SharpSpring Software Developer reviews

3.6

79% would recommend to a friend

(9 total reviews)

Rick Carlson

68% approve of CEO

54% positive business outlook

Reviews by job title

9 reviews
5.0
Feb 15, 2021
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

+ Senior engineers/team leads are exactly what a budding engineer could hope for: patient, knowledgable, and willing to lend insight both in matters in and out of scope for their respective teams. + Tech stack includes modern languages/libraries (React + TS, Apollo Client/GraphQL, and Golang among the primary tools used for new feature work). + Dedicated architecture team meant to pay down the legacy monolith's tech debt and optimize the programming experience for other engineers! + Consistent acknowledgment of experience/growth (Jr., SE I, SE II, etc.) and internal focus for leadership opportunities (i.e. team lead).

Cons

- Agreement with leadership (including Product and Product Marketing) on goals and/or timelines for feature delivery can be unrealistic at times, on occasion flat-out implausible (this is a pain-point that seen some improvement over time, I will concede). - C-Suite leadership has a heavy influence on project direction, on occasion causing sizeable pivots while planned work is mid-stream. - Code-level testing needs to be prioritized more. Even modern features have sporadic coverage of varying degrees of quality - Some sort of dev team building or on-the-job growth opportunities would be nice (i.e. 10% time, company hackathon).

2.0
May 5, 2019
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

For the most part the company doesn't hold back in using right technologies for the right tasks

Cons

Software engineering management lacks basic leadership skills. Beware of layoffs due to budget constraints. They don't invest in employee development and come out as cheap.

1.0
Jan 26, 2019

Nope Nope Nope

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

New office Free lunches occasionally Good resume booster

Cons

If you want the bottom line on how engineering culture is, read on. Although the company sells software, the CEO views engineering as a bill or cost-of-doing-business rather than a partner at the table. The rest of the culture "blossoms" from there. Your performance is measured on how many points you can close, and that is the final word. If you can't close X amount of points per week, you get put on watch. If you don't improve, you're shown the door. This culture encourages average engineers to learn how to game the system to look good, and good engineers are managed out of the company or flat out leave to work for companies that will value them. Outside of engineering, it's hit or miss. The farther down the food-chain you work, the more likely you are to enjoy your job. Once you have ideas of moving up in the ranks, you better get in with the Good Ol' Boys club or you don't stand a chance. If you think your creativity or hard-work will be rewarded, think again! The ones who get promoted are in fact the ones who are skilled in "appearing valuable". Instead of solving problems for the customer, they create arbitrary problems and solve those instead, making it appear as if they are necessary. Eventually they find a nice spot in the company where they can sit in an office and watch Twitch streams all day, spend a few hours a week "grooming the backlog" and yell at people who aren't closing enough points.

Viewing 4 - 6 of 9 Reviews

Glassdoor has 140 SharpSpring reviews submitted anonymously by SharpSpring employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if SharpSpring is right for you.