Achievement First reviews

3.0

35% would recommend to a friend

(999 total reviews)
avatar

Fatimah Barker

39% approve of CEO

21% positive business outlook

Achievement First has an employee rating of 3.0 out of 5 stars, based on 999 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have an average working experience there. The Achievement First employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Education industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

999 reviews
1.0
Oct 14, 2020

Terrible charter school

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

There are no pros to this charter school.

Cons

Supposedly helps students of color but has a militaristic system that is damaging to the children. Also, absolutely no budget put into the arts. They don't have any of the basics like languages, art class, etc. And they often don't have science or history teachers because of budget cuts or they make one teacher teach science or history across all of the middle school.

avatar
Achievement First Response
5y
I am so sorry to hear about your negative experience of AF - what you describe is very far from the experience we aim to create in our schools every day. For instance, for this school year, our top priority as a network of schools is for every student to feel that they are safe, loved, and learning. We also do offer history, science, and enrichment at all of our schools (and we have dedicated teachers in these disciplines). Some of our staffing may look different due to staffing or safety needs - especially this year during the pandemic. We have continued our commitment to specials and enrichment in a remote and hybrid setting and offering these subjects is an important part of school at AF.
2.0
Sep 1, 2020

No transferability

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Okay benefits, in terms of buying you supplies etc. Brand New HP Elitebook Free food once in a while

Cons

AF is a cult and it was super apparent after 2 weeks of working there. I have worked at other charter schools, so I am familiar with the special lingo and practices that many charter schools employ (they all use the same consultants). However AF was a really weird cult. I have never felt like the unpopular kid in high school, but I definitely did at AF. Co-workers are really cliquey and gossipy, I guess that comes with high turn over rates. They never really bother to be inclusive and friendly unless you've shown that you are willing to live through misery for a couple of years. My biggest problem with AF, however, was that there was zero transferability in the skills I was learning and practicing as a teacher. I often had to interrupt my instruction and feedback to tell children that their misbehavior was a level 1 or level 2 in point deduction. It goes something like: "What is so ironic about what our main character, level 1 eyes, is that he tries so hard to be the good guy, to help his family, level 1 pencil, but in turn he becomes the monster, level 1 silent, that he feared he would, level 1, become." That is ridiculous, and if I was a child I would not be able to concentrate or even really piece together what my teacher just said. Additionally, the way they want lessons structured and done, reading loops and spirals, is literally only for AF and not used by any other type of school. In my role previous to coming to AF, I definitely felt like I was learning so much about literacy and how children learn. At AF, I feel like I wasted a year on learning useless ways to assign level 1s and 2s, and lesson structures. They also have a really random way of tiering teachers, as a level 3, 4, our 5 teacher. What Ive noticed is that experienced teachers, ones that haven't ONLY worked at AF, are often quite different from level 4s and 5s. I thought level 5 teachers were ineffective and I don't think any other children at different schools, not brought up in the AF system since 1st grade, would learn anything from them.

avatar
Achievement First Response
5y
I am so sorry to hear this was your experience at Achievement First. As we prepare for this 2020-21 school year in particular, we are most focused on our students' feeling that they are known, safe, loved, and learning. The way we speak to students - and that includes tone, and the interruptions like the ones you describe - matters and plays a critical role in establishing a culture of belief and belonging. We discourage interruptions for regular classroom management/behavior check-ins in the way that you describe in your post. Our classroom instruction is based on best practices of teaching and learning -- we always aim for high-engagement with more “scholar talk than teacher talk”. The focus is on our students, their learning of the material, and their socio-emotional learning. What you describe is unfortunately far from the classroom experience we want for our teachers or our students, and we will continue working to ensure that we create exceptional student experiences.
2.0
May 12, 2020
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- Salary is competitive - Work-life balance is not bad compared to other charter networks - Fellow staff members truly care about the work they do and want to be the best at what they do - The school promotes socioemotional learning, not only academic

Cons

Staff culture is toxic. Feedback is unprofessional, abrasive, and does not contribute to development as a teacher or as a professional. Teachers are disrespected and leadership will, at times, tell you to your face that you clearly don't care about the students or the mission. You will be constantly told that you should provide feedback but when you do, you are told, once again, that you are not aligned with the mission and don't care about the students. Many of the members of leadership have little teaching experience. There is a principal in the network who only taught in a classroom setting for one year and several deans who only have 2 or 3 years of teaching experience. It also doesn't matter if you are a content expert in a specific course. If you are a physics teacher but they need someone to teach math, they will make you teach math. If you are an English teacher and they need someone to teach Spanish and you just so happen to know how to speak Spanish, they will make you speak Spanish. They will move you around how they see fit. Students with IEPs are not supported, even though AF will claim that they do support these kids. They will force students to take AP classes even if they are not ready. Students with special needs often feel insecure and unaccomplished as a result, even with teacher support. If a teacher brings up concerns like this to leadership, leadership will say that the full responsibility is on the teacher and that the student's IEP does not matter and should not impact this student's learning, which is an awful statement. What is even more disappointing is that teachers they claim to be less effective are removed from being lead teachers and are shoehorned into becoming learning specialists, which are co-teachers who work primarily with students with IEPs. As a result of this, students with IEPs do not get the support they need and are taught by teachers who are not trained in special education. I would not recommend teaching here, especially if you care about special education.

avatar
Achievement First Response
6y
This is incredibly difficult to read -- and it isn’t the experience we want anyone to have in our schools. I would love to talk about these issues with you further, please feel free to email me directly at PaulAstuto@achievementfirst.org, but I did want to respond to a few of the points you raise. We take staff culture seriously and our goal is to build strong school communities where adults and kids all thrive. Our philosophy is to provide support for any teachers who need it, and while it’d be hard to respond about any specific situation without knowing more, I can tell you that it is NOT our policy to move struggling teachers into learning specialist roles or have teachers teach outside of their content areas. We know sometimes schools have to make difficult decisions when they are understaffed, and that’s why we’re doing everything we can to make sure we are fully hired and that we retain our great teachers. In terms of AP courses- we do deeply believe in Advanced Placement access, and we’re always refining our approach to make sure we’re serving all students. We’re also committed to our special services programming-- all our schools have co-taught courses and interventions for our students with IEPs, and we train our teachers to support. Our special services leaders are trained on specially designed instruction and they are both resources and trainers at each school site. I am so sorry that your experience at AF was not reflective of the experience we work hard to cultivate every day, and I hope you do reach out so we can talk further.
Viewing 196 - 198 of 999 Reviews

Glassdoor has 1,021 Achievement First reviews submitted anonymously by Achievement First employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Achievement First is right for you.