Avantor reviews

2.9

40% would recommend to a friend

(1,284 total reviews)

Emmanuel Ligner

41% approve of CEO

31% positive business outlook

Avantor has an employee rating of 2.9 out of 5 stars, based on 1,284 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have an average working experience there. The Avantor employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Pharmaceutical & Biotechnology industry (3.5 stars).

Reviews by job title

1K reviews
1.0
Nov 2, 2014

Only work here if you can't get a job any place else

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Work-Life balance can be good for some positions – mostly those at the plants. Beyond that there isn’t much, unless you are a poor performer in which case they will likely just ignore you and give your responsibilities to one of the few people left that accomplish things.

Cons

There are too many negatives to list. The only reason to work here is that no one else will hire you. This company epitomizes what happens when private equity investors purchase a company with the sole purpose of reselling it. Too bad for the former Mallinckrodt Baker that they were purchased by incompetent amateurs. They did a poor job investigating what they were purchasing, and then failed horrible with their attempts at improvements. Their SAP implementation went belly-up and they made poor overseas investments. Since they can't improve the value of the company, they can now only make cuts to help increase profits. Working here, you will be underpaid and you will pay much more for benefits than you will at other companies. They reduced tuition reimbursement and are going to cut 401k contributions from 6% to 3%. The cost of benefits constantly goes up significantly, and the raises are pitiful. They removed bonuses for salary employees. Turnover here has to be astronomical. There are no training opportunities because they won’t pay for it, and there are no career growth prospects here. There is no stability here. The CEO’s leave constantly, which should tell you everything. Due to the poor financial performance of the company, almost no positions are refilled once someone resigns. The HR department is deplorable. They can’t even get interviews setup properly, and everyone in the company seems to have disdain for them. Most of them appear completely disinterested in the company. The HR rep didn’t even show up for my exit interview and sent her admin instead. My guess is they don’t want to be in a position where they would have to defend the company. It would have been funny to ask her what she thought the reason for such high turnover was. This group sent out an announcement that they were reducing severance packages from 2 weeks/yr service to one week/yr service...then the following week started doing lay offs. The previous year they did layoffs just before Christmas. This is a place that wants to be thought of as a high tech chemical company, but has no innovation, worthless IP, dilapidated assets, and no significant science or engineering work occurring. People with backgrounds in sales and marketing will be in charge of science and engineering related programs/departments.

1.0
Oct 27, 2014

Mallinckrodt Baker was awesome: 5 stars. Avantor simply the worst: 1 star.

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Employees, mostly veterans below Officer level have very good understanding of their respective business areas. Very flexible, short communication lines.

Cons

Until 2010, Baker was a dream of a company to work for. Excellent reputation, good advancement possibilities and personal development. Challenging work in an open environment. I was proud to say I worked at Mallinckrodt Baker. Then, everything changed. Owner Covidien sold Baker to New Mountain Capital, which for some reason decided it wanted to play Chemical Company, and renamed it Avantor. New Mountain should have been very good at installing good management and making sure strategic goals were in sight. Instead, they appointed the former cadre at Rohm & Haas which had not been taken over by Dow Chemical during their take-over. For a good reason: these people had no idea how to lead a specialty chemical company. Even the much praised Chairman, former CEO of R&H, turned out not to be able to stabilize management. After the take-over and after the former global leadership team of Baker had received its pay-out and left, New Mountain discovered the company was not doing as well as anticipated. I would think an investment company would be better at assessing financial situations and outlook. So instead of investing, they went in to venture capitalist mode: cut-backs, austerity and layoffs. Now, most of the competent people have left. Top management has completely changed at least 4 times over the past 4 years (with 5 or 6 CEOs), the reputation of Baker has been severely damaged and the outlook is not well. A failed SAP implementation resulted in major loss in revenue (after multiple warnings by experts that it would be a disaster). Most BUs were severely impacted by layoffs: lab, electronic and pharma. Most disturbingly, marketing and R&D positions were cut which is a bad sign is you are in an innovative business. Increased talk of outsourcing to India and China and basically firing everybody who disagrees. Top management seems to only be there for own advancement and not to help build the company. If this sound too bad to be true, I hope it was. I really enjoyed working there and was quite successful as well. But it pains me to see what my former colleagues have to suffer at the hands of career-minded people whose egos are writing checks their abilities cannot cash, hoping they will have rotated into the next career before anybody finds out.

2.0
Oct 21, 2014

Unstable

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

The people here are generally excellent, especially out on the factory floor and up to middle management. The plant continues to operate safely and efficiently because of that, and little else.

Cons

No strategic vision. No planning other than "get stuff out the door really fast." Management claims things like safety are a priority, then turns around and cuts funding or pushes out safety-critical projects. Constantly worrying about if your job is going to suffer the "lean" ax. Capital goes to projects based purely on favoritism. Management is done by fad and crisis, resulting in a high-stress environment where you wonder why you bother working on anything.

Viewing 1270 - 1272 of 1,284 Reviews

Glassdoor has 1,444 Avantor reviews submitted anonymously by Avantor employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Avantor is right for you.