employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Southern California Edison

Engaged Employer

Southern California Edison reviews

3.9

79% would recommend to a friend

(1,755 total reviews)
avatar

Steven Powell

77% approve of CEO

64% positive business outlook

Southern California Edison has an employee rating of 3.9 out of 5 stars, based on 1,755 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Southern California Edison employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Energy, Mining & Utilities industry (3.8 stars).

Reviews by job title

2K reviews
2.0
Sep 14, 2015
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

If you are the type of employee who wants to punch the clock, do what you're told and leave at 5 -- with no ambition to advance your career or do work that you're proud of - SCE may be a good fit. The employees who do best are the ones who genuinely don't care what they're working on, they're just happy to have a well-paying job with benefits. It helps if you have an external reason to stay - like your kids' tuition or the need to pick your kids up before 6 or a kitchen remodel you otherwise couldn't afford. SCE pays above market value (probably $20K-$30K more than the average marketing-manager job), and most members of the team work banker's hours (8 - 5, with a long, leisurely lunch in between).

Cons

If marketing is what you do for a living, and you take pride in doing it well, proceed with extreme caution. Here are 7 things they won't tell you during your job interview: 1. SCE is a monopoly; the only thing that the company markets is its own programs, offerings and rate increases. The marketing department is really a marcom department with no ownership, oversight or say-so in the company website, social media or any digital channels. Your "big campaign" might be a boring, legalese-filled letter to customers that their rates are going up. 2. You won't actually do any marketing. Your job is to be the go-between. Management will tell you what to do; you will tell the agency what to do; you will shuffle content from the agency to dozens of internal stakeholders; you will make sure the agency gets paid on time. You will literally become a "project manager," instead of a marketer. True story: the Marketing team was in a training class and had to guess what an acronym stood for. A roomful of marketers got stumped on C for creativity. Because Creativity is the first skillset that gets rusty when you walk through Edison's doors. 3. You will probably be brought in as an analyst, a title that has an almost secretarial connotation at SCE. You will do the exact same work as longtime employees who have a "marketing project manager 1" or "marketing project manager 2" title, you'll just get paid less and have almost no chance of achieving parity with your peers. 4. 90% of the work of the entire 20-person marketing department is carried on the shoulders of about 5 mid-career women who are never promoted or recognized. Nearly all of the group's scant promotions have gone to young men under age 35 - most of whom left the company shortly after their promotions. It is a career dead end of the most depressing order, especially if you work hard and were born with ladyparts. (While everyone else goes home at 4:59, the 5 workhorses of the Edison apocalypse stay late and grind away at the same old letters, emails, flyers and brochures.) 5. Get out that "I love the 90s" t-shirt, because you are now stuck in a world where direct mail rules, CAN-SPAM is a strange new law, and the Internet is an afterthought. Through no fault of your own, you will no longer be able to do BASIC digital marketing or follow BASIC best practices. SCE's IT infrastructure is in shambles, and no one has the vision, the knowledge or the desire to improve it. 6. Marketing sits in the Customer Programs and Service (CP&S) organization, which is part of the Customer Service organization. CP&S is about to go through a layoff/reorg, and has been in a perpetual state of turmoil for the last 3 years or more. The company had a disastrous reorg in 2013, where employees were demoted and shuffled around willy-nilly. In 2014, the head of CP&S was terminated for an "ethics violation." And the fun continues into 2015 and 2016, with a new management team that was clearly brought in to clean house. 7. CP&S in general and Marketing in particular are treated as executive internships. They don't hire people who are great at Marketing to lead Marketing; SCE has so little respect for the function that they use it as a training ground for executives on their way up. And that's before you talk about the brain-numbing bureaucracy, the insipid "safety moments," the lackluster middle managers, and a culture of kissing butt and backstabbing your peers. In short, if you are bright, creative, ambitious, hardworking and passionate about marketing, SCE will feel like a death sentence. If all you want is a paycheck, you may be genuinely happy here.

2.0
Aug 22, 2015

Executives in Charge of Operational Finance have Issues

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

This once great company is undergoing fundamental change driven by industry, political, and technology pressures and changes. Salaries and employees benefits are still better than market average.

Cons

Executives in charge of Operational Finance (formerly Planning and Performance Reporting) are major part of the problem, not part of the solution. In 2013, Executives in charge of the centralization of a previously distributed finance department created a mess. They severed many strong performers, selected a management team based upon favored but unqualified "yes" people (a.k.a. Lapdogs). Management choices were disastrous and less than two years later half of them were terminated. Recently, in July 2015, the Company has had to downsize the Finance Department again, severing about half the employees (70+) only to post jobs to hire 20 replacements, claiming the new hires are necessary because the fired employees lacked necessary soft skills (e.g., ability to agree with management, ability to work as part of a team). Remaining Finance employees are working crazy hours, morale is terrible, and "survivors" are looking for opportunities to leave.

2.0
Mar 19, 2016

Used to be a great place to work

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The people, salary, and benefits are great! Four years ago my rating would have five stars. Over my ten years, I moved up in the company and worked for some amazing leaders and work. However since 2013, we've gone from 19,000 employees to 13,000 employees. The company is undergoing continuous restructuring with no end in sight. Employees are no longer valued and seen as useless by executives and board of directors...when the reality is the executives are useless because they restructure in a vacuum. Employee are not engaged in the process of "making improvements". Through this journey of constant uncertainty, high-performing, loyal employees are self-selecting to leave the company to avoid the possibility of being walked out.

Cons

No standards Takes a long time to make a decision Bureaucratic Silo Too many priorities

Viewing 10 - 12 of 1,755 Reviews

Glassdoor has 2,123 Southern California Edison reviews submitted anonymously by Southern California Edison employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Southern California Edison is right for you.