employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

York Space Systems

Is this your company?

York Space Systems reviews

2.2

29% would recommend to a friend

(76 total reviews)

Dirk Wallinger

13% approve of CEO

29% positive business outlook

York Space Systems has an employee rating of 2.2 out of 5 stars, based on 76 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have an average working experience there. The York Space Systems employee rating is 39% below average for employers within the Aerospace & Defense industry (3.6 stars).

Reviews by job title

76 reviews
5.0
Dec 8, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- Interesting work - Contribute meaningful impacts on the final product - Collaborative engineering culture - Built out labs with the necessary tools to design and test - Internal growth opportunities. York regularly promotes from within rather than hiring externally. - Compensation and Benefits (100% Covered Employee Health Insurance) - 401k Match

Cons

- Typical small/mid-size company growing pains - Schedules can be unrealistic - HR software toolsets are terrible - The open floor plan can be loud

1.0
Nov 24, 2025

Stay FAR FAR AWAY!

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Good benefits and York covers all health insurance premiums.

Cons

Work Environment • When I first started, I had to fight tooth and nail just to get the design software I needed to do my job. I actually had to create my first few wireframes using PowerPoint, which is absurd. • Getting approval for basic hardware like larger flat-panel monitors—a standard need for design work—was also a huge hurdle. A good company should provide employees with the tools they need to do their jobs, no questions asked. Unless an expense is excessive, there’s no reason to be stingy over a $200–300 monitor. • There seems to be at least one person in IT who enjoys holding authority over hardware and software requests. It often felt like power-tripping for its own sake. Culture • The culture at York is terrible, and leadership knows it. They’ve made no effort to retain employees or fix the systemic issues.  ◦ Even HR is aware of this. The fact that York never responds to Glassdoor reviews says everything—they simply don’t care. • The turnover rate is astounding. The manager I initially reported to left after about a month. Several developers followed soon after, and the exodus never slowed down.  ◦ In under three years, I reported to six different managers, which is absurd.  ◦ The original product team I joined essentially dissolved due to turnover and constant restructuring. Without a stable product team, there’s been no clear direction or vision.  ◦ Eventually, the other designer and I ended up reporting to a lead developer—not an ideal setup for building strong products, especially since he had no managerial experience.  ◦ During multiple reorganizations, we were completely overlooked. No one discussed career growth or promotions with us, even as others around us advanced. • York implemented a mandatory three-day in-office policy over a year ago, which was completely unnecessary. When I started, I worked almost fully remote and came in only as needed—it worked great. The entire product team functioned well remotely, stayed productive, and met deadlines.  ◦ The belief that employees must be in an office to be productive is outdated. York’s decision to follow the return-to-office trend shows how little they care about what actually works for their teams.  ◦ It also felt like they just wanted to justify the expensive office space in Greenwood Village.  ◦ Some people may not work well from home, and that’s fine—address those cases individually. Don’t punish everyone else because of a few bad apples.  ◦ I was far more productive and happier working from home, and I know many others felt the same. • Let’s also talk about the York x Rockies sponsorship. Instead of spending millions of dollars every year to sponsor a baseball team, how about giving employees better bonuses?  ◦ Last year’s bonuses were around 3 percent, which barely covers the cost of living increase.  ◦ I’m sure the C-level executives still received their usual hefty bonuses.  ◦ Take care of your employees first. Prioritize them over sponsoring a struggling baseball team.  ◦ To make it worse, when the deal was announced, employees still had to pay for Rockies swag. Nothing was free—not even a hat or shirt. Design • York doesn’t value the software product or user experience at all. The focus is entirely on customer mission needs, with no real concern for product quality. • They continue to pay an outside design agency to create mission logos, maintain an outdated website, and produce marketing materials—even though they had two in-house designers with strong branding experience who could have handled it all and saved money.  ◦ The Dragoon mission logo, for example, is one of the worst designs I’ve ever seen. It looks like a mash-up of bad clipart and early AI-generated art. • If you have an in-house design team, use them. We would have loved to refresh York’s website—which looks like it’s from the late 1990s—and design better mission badges ourselves. Do yourself a favor and stay far far away from this company. It’s not going to get any better.

5.0
Nov 17, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- High-performing engineering culture (if you can keep up). The Space Vehicle Engineering organization is full of smart, dedicated engineers who genuinely care about building great products. The bar is high, and the people doing the work are impressive. - Fast-paced, high-impact environment. If you’re someone who thrives in a “scrappy” growth-company atmosphere, you’ll have a lot of autonomy and opportunity. Individual contributors—especially early in their careers—can take on significant responsibility and move up quickly. - Real industry momentum. The company is the clear leader for SDA programs and has enormous potential to dominate the small-sat industry beyond that. When it comes to building spacecraft quickly at scale, there are very few serious competitors outside of the giant that is SpaceX. - Improving leadership and direction. The newer VP of Engineering (internal hire) is doing a strong job addressing pay imbalances, leveling concerns, and stabilizing the org after some growing pains. Recent all-hands communication from the CEO was encouraging. - Upward mobility due to a young team. The company is primarily Gen Z and younger Millennial in engineering even at management layer, which creates huge headroom for growth, leadership opportunities, and fresh thinking. - Mission-driven mentality. The “builders” who stay here want to make things that matter, and the culture rewards those who put in the effort rather than those who coast on titles or past big-aerospace experience.

Cons

- Not for everyone—especially not for slow, complacent, or legacy-mindset engineers. Some former employees struggled with the pace, expectations, and accountability. Many negative reviews come from people who simply weren’t a good fit for a high-velocity culture. - Internal communication is a recurring weakness. Leadership has historically struggled with internal PR—announcing good news in ways that feel negative, being vague about business development, or failing to communicate the company vision clearly. This has caused unnecessary anxiety and distrust. - Growing pains from early hiring waves. A few years back, the company hired too many under-qualified “senior” and “principal” engineers from large aerospace companies who showed poorly in a fast-moving environment. While most of those individuals have since left or been managed out, that period left some lingering frustration. - Compensation inconsistency and communication. Raises and bonuses were modest for a couple of years, which upset some employees (fairly or not). The real issue was poor communication around expectations. Compensation is improving, but the previous mishandling left a mark. - Missteps in managing workload. The former VP of Engineering made a widely-disliked push for “mandatory” overtime during a crunch period, even though most high performers were already voluntarily putting in the time. That VP is gone, but the cultural memory remains. - Young company = fewer graybeards. While not actually a technical weakness (results speak for themselves), employees who expect a traditional aerospace environment with layers of SMEs may be surprised. The company is built on youthful energy and execution, not decades-old process.

Viewing 16 - 18 of 76 Reviews

Glassdoor has 81 York Space Systems reviews submitted anonymously by York Space Systems employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if York Space Systems is right for you.