employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Student Conservation Association

Is this your company?

Student Conservation Association reviews

4.0

91% would recommend to a friend

(165 total reviews)

Jaime Matyas

55% approve of CEO

60% positive business outlook

Student Conservation Association has an employee rating of 4.0 out of 5 stars, based on 165 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Student Conservation Association employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Management & Consulting industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

165 reviews
5.0
Feb 20, 2018

Found My Calling

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

One of the best reasons to work with the Student Conservation Association is the quality of the people who both work there and apply to work there. It brings together people of all ages with a desire to work in the environmental field without being too restrictive based on experience - they are the best way to develop your background in environmental work, and they'll help you find your dream job along the way.

Cons

The only problem that I have with the SCA is also one of the reasons why they are able to be so great at what they do - turnover is high, as with most positions in the environmental field, because the bulk of the jobs they offer are low-paying. Since they are largely taxpayer-funded but have an ever-growing demand for work, they need people willing to do fun, exciting work for little.

1.0
Feb 5, 2018

No Communication, No Pay, Isolation

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

You get to work outside and work towards your "career" in conservation. Variety of jobs across America which have various roles in parks and other public lands.

Cons

Miscommunication from the organization to the parks they help. I arrived to my remote job to find out it was much less accessible than I was told by both the SCA and the park. I was told day one my position would not lead me to an actual job, and immediately was treated like I was expendable and almost worthless because my position was only 3 months. My adviser told me I shouldn't have even driven my car to the site because of the road conditions (after I had asked multiple times if my make and model would be suffice before I took the position.) I ended up having to leave early because of the job troubles, total lack of communication, and what I found to be unsafe work ethics. Months later I still owe the SCA money because I withdrew early. I got paid $85 a week to live in total isolation to "kickstart my career" and somehow I owe them money. It's a corrupt system when you are forced to volunteer just to even be worthy enough of a seasonal job that makes what should be the federal minimum wage.

3.0
Jan 30, 2018

Program Director

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

What's not to like about the mission? Youth, environment, work experience. A lot of great people - staff and interns - who are mission-aligned and have big hearts. The organization has deep history and has accomplished a tremendous amount.

Cons

The leadership was isolated in a rural part of the US and consequently was not able to embrace quickly enough the importance of having staff and policies/programs that reflected the urban communities it served. It's catching up in some ways but in many ways it was too late--and they lost a lot of the committed, innovative young professionals who reflect the diversity of our US cities and the youth we served.

Viewing 115 - 117 of 165 Reviews

Glassdoor has 313 Student Conservation Association reviews submitted anonymously by Student Conservation Association employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Student Conservation Association is right for you.