ASPCA reviews

2.9

46% would recommend to a friend

(292 total reviews)

Matthew Bershadker

45% approve of CEO

44% positive business outlook

ASPCA has an employee rating of 2.9 out of 5 stars, based on 292 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have an average working experience there. The ASPCA employee rating is 22% below average for employers within the Nonprofit & NGO industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

292 reviews
1.0
Mar 10, 2023
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Learned about what the ASPCA is really about.

Cons

I worked at the CARE department (which stands for Canine Annex for Rehabilitation and Enrichment) for 6 months and witnessed NO rehabilitation or enrichment while there. In fact, during the 6 months of my employment, 15 dogs were euthanized for simply not getting along with other dogs. Bear in mind, this number is not nationwide, these dogs were all euthanized in 1 location. Who knows how many are being killed nationwide by this organization. In addition, the job description was misrepresented during the interview process. I am not the only person to attest to this fact. We were told that we would be working closely with the behavior team (whom we rarely saw) and the medical team, providing care for these poor, mistreated animals. In reality, we were janitors. Are entire job consisted of cleaning the entire facility. The only interaction we had with the dogs was at feeding time and 10 minute walks (shorter walks if we were required to sit through protocol seminars which were nonstop and took precedence over dog care).

1.0
Jul 18, 2016

House of Cards

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Animal welfare work can be rewarding Salaries are above average for most staff Good benefits package Many additional financial perks

Cons

Management is all about money and personal fame, with animal care taking a backseat. Egos and abuse of power is out of control. Salaries are too high for the uneducated and inappropriately placed upper managers. There is zero regard for the employee's quality of life or opinion which ultimately trickles down to the deterioration of animal care. To speak up means termination. There is no one to go to report workplace issues unless you are prepared to be fired. Thousands of donor dollars are spent with abandon on lavish corporate meetings and unneccessary corporate campaigns. Serious indiscretions are overlooked while dedicated employees are terminated for revealing dangerous work situations that affect animal and employee health. Not for the weak- hearted due to encountering a lot of sad animal-related situations.

1.0
Dec 30, 2016

House of Cards

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The biggest pro is its potential. With the right president and board; proper HR oversight and practices, including holding senior management accountable and better staff retention by appreciating talent; and a more positive, less fearful environment, the ASPCA could truly be an impactful organization for animals nationwide. The ASPCA IS very mission-driven and I've never seen donations being wasted. (In fact, they keep cutting back staff benefits.) The real waste is the lost time and energy as a result of poor decision making. Another pro is the hard working and competent staff across the organization that do their best to help animals despite the various internal challenges undermining them.

Cons

I agree with much of the cons below. Just to reiterate some: utter disrespect and lack of appreciation for talented staff; favoritism, sycophancy, back-stabbing, out-of-control egos, and House of Cards-style cutthroat politics from middle management on up; zero transparency and a culture of fear and retaliation; employee dismissal/layoff practices that are devoid of dignity; frequent upheaval of strategy and focus based on the president and board's changing whims; lack of cooperation and cohesiveness between departments and sometimes within; and fear of and deference to the unqualified yet arrogant president, which keeps all the good senior staff from attempting to change anything listed above. I also like what a colleague said about the inane core values, and I 100% concur with the multiple statements about lack of diversity, which is truly despicable and unfathomable, and I'd also like to point out the blatant ageism. For those of you who are still considering applying here, also consider that there is practically no time off, no work/life balance, and no perks or tokens of appreciation (e.g. the occasional lunch, a holiday party, etc.). The pay is ok depending on the department, and the ASPCA is good resume fodder, but expect to work very hard for incompetent people who won't appreciate you.

Viewing 7 - 9 of 292 Reviews

Glassdoor has 336 ASPCA reviews submitted anonymously by ASPCA employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if ASPCA is right for you.