employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Agilent Technologies

Engaged Employer

Agilent Technologies reviews

3.6

66% would recommend to a friend

(2,664 total reviews)
avatar

Padraig McDonnell

56% approve of CEO

54% positive business outlook

Agilent Technologies has an employee rating of 3.6 out of 5 stars, based on 2,664 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Agilent Technologies employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Pharmaceutical & Biotechnology industry (3.5 stars).

Reviews by job title

3K reviews
1.0
Feb 17, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great company for those who like constant change of business strategy. Fantastic stock buy back program designed to prop up stock price. Many VP's in China with direct reports from US and Europe, excellent place if you are looking to have senior leaders with high powered commando style of leadership. Major legacy product lines such as chromatography and mass spectrometry with declining margins about to be spun off or sold to raise cash for acquisitions in the fast growing genomics space. Very good net zero carbon emissions plan in place for 2050.

Cons

Company has been prioritizing short term profitability over long term viability for several years. Over exposed to China from supply chain and sales revenue. Very high turnover in executive leadership, some leaving for direct competition. Company loosing talent at all levels due to failure of leadership at the highest levels. New CEO bull in a China shop, destroyed more value than he has created. Balance sheet being dressed up every quarter to look pretty with complex accounting designed to evade scrutiny.

3.0
Dec 17, 2025

Good Company, dark period, hopeful it will pass

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- Exceptional Field/Customer-Facing Organization - Sales, Service, Application Engineers who drive the company's financial success in spite of internal apathy, lack of divisional support. - Excellent, Robust, Product Portfolio, albeit aging, due to lack of investment in solutions for markets outside of Biopharma and CDx. - Some good leaders in the lower echelons of management who still stand up for their teams and "manage up" in a very challenging managerial environment. - Current investment in updating a lot of internal business process systems which were long overdue for improvement. - Day-to-Day work in the field is still fun, enjoyable, with a great customer base and interesting problems to solve.

Cons

- New C-suite has implemented a "slash and burn" strategy to cut costs and Wall Street outlook in the face of slumping sales/aging technology due to a lack of R&D investment in the last decade. - New leadership's "organizational transformation" is largely viewed as an excuse to cut headcount, orchestrated by the same external consultants gutting the rest of tech/adjacent industry. - No clear path forward in terms of innovation, either through M&A or R&D. Most R&D orgs have been severely reduced through layoffs, and R&D projects "Streamlined" (canceled) with no clarity as to what development projects are still continuing. - The major cultural shift from a very charismatic, pro-employee leader and leadership organization to a very cold, uninspiring leadership team that clearly puts the bottom line first at the emplyees' expense has drastically reduced morale. Everyone is just trying to figure out which "workstream" their layoff is in. - Executive Leadership has done a pretty poor job communicating "transformation." Lots of hand-waving "goals" and "workstreams" with no clear vision. The only workstreams that have been executed are dramatic internal cost cuts for short term stock bolstering. The ones that will affect the long-term health and viability of the company (innovation, M&A, software development, automation, AI, etc.) all appear to have no real plan or strategy tied to them. - Most SVP+ leadership arrived there through nepotism, as opposed to merit, and it shows. Lots of yes men/women, with no experience in the organizations they manage, While I normally support promoting from within, to maintain what used to be a great company culture, we seem to have aggregated the shameless self-promoters/political animals at the top. I'm actually excited we've recently pulled in some leadership from outside the company. - HR routinely "benchmarking" against other companies in the industries and eroding benefits to "be more aligned with market standards" The last decade has seen the sales org lose access to profit sharing bonus, reduction in company car benefits/eligibility, a company-wide move from two bonuses a year to one (that sales still isn't eligible for), ever increasing healthcare costs for decreasing benefits, mediocre-at-best raises. It is unclear how we expect to retain the best talent and a culture of excellence by being "more like everyone else."

3.0
May 28, 2025

Agilent Technologies

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Was a great place for a work/life balance career. Under Mike McMullen, company culture was restored, because he recommitted the execs to investing in the staff and the environment.

Cons

Has always been hard to move new things through the bureaucracy because managers were judged more on short term completion of projects than on any long-term vision. However, bad that was, it was nothing compared to the chaos since Padrig McDonnell became CEO. There has been a blind gutting of functions, advanced R&D, etc. to meet some sort of recommendations from what one can only assume are very well-paid consultants. Still, in over a year of being CEO, we have not heard any articulate vision for what the company will emphasize beyond "customer first". Hell, you can hear that at Costco. What's the direction? What's the strategy? What advantages have we gotten from your consultant friends that the execs couldn't have learned by spending a day talking to contributors in the product divisions. After a year of him being CEO and about 3 years of getting his emails, none of my co-workers have been able to pull anything meaningful out of what is being said. I don't know why the board lets this go on.

Viewing 4 - 6 of 2,664 Reviews

Glassdoor has 3,201 Agilent Technologies reviews submitted anonymously by Agilent Technologies employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Agilent Technologies is right for you.