Scientific Games QA and Development reviews

1.9

10% would recommend to a friend

(6 total reviews)

Patrick McHugh

Not enough data to show CEO approval

1% positive business outlook

Reviews by job title

6 reviews
1.0
Nov 1, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The company used to be really good culturally, not anymore. Pay is good. Manageable work life balance

Cons

Of late, the company has become very toxic. There is a lot of politics in play. You have to be 'liked' by your manager, else even if you are a high performing individual they are playing unnecessary dirty games. There was a recent change in leadership and since then there is a lot of bootlicking to be in good books with the new leader. Those who don't are being targeted.

avatar
Scientific Games Response
4mo
Thank you, your feedback is appreciated. We take concerns around culture and leadership seriously. We aim to provide a supportive environment for all employees. We also review internal communication and engagement practices often and continue to improve. We encourage team members to share feedback directly through HR or anonymous channels so we can address issues promptly.
4.0
Jan 22, 2025

Quite, and wellmanaged

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Good superiors in Budapest, and nice colleagues

Cons

Micromanagement from Vienna office, and legacy solutions.

Viewing 1 - 3 of 6 Reviews

Glassdoor has 1,477 Scientific Games reviews submitted anonymously by Scientific Games employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Scientific Games is right for you.