Pros
An important consideration within any health care organization is the clinical vs. non-clinical perspective. This is a post from the non-clinical side based in Texas. USPI is an organization that challenges employees. Opportunities to develop technical skills and industry knowledge are available. Structure and expectations are well-defined. It is an adaptable organization with a competitive edge. “E.D.G.E” is, at this time, a key philosophical component described on the company website. A deep knowledge base of talent exists at the senior levels.
Cons
USPI is for profit. It is a business providing a service (health care). Founded in 1998, the business model and culture differs from organizations such as hospitals that began decades earlier. The emphasis on competition, expansion, and efficiency can leave those with more idealistic values in health care disillusioned. Clinics (ambulatory surgery centers) vary in their size and overall performance. The reality is that this relationship varies in complexity and level of cooperation with the home office. Individual centers are under a microscope as the very nature of USPI is dynamic and driven. Improved cooperation would certainly be a pro. The following cons were unique to my department, not necessarily a reflection of the entire company or locations nationwide. People employed less than 2 years with the company, partly due to rapid growth and acquisitions, were the norm in my department during the time of my employment. This, combined with manager turnover, created a lack of depth and maturity. Females under 30 were a successful demographic developing their careers in the department. Those over 40, regardless of sex, were rare. Like anywhere else, it pays to have an edge at USPI. I sensed a certain mold to be filled in order to have staying power. The majority of my coworkers pursued other opportunities within a few years.
