Raytheon reviews

Lack of clear vision and direction: The company's overall vision and direction were often unclear, making it difficult for employees to understand their roles and contributions to the bigger picture. Siloed structure: Communication and collaboration across different teams were challenging due to the company's siloed structure. Information sharing was often limited, and it felt like each team was operating in its own bubble. Challenges for new hires: Integrating into the company as a new hire was difficult due to the complex organizational structure and lack of onboarding support. It felt like I was thrown into the deep end without a life jacket. Limited opportunities for innovation: The siloed structure and lack of cross-functional collaboration stifled innovation and creativity. It felt like new ideas were often lost in the bureaucracy.

* Management has a TON of Peter Principled inepts just shuffling things around and looking busy while absolutely nothing - ever - changes. Ever. * Zero interest or attention to employee retention. When HR was asked about this, directly, in a company all hands the response was: "Oh well, we're trying to recruit actively!" The misunderstanding of the question felt like the most honest answer we'd heard yet. * Limp recruitment. People are going to work on crypto or AI. Not defense. Not in the USA, anyway. *Raytheon has STD. It's pretty gross. Stands for Silo'd To Death. The nature of what we do creates 'containerization', which breeds inefficiency. In a healthy company managers will work together to combat that inefficiency, such as duplication of effort or forking standards. Not here. Here we just roll with it. Interdepartmental battles, pariahs, gluttonous power lords with absurd ideals (Cyber, looking at you, bud!), and dopey managers just looking to slide by enough time to get their next promotion are the way of the day.