Check out your Company Bowl for anonymous work chats.
Bowls
Get actionable career advice tailored to you by joining more bowls.
Followed companies
Stay ahead in opportunities and insider tips by following your dream companies.
Job searches
Get personalized job recommendations and updates by starting your searches.
Benefits reviews
571-580 of 759 Reviews
4.0
Jul 14, 2017
2.0
Jul 4, 2017
1.0
Jul 4, 2017
3.0
Jun 29, 2017
4.0
May 25, 2017
3.0
May 18, 2017
5.0
May 17, 2017
Anonymous employee
1.0
May 9, 2017
5.0
May 1, 2017
Anonymous Technical Support Enginner
3.0
Apr 26, 2017
Anonymous Principal Sales Consultant
Current
Los Angeles, California
Only 7 paid holidays. Oracle just switched to an "unlimited vacation" policy. Sick days allowed is reasonable but not generous.
1
Anonymous employee
Former
IMO it's a BS move. It's all subject to management approval, in turn contingent on the work the employee's plate, which is completely arbitrary in the sense that management can assign any amount of any complexity and then use that as an excuse to limit your 'unlimited' vacation. Plus some groups are so over-worked with backlogs of bugs and deliverables there could be potentially no good time to take any significant amount of time off.
They even sent out email to one department saying flex vacation could not be used to create a 4-day work week. The point is, it isn't unlimited or even close to it - it's merely a dumb and degrading euphemism. They might as well be insulting our intelligence. For example, if someone has 3 weeks of paid vacation a year they could have 15 4-day work weeks if they wanted to.
Who is going to be able to take a solid 2 weeks off in a row lets say? And then followed up with 1 week off a couple of weeks later, for example. Much easier to assure one could get that at key times
in a year when the company was obligated to provide or pay for n-weeks of vacation.
With this change, they forced everyone to use-up the vacation they accrued before letting them use their 'unlimited' flex vacation, and the company stopped accruing the sign-on agreed vacation days based on time served and role. So this immediately disenfranchised everyone who had made plans with a reasonable certainty that they would get the vacation. It's just a sleazy way to screw over workers IMO under the feeble guise of an improvement.
Meanwhile they haven't addressed the Winter shutdown - where they had people using their own vacation time then or be docked. So what if someone wants to take a week or two of paid vacation then? It sucks.
1
Anonymous employee
Former
IMO it's a BS move. It's all subject to management approval, in turn contingent on the work the employee's plate, which is completely arbitrary in the sense that management can assign any amount of any complexity and then use that as an excuse to limit your 'unlimited' vacation. Plus some groups are so over-worked with backlogs of bugs and deliverables there could be potentially no good time to take any significant amount of time off.
They even sent out email to one department saying flex vacation could not be used to create a 4-day work week. The point is, it isn't unlimited or even close to it - it's merely a dumb and degrading euphemism. They might as well be insulting our intelligence. For example, if someone has 3 weeks of paid vacation a year they could have 15 4-day work weeks if they wanted to.
Who is going to be able to take a solid 2 weeks off in a row lets say? And then followed up with 1 week off a couple of weeks later, for example. Much easier to assure one could get that at key times
in a year when the company was obligated to provide or pay for n-weeks of vacation.
With this change, they forced everyone to use-up the vacation they accrued before letting them use their 'unlimited' flex vacation, and the company stopped accruing the sign-on agreed vacation days based on time served and role. So this immediately disenfranchised everyone who had made plans with a reasonable certainty that they would get the vacation. It's just a sleazy way to screw over workers IMO under the feeble guise of an improvement.
Meanwhile they haven't addressed the Winter shutdown - where they had people using their own vacation time then or be docked. So what if someone wants to take a week or two of paid vacation then? It sucks.
Anonymous Alliance Director
Current
San Francisco, California
You no longer have to earn time off, you can just take what you need or want
Anonymous Senior Hardware Engineer
Former
Santa Clara, California
Comparable to other companies vacation plans
Anonymous employee
Former
New York, New York State
Vacation & time off is fair. They just started a flex vacation policy, which is a good change after the 'forced winter break'
2
Former
Atlanta, Georgia
Vacation is accrued at a reasonable rate and most managers are flexible with hours
Anonymous principle software engineer
Former
Burlington, Massachusetts
maximun was 18 days, which is on the cheap side
now there is no maximun, but you need manager approval for vacation days.
1
Current
Lehi, Utah
PTO and you can go negative with vacation hours.
Anonymous employee
Current
Bedford, Massachusetts
Recently, no vacation accrual policy has been implemented i.e. employee can take vacation as per his/her manager's discretion.