Procter & Gamble reviews

4.1

81% would recommend to a friend

(14,345 total reviews)
avatar

Jon R. Moeller

83% approve of CEO

65% positive business outlook

Procter & Gamble has an employee rating of 4.1 out of 5 stars, based on 14,345 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have an excellent working experience there. The Procter & Gamble employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Manufacturing industry (3.5 stars).

Reviews by job title

14K reviews
3.0
Jun 9, 2012
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

They do pay well for an hourly technician. The medical has gotten a bit worse since I've been here but is still better than a lot of what is available today. The profit sharing is nice, if less than what the people who started prior to 2005 receive.

Cons

A couple things here. First off and most importantly, the rotating shifts are horrible. There is no reason for them. Other than to keep employees from more easily advancing their education or seeking other employment opportunities. They justify it as having interaction with management. If that is important make managers rotate as well. They are not nearly as important to the day to day running of a manufacturing facility than the technicians are. As a matter of fact, there are probably at least 50% too many managers at this site. This leads to an even larger bureaucracy that makes the unneeded layers of said managers constantly trying to justify their jobs. We all realize we are just tools for managers to get their next promotion. Also, they try to sound incredibly earnest and attempt to convey that they are concerned with our safety while at the same time refusing to even have a a discussion involving rotating shifts and excessive over time. Just because we don't possess engineering degrees doesn't mean we are stupid. Please do not insult our intelligence, it is beneath both sides. Work/life balance is non-existent. There is also to much of a blanket over reaction to everything that happens here regardless of it being safety, quality or anything else. Instead of addressing the issue with those directly involved we have to pull the entire site/department or whatever into the situation to "ensure it never happens again". Here is the problem, you're dealing with equipment designed by human beings and other human beings operating it. There is not a possibility of never having an issue. If NASA has shuttles blow up what is the likelihood of us not having no one ever screw up putting a soap in a bottle? Pretty much not possible and it is arrogant presumption to expect otherwise. The real reason behind all of this is that it takes bonus money out of managers pockets and makes it harder for them to get their next promotion. End of story. There is a reason managers rotate to different sites or roles every 3 years or so. It is so they can step on whoever for whatever they need and not have to face those people in the long term. Again, please do not insult our intelligence by assuming we're too stupid to figure this out.

2.0
Apr 17, 2012
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Competitive salary Yearly raises Profit sharing Relocation benefits Many options for relocation if desired Great operators on the floor Non-union (at Mehoopany Plant)

Cons

Leadership does not deal with/get rid of managers who are not performing - just move them around to other departments Very poor communication within the site and from corporate around important items Extremely frugal for a company of their size - difficult to get money to even put through important safety projects Do a great job of coming up with ideas to make morale better, but never seems to follow through Morale at the plant on the floor and with managers is very poor Seems like upper management doesn't really care about the people

1.0
Oct 27, 2011
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Almost all people at the "Group Manager" level or below are phenomenal people both personally and professionally.

Cons

Management doesn't care about people, they make it well known that you are replaceable. Nothing like being told you can be "promoted" and then you can't find an open job at the level so they tell you to either take a job at a lower level or leave the company. Management will give conflicting direction within the same call: increase production but lower inventory, reduce capital but go out and buy all this stuff.

Viewing 286 - 288 of 14,345 Reviews

Glassdoor has 21,335 Procter & Gamble reviews submitted anonymously by Procter & Gamble employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Procter & Gamble is right for you.