UWorld interview questions

The interview began well with a phone chat with HR. This took about 45 minutes and was generally positive. They then asked me to complete an assignment which consisted of two tasks. The first task was to write a sample passage and mock questions with answer explanations. The second was answering sample test questions and again explaining your answers. The assignment was lengthy but straightforward. I completed the task quickly (in about a day) and submitted it but did not hear back for several weeks. Finally, they responded and said that the sample did not "meet their standards" and critiqued a methodological question I included on my sample. Their critique was so off-base it was ridiculous. It was just plain wrong. For reference, I have a PhD from a top 3 institution in the field they were seeking content writers in and have taught the concepts I covered in my sample at the undergraduate and graduate level. I was so shocked at their response that I consulted with several colleagues to make sure I wasn't crazy, and everyone was astounded at the incompetency of the UWorld response, which misrepresented fundamental statistics/methodological concepts . I have since seen numerous other job interview reviews with similar experiences. I wish I had seen this before I applied, because it was honestly a waste of time. I am genuinely wondering if others' suspicions about applications being a way to get content for their q-bank is true because the whole process was shady. I will say the woman from HR who I was in contact with was kind and helpful throughout. I have no clue who reviews the samples or what their motive is, but I have never had a worse interview experience in my life. This is a job I was overqualified for and honestly only applied to because I was looking to scale back on work stress to spend time with my kids. My bad I guess.

Phone interview, face to face, design project, a survey to send to references and final face to face with VP. Your application gets passed on to team based on what recruiter thinks.