Skip to contentSkip to footer
      employer cover photo
      employer logo
      employer logo

      Scientific Games

      Engaged Employer

      Scientific Games QA and Development reviews

      1.9

      10% would recommend to a friend

      (6 total reviews)

      Patrick McHugh

      Not enough data to show CEO approval

      1% positive business outlook

      Ratings by category

      4.5

      Culture & values

      4.5

      Work/Life balance

      3.9

      Diversity & inclusion

      3.6

      Compensation and benefits

      3.2

      Senior management

      3.0

      Career opportunities

      Ratings by demographic groups

      Reviews by job title

      6 reviews
      4.0
      Feb 1, 2024

      Good place to work

      Qa engineer
      Recommend
      CEO approval
      Business Outlook

      Pros

      Good work life balance, flexibility, leaves

      Cons

      Unnecessary polictics, no latest technologies,

      4.0
      Nov 11, 2023

      Review

      Quality assurance
      Recommend
      CEO approval
      Business Outlook

      Pros

      Good community, culture and values

      Cons

      No downside can be commented on.

      4.0
      May 18, 2022

      Chill environment

      Qa analyst
      Recommend
      CEO approval
      Business Outlook

      Pros

      9-5 job.. not much hassle

      Cons

      No wfh.. office is middle of nowhere

      Viewing 4 - 6 of 6 Reviews
      Related searches: Scientific Games QA/Development jobs | Scientific Games QA/Development salaries | Scientific Games benefits | Scientific Games interviews
      Scientific Games reviewsScientific Games QA/Development reviews

      Glassdoor has 1,477 Scientific Games reviews submitted anonymously by Scientific Games employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Scientific Games is right for you.