Remote reviews

3.4

58% would recommend to a friend

(609 total reviews)
avatar

Job van der Voort

65% approve of CEO

56% positive business outlook

Remote has an employee rating of 3.4 out of 5 stars, based on 609 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Remote employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Information Technology industry (3.9 stars).

Reviews by job title

609 reviews
1.0
Apr 23, 2025

Leadership Is Sinking the Ship - Stay AWAY

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

1. The people below the manager level are genuinely great — talented, collaborative, and fun to work with. They're the ones keeping things running. 2. Remote work is supported, which provides flexibility (though not always respected in practice — more on that below).

Cons

I've been with this company long enough to witness its rapid decline, which began soon after an aggressive expansion phase. Below are the core issues that have made the work environment increasingly toxic: 1. Founders: Both founders exhibit extreme egotism and have a habit of publicly shaming employees. They frequently jump into different teams with random, often nonsensical, last-minute demands. While occasional urgency is part of any job, this has become a norm — and it piles on top of already high-priority work, overwhelming teams and destroying focus. 2. Leadership: This is, hands down, the most incompatible leadership team I’ve encountered in my career. No one challenges the founders' unreasonable requests. Leaders from different domains are misaligned, often pushing their own conflicting agendas without any coordination. There's no unified direction — just chaos. Teams are pulled in every direction (product, sales, customer success, founders’ whims), and no one at the top is willing to prioritize. Yet, it's always the teams that are blamed when things don’t get delivered. 3. Blame Culture: The company is driven by a top-down culture of blame. Leadership never takes responsibility for strategic failures. If you attempt to challenge or reason with them, you risk being fired or pushed out through subtle (or not-so-subtle) mistreatment. 4. Shifting Values: The company’s values change constantly. Currently, the only one that seems to matter is "Intensity". There is no care or empathy from management — just pressure and performance demands. 5. Talent Drain: Most of the good people have already left or are actively planning to. I’ve seen many great colleagues leave — some pushed out, others leaving voluntarily due to politics and the toxic culture. 6. No Clear Direction: There's no longer a clear product vision. The company chases large customers, building one-off solutions with no long-term strategy. Instead of scaling solutions properly, teams are forced to jump from one custom build to the next without fixing core issues — making it nearly impossible to build something sustainable. 7. Leadership Is Out of Touch: Executives seem completely disconnected from the day-to-day reality. They push unrealistic demands, assuming things are easy — without any understanding of how much work teams are juggling. Miscommunication is rampant, and the gap between what is asked for and what is delivered is often laughable or tragic. Despite having multiple products, the founder insists on "keeping it simple" — no documentation, no coordination — just fast delivery, which only deepens the chaos. 8. Nepotism: While some level of familiarity is normal in leadership, this company takes it to an extreme. Most leadership positions are filled from the founders' personal networks, creating a toxic echo chamber. These leaders have unspoken expectations not shared or documented, assuming everyone should just "get it." They forget that they’ve hired globally, and not everyone shares the same cultural mindset. If uniformity is what they want, they should stop claiming to value diversity. 9. Time Zone Issues: Though they claim to support "async" work, expect late-night or early-morning meetings if you're not in the favored time zones. Many leads and managers regularly work at unhealthy hours just to meet others' sync demands. Final Thoughts: If you’re considering joining this company — don't. And if you're already here and struggling, know that you're not alone. Many of us, across different departments, feel the same toxicity every day.

avatar
Remote Response
1y
Thank you for taking the time to share your detailed feedback about your experience with our company. We couldn’t agree more that most Remoters are genuinely great — talented, collaborative, and fun to work with. We appreciate your candid thoughts about areas that need to improve around the company. We take this feedback seriously as part of our ongoing commitment to improving our organization. Your concerns regarding leadership alignment, communication, work-life balance, and company culture have been noted and will be discussed thoroughly with the leadership team. Thank you again for your honest feedback and specific suggestions for improvement.
1.0
Feb 5, 2026

This Environment Breaks People Quietly

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- Fully remote setup with great office gear - Great benefits if you live in a 2nd/3rd world country - extremely talented/knowledeable colleagues

Cons

This company caused long-term professional and emotional damage that took significant time to recover from. The environment is chaotic, reactive, and deeply destabilising. Roles are vague, expectations shift constantly, and success criteria are rarely clear. You are expected to absorb uncertainty, conflicting priorities, and emotional strain as part of the job, with little protection or guidance. When systems fail, employees are left exposed. Despite heavy internal messaging around values, care, and psychological safety, the lived experience does not match the narrative. Concerns are acknowledged verbally but rarely addressed in any meaningful way. The burden of “coping” is placed squarely on employees, while leadership avoids real accountability. There is a persistent sense of walking on unstable ground. You are required to perform at a high level while navigating ambiguity, internal politics, and unspoken expectations. Over time, this erodes confidence, mental wellbeing, and trust in leadership. By the time many people leave, they are exhausted, disillusioned, and questioning their own competence, despite the fact that the environment is the real issue. This is not a supportive workplace. It is an emotionally demanding, poorly structured organisation that relies heavily on people over-functioning to compensate for systemic failures. Leadership appears more invested in broadcasting their own brilliance than in building a stable, healthy organisation. The contrast between external posturing and internal dysfunction is impossible to ignore. I would strongly caution anyone considering this company to look beyond the branding and ask very direct questions about role stability, decision-making, and how employee concerns are actually handled in practice.

avatar
Remote Response
4mo
Thank you for taking the time to share your perspective. We appreciate you highlighting the flexibility of our fully remote model, the home office equipment provided to employees, and the many talented colleagues who make up our global team. Remote is a fast-growing startup that is still less than a decade old, and we are building the company as we scale it globally. In our handbook and hiring process, we are clear that working in this environment involves ambiguity and constant change as we continue shaping the organization while it grows. This kind of environment isn’t the right fit for everyone. The concerns you raised around role clarity, expectations, and how feedback is handled are important feedback for us. As we continue to grow, we’re investing in clearer job architecture, stronger onboarding, and additional manager enablement to help teams better understand priorities, expectations, and paths for growth. Building a global company at this stage requires constant iteration, and feedback like yours helps us identify where we need to improve. We appreciate you sharing your experience and wish you the best in your next chapter.
2.0
Apr 1, 2022

+1 to 'Great mission, poor leadership' - so true!

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- One of the most noble missions in tech right now, and ICs really are the only ones at the company living the company values (with rare exceptions). - Some teams seem unaffected by how downhill scaling up generally went for most teams at Remote - Extremely supportive colleagues - Flexible working hours - Generally okay salary if you're based outside of the US/Western Europe

Cons

- Async = desync + dysfunctional most of the time - 'Flexible PTO' - you can hear sentences referencing studies done that prove 'people take less PTO if PTO = infinite' from leadership; loop holes behind taking PTO rendering almost impossible to go on PTO unless you really need it and want to put your colleagues at risk of being even more overworked - Leadership is mostly comprised of people without the proper experience in leading teams of such a size + most of them aren't a good fit for the vertical they're leading (some came from completely irrelevant backgrounds with no subject matter expertise) - Leadership is imposing a passive culture onto the company (assertiveness isn't welcomed and leads to people that work hard suffer the most due to no action being taken for others that completely abuse the flexibility they're offered) - I completely agree that some people from the leadership teams should PR check their statements before making them public (a lot of 'jokingly said' stuff that could basically be considered mobbing if the 'joke' part would be taken out + no one's laughing, they're intimidated so good job, I guess) - Awful prioritization of things in general - leadership is pushing for completely irrelevant things that no one asked for. Neither users nor employees internally; 'transparency' non existent - as it was said, it's more of a 'we tell you the bad news 2 hours before they're commenced to happen' - SO many operational problems and dysfunctionalities between the teams, that are painfully obvious even to more junior hires at the company - Extreme disbalance between some salaries, even for people in the same team - Candid feedback isn't welcome, full stop - may have been better a year ago, not today. Mostly the reason behind 'anonymous' feedbacks being prioritized as of late (the People team seems to have realized how people actually feel about transparency and feedback) - Completely subjective promotion structure; no meritocracy and straight up bad choices being made in this context (and often)

avatar
Remote Response
4y
Hi there, Thank you for sharing your thoughts with us. We truly believe feedback can bring a lot of value to the work we do day to day and drive meaningful change, especially when it's constructive and clear. We’re truly pleased to learn that you find the team around you supportive and aligned with our values. We’re are building our hiring process and all our people-related processes around our values, we are using them daily in all the things we do and we are therefore really glad to hear it's showing in the team. With regards to the cons and advice to the management you have shared, we acknowledge your thoughts and we have read them thoroughly and we will always remain thankful for all constructive feedback and feedback in line with Remote’s Values. Remote is still in our early years, some things will change quickly and at short notice - that's just the nature of being a fast-growing company - and we have built resources on how to approach change, available to all team members. Some things might not change as quickly, depending on the company goals and core needs of our employees and our customers. Considering you are a current employee, we would love the opportunity to work with you and want to highlight that we are always willing to listen, therefore please reach out to our People Parter team or utilise AllVoices for anonymous feedback. We always want to grow and improve and will continue to lean into creating an incredible environment for everyone and do better.
Viewing 157 - 159 of 609 Reviews

Glassdoor has 792 Remote reviews submitted anonymously by Remote employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Remote is right for you.