Qualtrics reviews

3.6

61% would recommend to a friend

(2,604 total reviews)
avatar

Jason Maynard

38% approve of CEO

42% positive business outlook

Qualtrics has an employee rating of 3.6 out of 5 stars, based on 2,604 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Qualtrics employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Information Technology industry (3.9 stars).

Reviews by job title

3K reviews
1.0
Nov 30, 2021
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

"XM" means "Experience Management" not "Experienced Managers"

Cons

During my almost 3 three year tenure at Qualtrics, I had 4 managers and 3 tech leads. Each manager was less experienced than the last. Each tech lead was less experienced than the last. Promotions were based on who showed the most promise. Not who completed the best or most effort consistently. Close to zero data was used to make these promotion decisions. The quarterly 360 performance review system is a complete joke. The OKR system is broken. I went through 10 review cycles at Qualtrics. During the first three, I was exceeding or meeting expectations. As time went on, the expectations of output grew wildly. Every quarter you just stretch your OKRs to exceed your own performance from your previous quarter, even if you are meeting expectations. By the time of my 6th review cycle, almost two years into my role, my responsibilities on my team grew by a multiple of ten. Yet, I was held to a much higher bar because five previous stretch goal quarters had been "meeting expectations". After quarter #6, my mental health had declined beyond self-repair due to this incredibly soul-destroying system. I disclosed my clinical depression diagnosis to my direct manager. He shrugged it off and did not discuss my options with me. It didn't affect his trajectory after all, right? Aaaah, I can smell the Amazon from here. Anyway, due to this morbidly terrible goal-setting system they have, due to the garbage dump of a management team, I became unable to stretch my goals further. The following two quarters I became an "under performer" while holding over triple the responsibilities in my job role than the day I was hired. By my 9th quarterly review, working the hardest I have ever worked for a company in my life, I was placed on a PIP due to purposefully saying "No" to further day-to-day responsibility requests from management. I left my role clinically depressed, an alcoholic, and with imposter syndrome that affected the trajectory of my career in a hugely negative way. If you are a New Grad looking for a job, avoid Qualtrics at all costs. For your own good. Beware. If you are a mid-level engineer looking for a new role, go work for Amazon. Same management experience, better pay. As I am submitting this review for a role I left in 2019, I am happy to report I have recovered from my depression caused by my job at Qualtrics. Two years later, in 2021.

2.0
Sep 29, 2019
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- You have the chance to work with great people - In a space which is top of mind for nearly any executive - My direct manager and many managers in the Dallas office truly care about AEs succeeding personally and professionally - Commitment to continuously improve AEs sales skills - Ryan (CEO) has created a Go to Market machine

Cons

As a recommendation if you are interviewing in Dallas, ask how many salespeople were in the office 2 years ago and then ask how many of those people are still around today. That should tell you all you need to know. The Dallas office had a great base of people, but they ultimately were burnt out by micromanagement along with poorly aligned territories and continuous hiring of lesser talent at higher AE levels to fill growth goals. Top sales leader's "my way or the highway" approach is only based on past experience of how things previously were at Q before the introduction of the XM idea (many have never been at other orgs in their careers). In this pre XM era the Q salespeople focused on selling low dollar research deals where X inputs (calls, meetings, opps, etc) directly correlated to Y outputs (sales) as all deals use to be about the same size. This has not adapted over time and has led management to OVER focus on the inputs vs the outputs. In reality as Q has moved into the XM space, the way you approach strategic vs transactional deals should be very different as these deals greatly vary in size. People who hit quota typically have 1 deal that amounts to a massive amount of their quota, however if you focus on the large deals your quadrant performance goes down and you are repeatedly badgered by management to make more calls with the eventual threat of being put on a plan. When they tell you how many people hit quota dig in deeper to understand what percentage of fully ramped AEs in Dallas hit quota. Q leadership does a great job of presenting numbers the way they want them interpreted. With territories already misaligned across the org and Q just announcing that they will be expanding from 2.5k employees today to 8k, I'd be nervous to see how much worse territories could be in the near future.

3.0
Mar 21, 2019

Nice people, misguided leadership

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Friendly folks, generally happy work environment

Cons

A decade of product debt, lip service to customer experience, but no commitment to change. Also, any public dissent is frowned up, as it means you're not a team player.

Viewing 70 - 72 of 2,604 Reviews

Glassdoor has 2,858 Qualtrics reviews submitted anonymously by Qualtrics employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Qualtrics is right for you.