employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

The Washington Post

Engaged Employer

The Washington Post reviews

3.1

35% would recommend to a friend

(641 total reviews)
avatar

Jeff D’Onofrio

Not enough data to show CEO approval

13% positive business outlook

The Washington Post has an employee rating of 3.1 out of 5 stars, based on 641 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The The Washington Post employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Media & Communication industry (3.4 stars).

Reviews by job title

641 reviews
3.0
Jan 14, 2009
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- Name recognition - Relaxed friendly work environment - Very intelligent coworkers

Cons

- compensation is considerably below industry average - senior level positions (director or higher) are almost always hired from the outside rather than internal promotions - complete lack of career development opportunities

avatar
The Washington Post Response
9y
Thank you for your review and feedback. We have a commitment toward growth and making The Washington Post a great place to work for all. We’d love to hear more specifics and if you are experiencing the same issues today. Feel free to e-mail us: life@washpost.com. Thank you again for your feedback!
3.0
Jan 3, 2009
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Pretty laid back atmosphere, no micromanaging, pay is decent. The people that work there are friendly.

Cons

Large company, you can get lost in the shuffle. There seems to be no focus in the company and the morale is very low right now. The newspaper industry is on a big decline and this has hurt The post as well.

avatar
The Washington Post Response
9y
Thank you for taking time to write a review. We've passed on your feedback to our team. Thanks for providing it and for choosing to be part of The Washington Post team!
3.0
Nov 30, 2008
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Even though the print industry is in decline, The Washington Post is looking for new ways to innovate and attract the advertising revenue that once came easy. They give very good compensation in the advertising section. It is fairly easy to move up to the 2nd tier in a couple years, but the senior management usually comes from outside. It is also very neat to run into interesting people in the workplace such as Bob Woodward and other prominent writers. Some people who have worked there for a long time reminisce the days when Robert Redford came into the office to reenact the Watergate incident for the movie "All The Presidents Men".

Cons

Staff training is not good at all. The sales strategies taught are not appropriate for the environment print advertising currently is in. Since advertising in print is a choice, representatives should be thought of as more consultants rather than sales people. The Washington Post still is under the mentality to train employees like high pressure car salesmen. Wahts more, there is a general incompetents regarding the computer systems, specifically dealing with how the online and print section communicate. The management are under intense pressure to keep revenue high and thus are not able to pay enough attention to how to solve problems within their system.

avatar
The Washington Post Response
9y
Thanks for taking the time to write a review. Along with our deeply rooted principles of integrity and trust, The Washington Post values ideas, speed, and ownership. We're glad you found The Post live up to our value of innovation. We've passed on the rest of your feedback. It's helpful in making us a great place to work for all employees. Thank you for allowing The Washington Post to be part of your career journey!
Viewing 637 - 639 of 641 Reviews

Glassdoor has 711 The Washington Post reviews submitted anonymously by The Washington Post employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if The Washington Post is right for you.