employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Agilent Technologies

Engaged Employer

Agilent Technologies reviews

3.7

66% would recommend to a friend

(2,676 total reviews)
avatar

Padraig McDonnell

56% approve of CEO

53% positive business outlook

Agilent Technologies has an employee rating of 3.7 out of 5 stars, based on 2,676 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Agilent Technologies employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Pharmaceutical & Biotechnology industry (3.5 stars).

Reviews by job title

3K reviews
2.0
Oct 22, 2023
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Agilent works hard to hire really good people. The HR team works to support a diverse employee population. You not working for the evil empire.

Cons

The organization is too buearucratic with too much overhead. The leaders focus more on frequent reorganizations and roll outs of new programs rather than improving how to actually run the business. While they have good values, the culture has created a mediocre organization.

1.0
Dec 6, 2022
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Good coworkers. Not much more positive.

Cons

Where to start… the pathology service dept is a complete fiasco. Do more with less attitude. All work no life. Management team is a good ol’ boys club with no women in leadership roles. Absolutely no growth opportunities within the department. Extremely limited in development, no cross training opportunities with other departments. Apply at your own risk.

3.0
Oct 13, 2022
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Great team. Smart, talented, professional peers with a variety of backgrounds and experience. Pay grades are not as bad as some other companies locally. Leadership within CMC ranges from great to tolerable

Cons

Upper management is failing to provide the tools needed for CMC to improve. Internally, CMC works well but there is no accountability for other teams whose input and documentation are critical to investigations. Instead of improving interdepartmental communication as proposed, upper mgmt continues to focus on productivity metrics of investigators. Working overtime is often needed to hit metrics but the role is salaried so additional hours are not paid. Return to office was dictated by upper mgmt despite being deeply unpopular. "Company culture" was the only reasoning cited despite the fact that CMC is only designated a few desks so the department is never all on campus together. A rotation system was established and now people are driving to the middle of nowhere campus to see the same group they work closest with. Upper Management's control of CMC's budget causes issues with hiring, raises, and promotions. Pay raises fail to approach local cost-of- living increases. Leads are forced to jump through hoops to advocate for their team members when requesting promotions. Even filling positions after attrition is dependent on executives to review the need and benevolently approve the job posting. In the meantime, employees shoulder the burden while trying to maintain metrics short staffed. A hiring freeze recently affected backfilling open positions as well. The cause was ostensibly economic. Employees company-wide were asked to do more with less, though it's unlikely the economic concerns which led to the freeze will impact executive bonuses.

Viewing 157 - 159 of 2,676 Reviews

Glassdoor has 3,217 Agilent Technologies reviews submitted anonymously by Agilent Technologies employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Agilent Technologies is right for you.