Skip to contentSkip to footer
      employer cover photo
      employer logo
      employer logo

      The Washington Post

      Engaged Employer

      The Washington Post reviews

      3.0

      34% would recommend to a friend

      (643 total reviews)
      avatar

      Jeff D’Onofrio

      Not enough data to show CEO approval

      10% positive business outlook

      Ratings by category

      3.6

      Diversity & inclusion

      3.4

      Work/Life balance

      3.2

      Compensation and benefits

      3.2

      Career opportunities

      3.0

      Culture & values

      2.0

      Senior management

      The Washington Post has an employee rating of 3.0 out of 5 stars, based on 643 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have an average working experience there. The The Washington Post employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Media & Communication industry (3.4 stars).

      Ratings by demographic groups

      Reviews by job title

      643 reviews
      2.0
      Feb 21, 2022

      More Structure Needed

      Technical account manager
      Recommend
      CEO approval
      Business Outlook

      Pros

      Great tradition, Cool offices, Exciting initiatives

      Cons

      poor information sharing lack of structure and clear communication

      5.0
      Feb 8, 2022

      Some stay for a few years, and some never leave

      Multiplatform editor
      Recommend
      CEO approval
      Business Outlook

      Pros

      Many people spend a decade or more here and find it fulfilling. Pay is not the highest in the industry but it’s certainly near the top. (New hires fresh out of college seem to start above $65,000.) If you’re passionate about what you do, love teamwork and collaboration, and want multiple opportunities to try something new, then stop yearning for a New York Times job and get yourself here. You don’t need to be a reporter to be valued here. Several managing editors weren’t. Mark is social media guru, and Kat is a design and product goddess, for example.

      Cons

      Before Sally Buzbee came in, the paper was sued — and is still being sued — by a reporter over top editors’ handling of her past sexual assault. Previously, the paper was run mostly by men, including by Marty Baron, who ironically prized the “institution” over “personalities,” which he saw as an affront to modern journalism’s obsession with balanced reporting. Now it’s run by several women, including Sally, who just gets it, if you know what I mean, and many managing editors didn’t rise up the journalism food chain as reporters, the prototypical way of ascending legacy media. Washington housing is expensive for everyone. So are on-site and nearby lunch options. Reporters are gods, but everyone else, especially if you work on the intersection of journalism and product, can hold their own too.

      Viewing 196 - 198 of 643 Reviews
      Related searches: The Washington Post jobs | The Washington Post salaries | The Washington Post benefits | The Washington Post interviews
      ReviewsThe Washington Post reviews

      Glassdoor has 713 The Washington Post reviews submitted anonymously by The Washington Post employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if The Washington Post is right for you.