Remote reviews

3.4

59% would recommend to a friend

(174 total reviews)
avatar

Job van der Voort

66% approve of CEO

57% positive business outlook

Reviews by job title

174 reviews

Reviews about "Culture"

Return to all reviews
3.0
Jan 20, 2026

Good company for remote work

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Good benefits, salary, work flexibility

Cons

Company culture - They will hire and fire there is 0 job security even for top performers.

avatar
Remote Response
4mo
Your feedback is appreciated, and thank you for calling this out so transparently. It is great to hear that benefits, compensation, and flexibility have been positives for you. At the same time, we are sorry to hear that the culture has felt unstable and that you have experienced a lack of job security, even for strong performers. That is a serious concern, and it is not the kind of environment we want to create. We also hear your message to leadership about hiring and workforce planning. Building teams sustainably and making decisions with more consistency and care is critical to maintaining trust, clarity, and a healthy culture. Thank you again for sharing your perspective.
4.0
Jan 13, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- Very generous compensation package - Organized processes with room for innovation - Respect for work-life balance

Cons

- Growth can be hard in small teams - Recognition can be difficult in fully remote environments - Some portions are very automated and optimized while others are limited in engineering capabilities

avatar
Remote Response
4mo
We appreciate you sharing such balanced feedback. It is encouraging to hear that the compensation, work life balance, and overall structure have supported you, while still leaving space for innovation and new ideas. Your notes on growth in small teams and recognition in a fully remote environment are also important. Those are real challenges, and we know they can affect how supported and visible people feel. The point about uneven engineering capabilities and parts of the platform maturing at different speeds is helpful context too. Thank you as well for the advice to management. Keeping pace with changing priorities while strengthening the core processes that make scaling easier is something we are actively working on. Feedback like this helps us focus on where improving the fundamentals can have the biggest impact.
1.0
Dec 29, 2025

***BEWARE*** Run the Other Way- FAST!

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

None — including flexibility. Despite positioning themselves as an asynchronous, remote-first company, the reality does not reflect this. Communication is often delayed for days, sometimes over a week, and typically requires repeated follow-ups or management escalation to receive a response.

Cons

Where to begin. Despite messaging around growth in the Americas, the company heavily favors EMEA, and teams in AMER/APAC face significant challenges. While leadership speaks often about expansion, the organization lacks the operational maturity and basic service offerings that are standard among competitors in this space. The company positions itself as differentiated through transparent pricing, in-country expertise, and strong customer support; however, this has not been my experience. Pricing has shifted from simple and competitive to heavily monetized, with many basic services now charged for that are free elsewhere. When asked to justify these changes or explain added value, clear answers are rarely provided. Sales was significantly over-hired without the operational infrastructure to support growth. Many deals stall or never fully implement, leading to frustrated customers and reputational damage. Communication during implementation is often poor, and prospects are sometimes asked to rely on references that do not reflect the same products or services being sold. Leadership turnover has been frequent, with executives and employees let go abruptly and with little transparency. One of the founders has stepped in to lead sales multiple times following executive departures, creating ongoing instability. While the company promotes strong values, the reality feels very different—executive leadership often leads with fear, which trickles down through management. Many managers lack industry experience and are hesitant to advocate for their teams. Decision-making is unclear, and managers are often afraid to speak up. There is little structure, and finding accurate information is difficult. The so-called single source of truth is consistently outdated, forcing employees to search through multiple Slack channels with conflicting answers—often only to be blamed later for having incorrect information. Compensation is another major issue. Commission plans change frequently—sometimes mid-quarter—and errors are common. Reps must audit commissions every month, and corrections can take weeks, occasionally rolling into future pay periods. Operations and sales are deeply misaligned. Implementation timelines are often months out, causing deals to fall through. Operations has no accountability tied to revenue outcomes, which leads to frequent pushback on new business and lost opportunities. Outside of EOR, product offerings are limited and difficult to sell competitively. The company continues to lose strong talent due to product gaps, poor execution, and unstable leadership. Overall, there is a significant gap between how the company markets itself and the day-to-day reality. If you are looking for stability, strong leadership, and well-supported products, this IS NOT the right place.

Viewing 10 - 12 of 174 Reviews

Glassdoor has 799 Remote reviews submitted anonymously by Remote employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Remote is right for you.