Great institution, but due for some growing pains
Pros
Great people, overall, who care. The institution has an excellent reputation with undergraduate teaching and research. I stand by this. Fantastic leadership academically, overall. Freeman's leadership and connections/respect externally are a driving force behind this mid-sized institution's accolades and exceptional programs. He has created an environment that values education, inclusiveness, and support for students from all backgrounds to succeed.
Cons
Divisional level leadership is very much hit or miss. Ironically, if you took the years of service of the VPs and Deans across the institution and added them together, it would be three times the age of the institution. Why is this important? Because, if a single leader has been in a position for 30 years, there is an innate ability to adopt status-quo and mediocrity. This institution suffers from stagnant leadership, which will become increasingly apparent when Dr. Hrabowski leaves. Note: compensation for non-director level positions is mediocre. Benefits are part of the State system, so they are quite good. As always, tuition remission is a great benefit to full-time non-contingent employees.