employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

The Washington Post

Engaged Employer

The Washington Post reviews

3.0

34% would recommend to a friend

(643 total reviews)
avatar

Jeff D’Onofrio

Not enough data to show CEO approval

10% positive business outlook

The Washington Post has an employee rating of 3.0 out of 5 stars, based on 643 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have an average working experience there. The The Washington Post employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Media & Communication industry (3.4 stars).

Reviews by job title

643 reviews
5.0
Oct 22, 2018
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- TWP has a great culture with a lot of transparency and collaboration across teams and orgs. - Career development and ongoing 'leadership/management' training is taken very seriously here; the HR team does an exceptional job - Heavy investment in product and engineering, but with shared common goal of enabling growth within the newsroom (talent, coverage, etc). - The DC office is beautiful physical space to get to work in every day

Cons

- Benefits could be a bit better (although to TWP's credit, they do seem to be getting better) - Could use a bit more top-down transparency around long-term strategy; I feel I get more insight into TWP's strategy from industry publications than I do from leadership - Speed is is a cultural pillar at TWP, but I've found it often comes at a cost

avatar
The Washington Post Response
7y
We're glad you've found The Post to be a great place to work. Our people set the culture of The Post and we're proud of it. Thanks for the feedback on the benefits, strategy, and speed. We'd love to hear more so we can continue to make The Post a great place to work for all. Feel free to confidentially e-mail us at life@washpost.com. Thanks again for the review and for being part of The Washington Post team.
1.0
Oct 3, 2018

Editorial

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Name recognition is great. It opens many doors, and you'll get access in many different public avenues for story coverage.

Cons

There is no room to grow. The rumor about the old-school leadership being "dinosaurs" is true. It's common to see editors and managers get promoted to their current jobs after great, illustrious careers as writers and reporters. A great reporter, however, doesn't always make a great leader. I've had more than a couple bosses that have horrible "bed-side manners" with volatile temperaments; they lack interpersonal skills. It speaks volumes that they just don't know how to treat their employees professionally. Lots of yelling and trashing people behind their backs, even at team meetings. There's also a culture of blame when mistakes are made. No one owns up. (For example, the photo team blames editorial for their lack of communication, and then the editorial team blames photo team for being slow and stubborn; vice versa). The different teams here do not work well together, and it doesn't look like it's getting better. Also, the pay is generally low and you have to work holidays, as the newsroom never sleeps.

avatar
The Washington Post Response
7y
Thanks for taking the time to give us honest feedback. We want to be a great place to work for all and your feedback is helpful in working toward that. We take your points very seriously as career development, breaking down silos, and training our leadership are important to us. Several years ago, we launched The Leadership Project, a program that nurtures a community of leaders looking to develop their leadership capacity and advance The Post’s mission. Through The Leadership Project, managers go through training and exercises to ensure they are leading well. In addition to The Leadership Project, we’re working with the Poynter Institute on advanced leadership training and the second class was completed last week. Inspired by both these efforts, we launched The Growth Project this year to provide all employees with opportunities to develop, learn, and collaborate with each other. Despite these two programs, it sounds like they were not helpful to you. In order for us to grow, we’d love to hear more about your situation. Feel free to confidentially and anonymously e-mail us at life@washpost.com. Thank you!
4.0
Oct 1, 2018
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

+working in an industry and company that really matters +very fast paced environment, if something is broken it's addressed unlike other companies that i've been a part of +the team I work is very experience so there's plenty of opportunity learn a lot and gain knowledge that will advance my career +the pay is consistent with the industry

Cons

+the benefits leave a lot to be desired +at least on my team, there is no opportunity to move up in job positions so most of the people on the team will probably leave the company after 2-3 years which is unfortunate considering how talented everyone is. +the management regularly has our team work outside of normal working hours

avatar
The Washington Post Response
7y
Thanks for writing a review and giving us feedback on what's working and areas we need to look at. In terms of career development, we recently launched The Growth Project, providing career development opportunities for all employees through talks, mentorship, and collaboration. We'll continue to look for ways to develop all employees. Thanks for being part of The Washington Post team!
Viewing 403 - 405 of 643 Reviews

Glassdoor has 713 The Washington Post reviews submitted anonymously by The Washington Post employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if The Washington Post is right for you.