X reviews

3.0

36% would recommend to a friend

(2,262 total reviews)
avatar

Linda Yaccarino

35% approve of CEO

32% positive business outlook

X has an employee rating of 3.0 out of 5 stars, based on 2,262 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have an average working experience there. The X employee rating is 22% below average for employers within the Information Technology industry (3.9 stars).

Reviews by job title

2K reviews
5.0
Jan 13, 2021
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

In general, there seems to be a strong company-wide sense of inclusion and empathy, which really makes Twitter stand out. People are very passionate about the role that Twitter has in society, and while there is constantly a lot of public backlash towards the leadership around critical decisions, internally, I think that there is a lot of trust in the expertise and intentions of other teams. As an engineer, I feel empowered to work on projects that I think are valuable and interesting without feeling entangled in internal politics. Twitter was one of the first companies to really devote themselves to WFH, and the transition was essentially seamless, since Twitter was already shifting towards remote work. In addition, there are "Flexible Work" opportunities, where employees can request to temporarily or permanently work out of approved locations, which is quite amazing.

Cons

There are frequent re-organizations (every 4-6 months?), and while you learn to roll with the punches, it makes it difficult to plan out longer term projects, since staffing & priorities end up changing. You end up having a handful of half-baked projects that die after one or two iterations.

2.0
Dec 12, 2019

Politics and nepotism

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The name and pay if you can negotiate. I would recommend always countering with 10% over original offer. opportunity to learn.

Cons

The close is too short so prepare to work a 50+ hour week. No work life balance. Hard to get promoted without navigating politics. obsolete systems. Certain managers are extremely weak. Nepotism is rampant.

2.0
Mar 4, 2018
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

For anyone interested in Advertising Operations within start-ups & bigger tech companies, this role provides really good introductory exposure to the general processes & terms. As far as general perks - the company also has free breakfast & lunch with 3 different cafeterias & a huge variety of food (which obviously doesn't hurt). To be transparent, I think just having the title "Twitter" listed on my resume was the most I gained from this job (which is saying a lot because I worked there for a year).

Cons

Management wise – I think there’s a pretty strong lack of communication & clarity throughout the Ad Ops department on a lot of different things. Going into this role, I assumed that there would be a very in-depth few weeks of training on the entire system of Twitter’s Ad Ops Department, as well as the products they supported. Instead, it was turned out to be 2 days of very general/vague Powerpoint slides, accompanied by the popular slogan “just mess around with it”. After those 2 days of training, it’s like they just assume you’ll learn everything else on your own. This may work for some people, but definitely didn’t seem to be the most productive method in my opinion. Since I started, I think the training process has improved with new Videos they’ve implemented, but I think there’s still a really difficult learning curve for people coming into the role largely caused by the training process not being as thorough as it can be. Managers & Superiors will often say you can always ask them if you have questions, but from my personal experience, I sometimes felt like it became obvious when you broke past their patience level with one too many questions. And again, I think the need for new people to ask so many questions in the first place could be prevented with a much more thorough training process. As far as the culture of the Office, I think there’s one gigantic elephant in the room: the Contractor vs Full Time Employee (FTE) distinction. Going into this role, you begin as a Contractor employee, meaning you work full time (40 hours per week) but you’re paid hourly (rather than salary) & don’t receive as many benefits. From my own time here, I think I feel pretty confident in saying that the majority of people really don’t want to be a Contractor employee. Most (if not all) people would prefer the FTE title if eligible. However, it never feels like anyone in Management is proactively looking at your potential & recommending you apply to specific FTE roles. They never mention any current FTE openings or offer any constructive feedback about what’s needed to be an FTE. You really have to do it 100% on your own. They estimate that around 1/3 of employees eventually become eligible for conversion to Full Time, but I only noticed a very small select few that this occurred for during my time there. Speaking from my own personal experience – I only received positive feedback on my work during my time there, but was still never recommended an opening for an FTE role or personal advice for how to progress professionally. This sometimes just made it feel like you were working a thankless job, where no one was really noticing what you were doing. And a lot of the FTE work was 100% in the scope of Contractors to be able to perform once given sufficient training. One could even argue that some of the work processes you do as a Contractor are just as challenging as the FTE work. Thus, it essentially creates a feeling where the work space is very clique-based dividing Contractors & FTEs. Management frequently say that they appreciate your work & everything you do, but in the same breath will explain that only FTEs are eligible for certain perks/outside of work events.

Viewing 61 - 63 of 2,262 Reviews

Glassdoor has 2,808 X reviews submitted anonymously by X employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if X is right for you.