Ryerson reviews

3.7

70% would recommend to a friend

(439 total reviews)
avatar

Edward Lehner

88% approve of CEO

78% positive business outlook

Ryerson has an employee rating of 3.7 out of 5 stars, based on 439 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Ryerson employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Manufacturing industry (3.5 stars).

Reviews by job title

439 reviews
5.0
Apr 22, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Flexible timing and great work environment

Cons

Need to improve sales for company

avatar
Ryerson Response
1mo
Thank you for being part of Ryerson for over eight years and for taking the time to share such a positive review. We’re glad to hear you value the flexibility and positive work environment, and appreciate you being part of our team.
2.0
Apr 3, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Good structure and decent pay

Cons

Little opportunity for raises and promotions

avatar
Ryerson Response
2mo
Thank you for taking the time to share your feedback. We appreciate your perspective and the thoughtful advice you’ve provided around growth and management. Your comments have been shared internally as we continue to look for ways to support and invest in our employees.
3.0
Mar 27, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Ryerson has a long, respected history in the industry and a solid foundation. There are still many dedicated professionals on the sales desks and in the plants who work incredibly hard to support their customers despite increasing internal hurdles.

Cons

The culture has shifted from "Fighting with Tools" to "Fighting with This Tool." Leadership has become incredibly top-heavy, making decisions that affect daily operations without consulting the people actually doing the work. Forced "Innovation" & Technical Debt: Management is obsessed with in-house apps that are pushed out prematurely. These tools are often half-baked and create double work, yet adoption is forced so leadership can brag about "usage metrics." Meanwhile, the core ERP system is stuck in the mid-2000s (approx. 2005/2006). The App team and ERP team are in a constant blame-game, leaving bugs unfixed for months while OTD (On-Time Delivery) suffers. The "Yes-Person" Promotion Cycle: Promotions are increasingly based on likability and compliance rather than skill or merit. This has created a layer of management that simply repeats directives they don't understand. If you ask "why" or offer a data-backed alternative, you are viewed as "not a team player," and management will look for reasons to push you out. Operational Stagnation: Great ideas from sales reps and plant employees are routinely shut down by people well-removed from the day-to-day. The company has become so top-heavy that the "boots on the ground" no longer have a voice. Resource Mismanagement: The introduction of "Fulfillment Reps" was a good concept, but it was executed by gutting the sales team or removing the best reps from the field. Salespeople are now bogged down in admin work instead of selling, leading to burnout and high turnover. Pay & Workload: The turnover rate is high because the pay does not reflect the increased workload caused by inefficient tools and "metric-padding" at the plant level to mask late deliveries.

avatar
Ryerson Response
2mo
Thank you for your 10 years at Ryerson and for sharing your feedback. We appreciate you taking the time to provide your perspective, and your comments have been shared with our HR team for review.
Viewing 4 - 6 of 439 Reviews

Glassdoor has 498 Ryerson reviews submitted anonymously by Ryerson employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Ryerson is right for you.