employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

World Economic Forum

Is this your company?

World Economic Forum reviews

3.0

36% would recommend to a friend

(337 total reviews)
avatar

Klaus Schwab

17% approve of CEO

34% positive business outlook

World Economic Forum has an employee rating of 3.0 out of 5 stars, based on 337 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have an average working experience there. The World Economic Forum employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Nonprofit & NGO industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

337 reviews
4.0
Mar 28, 2026

WLB/limited career growth

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Mostly WLB, global mobility, high-profile

Cons

Team culture could vary (can be toxic) and limited career progression

3.0
Feb 10, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Smart people, a lot of networking

Cons

Bureaucratic, moves more slowly than other organisations

1.0
Feb 7, 2026

Creepy Account Team Model

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Most colleagues have interesting backgrounds. They are knowledgeable and have very diversified experience.

Cons

In 2023, the organization undertook a significant restructuring of the business team, introducing the account team model that differentiated between “Partner Service Leads” (now they call it "Partner Success") and “Partner Leads.” Under this model, more experienced colleagues were positioned as Partner Service Leads, with an implicit assumption that their role would focus primarily on operational contacts. At the same time, newly recruited Partner Leads were expected to manage relationships with global CEOs and C-suite executives. In practice, this role separation has not materialized. Communications with partners remain highly centralized around operational contacts, and there is limited to no direct access to executive-level stakeholders for either role. This is the reality as companies will never allow you reaching out directly to their executives due to their internal communications process, leadership change sensitivity, partnership sponsorship status etc. As a result, both Partner Service Leads and Partner Leads are performing overlapping work, leading to duplication, inefficiencies, and confusion around accountability. The current structure has also unintentionally introduced perceived bias, as senior-level engagement opportunities are formally assigned to one role, despite the fact that the underlying access and responsibilities do not support this distinction. Overall, the model has created a gap between role design and day-to-day reality, reducing effectiveness and morale across the team. In practice, a significant portion of the substantive work—including relationship maintenance with operational contacts, coordination, preparation, and follow-up—is carried out by Partner Service Leads. However, the visibility and perceived ownership of partner relationships are often attributed to Partner Leads, despite their reliance on this underlying work. This dynamic has created a sense of unfairness, as contributions are not consistently recognized in line with effort or responsibility. Over time, this imbalance risks undermining trust, motivation, and collaboration within the team.

Viewing 13 - 15 of 337 Reviews

Glassdoor has 449 World Economic Forum reviews submitted anonymously by World Economic Forum employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if World Economic Forum is right for you.