more patients for each to provide care for which, in my opinion, led to an excessive amount of area to cover and an overall unnecessary amount of additional work for both nurses/medication aids. Staff often accommodates petty demands which are unrelated to care plans and/or create disruptions to workflow. Some patients have treated licensed/certified HC professionals like "the help" while they attempt to do their jobs well. Management would benefit from teaching staff how to set appropriate boundaries. They also need to let them know that they support them. Outdated, buggy, and/or non-user-friendly charting system. Caught a snag with glitches in the system on the regular. Frustrating and contributed significantly to inefficient workflows. While improvements were made, the facility would have been much better off with higher quality computers and software. Very challenging to communicate effectively with coworkers. The building was so well built that noise doesn't travel when doors are shut and it was often a struggle to relay a message or request assistance.

5.0
Oct 4, 2020

Great company to work for

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great Benefits and good company culture

Cons

The pay was less than average

1.0
Sep 11, 2020
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

There are a lot of really great employees.

Cons

Recently a fire devastated the community of where PRS headquarters is (Southern Oregon), causing 600+ homes to be lost including the homes of 18 employees. 3 days after the tragedy management informed all employees they would need to take vacation time, then sick time, and then leave with out pay depending on their leave balances for the time they took evacuate their homes and deal with losing their homes. By doing this PRS upper management is showing how little disregard they have for their employees and all that they care about is their bottom line. From everything I heard all other businesses in the area are not requiring employees to use vacation time for this tragedy. Do better PRS.

Viewing 25 - 27 of 90 Reviews

Glassdoor has 92 Pacific Retirement Services reviews submitted anonymously by Pacific Retirement Services employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Pacific Retirement Services is right for you.