Remote reviews

3.4

58% would recommend to a friend

(609 total reviews)
avatar

Job van der Voort

65% approve of CEO

56% positive business outlook

Remote has an employee rating of 3.4 out of 5 stars, based on 609 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Remote employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Information Technology industry (3.9 stars).

Reviews by job title

609 reviews
1.0
May 22, 2025

Systemic Toxicity & Unstable Dysfunctional Co-founders

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- No office (and that's about it)

Cons

Once the envy of competitors, now just a meme in competitors' Slack chats. Remote is a broken company, a former shell of its former self. If you're considering multiple offers and Remote.com is one of them, reject it and consider a better option. You'll save yourself from gaslighting, toxicity, and stress. The ship is sinking fast, with every day serving as a reminder that even rock bottom has a basement with Remote's name on it. Remember when you accept an offer at a company like Remote, you're trusting them to pay your salary. It's toxic co-founders and terrible leaders leverage this against employees, hence you will never experience a more unstable, erratic employer that cannot be trusted, that will wear your mental health down. You'll feel job insecurity like never before and wonder if and when you will be fired. I've been at Remote for over 3 years so have seen it fall from grace. I, and I'm sure many people reading this, have more respect for ourselves than to put up with such an awful employer like Remote. I warn anybody reading the glossy handbook or fake reviews, Remote is not what it used to be which is evident from the number of thumbs up on real reviews here on glassdoor. Remote started as a great company to work for. They followed human values, and the workplace culture, although challenging, was exciting and visionary, reflected well in the company's growth. After witnessing Remote self-implode over the past 4 years, several crucial problems have led to its ultimate downfall. A Portuguese 'boys club' exists among various ranks, creating endless political issues. For a company that spreads messages about inclusivity and fairness, Remote is rife with internal cultural politics, including judgment based on your accent and origin. Their hiring practices are discriminatory, excluding high-cost and high-talent places like New York, San Francisco, London, and other major cities in favor of lower-cost economies. This has resulted in inexperienced individuals occupying senior positions for minimal pay. Or worse, hires being made from toxic individuals who instil an awful culture beneath them. There's so much gaslighting at Remote. It's common for people to be given severance or orchestrated performance management low reviews. If you know too much or a deep expert, you'll be replaced for people who don't ask questions or don't look strategically at the consequences of short term decisions that are rife in Remote. The President co-founder flip-flops around roles due to his inexperience in business. He resorts to picking enemies dependent on the day of the week and is known for his tantrums. A leader with no vision, direction, or strategy, he relies on top-down finger-pointing and blame. He fosters a culture of tribes and toxicity where you're just a number, told what to do, and reminded that you can be replaced. "If you don't like it, take the severance" is a famous phrase used in company-wide Loom recordings. The other co-fonder starting to take a similar approach. In a company where the design function reports into engineering, it tells you all you need to know. This means teams lack true support to challenge the board and co-founders. It's created a systemic toxicity where feedback only works one way—if any stakeholder is seen to 'block engineering,' all hell breaks loose. On the flip side, Engineering are made to work long and hard hours in the name of ‘Intensity’. Benefits are basic at the country level, offering the bare minimum on top of tight pay bands that aren't competitive in the wider job market. Remote takes advantage of people who aren't near cities where jobs are readily available as a method of 'retaining talent.' Good people endure the toxic culture while remaining deeply unhappy as they’re unable to find a better job in their local areas. Recently, the 'unlimited PTO' perk was reduced to a recommended 30-day policy, where anything above must be approved by expensive C-Suite committee meetings—clearly a way to discourage holidays beyond 30 days but gaslit as being still ‘unlimited’. So what about working at Remote? You'll receive no trust from leadership, face micromanagement, and be scapegoated for the failings of your inexperienced leadership team. Many people disappear without notice, mainly due to behind-the-scenes severances and silent layoffs. When a company decides to get rid of so many people, you realize the company is the problem, not the individuals. There are no pay increases or bonuses and promotions are nearly unheard of, so expect your career, growth, and pay to stagnate working at Remote. You'll have to beg, borrow, and steal for any kind of money. If you like this culture, negotiate hard at the start and don't back down—they'll never offer to increase your salary after you join. Daily life consists of a facade of fire drills where everything is urgent and important. Whilst everybody is burned out, the other co-founder left a 2025 strategy Loom explaining it's going to be an even more intense year, asking everyone to "step it up another gear." Combined with a lack of company strategy and direction, this has prompted good talent to leave for far better companies as they realize their own worth. I’ve never worked at such an unprofessional, demoralizing place, with incompetent leadership where middle and lower management are scapegoated so that the senior layer can protect their own behinds and retain their own jobs and mask their poor performance, skill and ability in their own roles.

avatar
Remote Response
1y
Thank you for taking the time to share your feedback. We're genuinely sorry to hear that your experience at Remote has not met your expectations. Remote was founded on a bold mission: to create equal opportunities everywhere. Today we are pursuing this important mission in a fast-moving, highly competitive, and economically uncertain environment. Building a resilient, high-performing company in this context requires constant adaptation, tough choices, and a shared sense of ownership from everyone involved. We continue to grow and welcome new team members from around the world (including both within and outside of major talent centers) because we believe great work can come from anywhere. Our culture is demanding by design, built to foster accountability, impact, and continuous improvement. We’re proud that many people thrive and grow in this environment, advancing their careers as they take on greater scope and responsibility. We also understand that this intensity must be sustainable, which is why we encourage everyone to manage their own life-work balance, including taking advantage of the day-to-day flexibility we offer and the recommended minimum time away from work. We appreciate your feedback, despite it being hard to hear. We’re committed to listening and evolving, and we welcome those who want to help build what comes next. Thank you for being part of the journey.
1.0
May 3, 2022

Authentic reviews started appearing

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- oh you can work from a cafe? mind = blown. Will you please notice my post on LinkedIn, so that I can get promoted for it? Performance? What's that? - I feel like the good things at Remote have been marketed so hard here already, so let's focus on the cons. (Hence the incredibly unrealistic score averaging at 4.7 right now?! Meanwhile I bet that less than half the company would recommend it to a friend). Honestly, even the person from Remote that'll be reviewing this review would probably give it a 3/5 at best and is probably overworked.

Cons

- Let's start with Remote's supposed values. I'd probably cry if I weren't laughing right now, but they're corporate level of a straight up _ _ _. Not only are they not followed by anyone except probably the beginner ICs, even bringing up explicit proof of them not being followed to senior management yields 0 results. - Speaking of management, I'm not sure what they do at the company. First off, their primary job requirement should be to manage their reports' performance + well-being. Honest to god I think that people from outside the company would be a better judge regarding internal performance. They're completely blind to anything except average performers that are loud enough. Sometimes, even yelling about obvious stuff gets you nowhere. Well-being? Forget about it. You'll just hear the usual 'that's growth' - no it's not, growth can be bearable. This is leadership incompetence, end of story. You don't listen to feedback, end of story. Do you seriously think that all of your employees never worked at a high growth startup previously? - Speaking of past experience, I feel like we've included the 'past positions verification check' at the end of the hiring cycle due to the absolutely insane amount of people with borderline _ _ _ _ _ _ resumes that ended up working at Remote. This probably applies to most verticals and most seniority levels. I've never in my life seen so much supposed newbies that could literally do their director's job better. I have no idea how they landed their jobs, but I honestly applaud them for it, it's a skill. So many vague, unfit and dubious backgrounds sold as 'diversity'. - The fact that Remote is a startup is being used as an excuse to not work on any constructive feedback or criticism, yet is also used as an excuse for all the wrong things we're currently working towards. 'We're a startup, we learn as we grow'... You're full of yourself is what you are, and so is anyone thinking that no one's opinion but theirs is worth considering. - Nothing's being communicated to a n y o n e except Directors and above until it's about to launch. I'm talking about changes with huge implications for everyone involved, I'm talking about internal processes (z e r o transparency and well played sessions acting as 1:1s, designed to keep you quiet, so you'd maybe forget about your issues because they'll surely not be worked on). - Money spent on e n a b l e m e n t meanwhile no one's e n A B L E to do _ _ _ _. I don't want to be rude, but sometimes it felt as if the operational efficiency of Remote at 900+ people is about the same as when it was at 150. There are roles that everyone's unsure of in terms of why they're there. Typing up one deck or page a month, that no one will even take a look at? Leaving one comment after days that could've been the other person's 5 minute search? A company full of specialist that specialize in what exactly? - I'm seriously thinking that Remote is blissfully oblivious when it comes to the amount of people with one foot out of the door... Everyone I spoke to is considering quitting due to the above reason, it's only a matter of time before they disclose it. - Besides the above reasons, there's also the problem of personal growth at Remote. It's non-existent. You either got here early enough when the promotions were being done randomly or you're stuck with the new bureaucracy. This is painful to watch because not only would the people that got promoted initially n e v e r get the promotion now, those same people are still being promoted further, and the vicious circle and grasp of incompetency deepens. - Remote probably wasn't ever true about its mission, and the only reason it's being enabled by top tier VCs (same as its competitors), is because it's about to bring a new form of quasi equality to employees worldwide. In reality, Remote isn't even bringing equity to anyone. Most of the company is probably being paid the bottom threshold salary, which is likely around or below the costs that they'd have to pay for either way (in order to rent an office, pay for the electricity, internet costs etc.). This is of course mentally ingrained so the employees would work their _ _ _ _ _off and be thankful for the 'chance'. - If people only knew about everyone's salaries - this is why, of course, salaries aren't public or transparent. But this is common practice, don't speak about your salary to anyone else, because we know we've done something wrong and it'll create a _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ if it ever gets out. God forbid we fix this, because then we'll truly be nondiscriminatory, and not just _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ so we'd share it on LinkedIn, our blog or wherever else. Hope that the above is helpful to all the future candidates thinking about working at Remote, previous hires as a validation of their reasons to quit, and current employees, as a testament of the current state of the company, so you'd carefully reconsider whether it applies to your team as well. Remote was great back in the day and I hope for its sake that it'll get there again.

avatar
Remote Response
4y
Thank you for sharing your concerns with us. We’re sorry you didn’t have a good experience during your time at Remote. We always want to improve and do better, so although can’t agree with all of your statements this doesn't take away from any of the feedback you were willing to share and it won't go unnoticed. We are disappointed to hear you felt that personal growth & well-being was not a priority here at Remote. Currently we are in the process of our [bi-annual performance review](https://www.notion.so/people-Performance-reviews-feedback-c1c5a8ae0b06494b9ae9c97fbfc130b4) and yesterday was our quarterly [self care day](https://www.notion.so/people-Self-care-day-c3b5b63d959b4a4c952caee907c163af). We also see these areas as a day-to-day priority by offering access to [Modern Health](https://www.notion.so/people-Modern-Health-Mental-Health-and-Wellness-Support-4280d4896b5a4f3490367b80c7b9297a) and a [learning budge](https://www.notion.so/people-Benefits-perks-1e48a5869c274f40910b76d405b92f63)t. With regards to your comments on salaries, we are very proud of our [Remote’s Total Rewards](https://www.notion.so/people-Total-Rewards-1945bce8d3924ece9421ba8630f57b0c) philosophy. This is to ensure fair unbiased compensation and fair pay along with competitive benefits in all locations in which we operate. We can’t say we agree on your take on how promotions were or are done at Remote, we truly believe that everyone that has developed into [their new roles](https://www.notion.so/people-Career-paths-blueprint-886e5de833c840a8bc267821f78fb650) either by promotions or internal transfers truly deserved them and were the right fit for the role according to the feedback and accomplishments. We always appreciate an opportunity to listen, learn and grow - so if you would like to provide further feedback please reach out to our People Enablement partners via people@remote.com. Many thanks, Remote People Team
1.0
Apr 1, 2025

Went from good to toxic

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- You can work on your own timezone with no expectation to be online at a certain time. - Flexibility to organize your work day depending on your situation, running errands, medical appointments and personal matters is not a problem.

Cons

During the last 3 years this company went from a cool fast growing startup, boasting allowing to work from anywhere, kindness as a value, interesting work, lots of agency to one of the worst places I have ever worked. - Extremely toxic leadership. This comes from the top, co-founders are rude, disrespectful and often create very stressful hostile work environment. They dress it up as a "performance culture" and let us know that if we do not like it - we can be easily replaced. - Career advancement is borderline impossible. The only way to get promoted is to have a manager and, more importantly, director above you who have a lot of sway to push you through. It is routinely observed that promotions are not merit based but nepotism based. Even if you direct manager wants to give you a good performance review, you can be demoted by leadership because they think too many people cannot perform well. This depresses the salary adjustments which do not even reach the level of inflation in most cases. - Benefits are very basic and not great. Do not believe what you see in job descriptions. Flexible time off means limited time off, it is still okay but it is not unlimited. "Work from anywhere" benefit is not exactly true, they do not like to hire in USA due to costs and if you want to move while employed to a more expensive region, they will not move you and you will have to quit the job. USA Health/Medical benefits are very bad and very expensive. - Silent layoffs. Company has been doing a lot of silent layoffs, firing people for reasons only known to them and then not addressing it at all. One day you wake up and your colleague is no longer there, with no explanation or message. It is very distressing and obscure, it has chilling effect on company culture where nobody is talking openly and everybody is talking in DMs or side chats. There is no trust between employees and leadership. It is hard to overstate how different this company is from what it was 3 years ago. From a fun, high velocity, high agency and free spirited environment to a corporate drone culture, check-in-check-out workday, leadership sharing fake motivational messages and sycophants celebrating it. I would choose any other company to work for.

avatar
Remote Response
1y
Thank you for taking the time to share your detailed feedback about working at Remote. We appreciate your candor and transparency, even if the comments are not easy to hear. We understand that increased performance expectations and organizational changes can feel at odds with Remote’s earlier stages of growth. However, these changes reflect our commitment to building a sustainable, competitive business that can continue to provide opportunities for our team members in the long term. Regarding specific concerns: - We're actively working to improve communication around our performance evaluation process to ensure it remains fair and transparent - We continue to offer significant flexibility in work arrangements, though we must balance this with business needs and regional considerations - We acknowledge that changes in team composition could have been communicated more effectively While we've evolved from our early startup days, we remain committed to fostering an environment where talented individuals can do their best work. We encourage you to contribute to the internal ongoing dialogue about how we can better support our team members while building a sustainable business in today's competitive landscape. Thank you again for providing this feedback. It will contribute to important discussions about our company culture, management practices, and employee experience.
Viewing 154 - 156 of 609 Reviews

Glassdoor has 792 Remote reviews submitted anonymously by Remote employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Remote is right for you.