Cengage reviews

2.8

30% would recommend to a friend

(2,407 total reviews)
avatar

Michael Hansen

38% approve of CEO

23% positive business outlook

Cengage has an employee rating of 2.8 out of 5 stars, based on 2,407 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have an average working experience there. The Cengage employee rating is 25% below average for employers within the Media & Communication industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

2K reviews
2.0
Jun 22, 2014

Lack of leadership and focus

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Overall, the company did a great job through the bankruptcy and kept calm in that uncertain time. Getting through bankruptcy and continuing the business is a big challenge, and I think the CEO did a great job managing the bankruptcy process. Our group creates high-quality products that do address customers real needs. In the department I work in, collaboration is valued and we all work well together as a team.

Cons

Major lack of leadership, strategy, and vision. Lack of focus for product plans. Seems like we are trying to create too many products rather than focus on the few key products needed. In other offices, it sounds like there is good work-life balance, but in our office there is not. There is an expectation from upper management to work at all times, even on holidays and vacations. Performance evaluations are not based on actual performance. No real measurement and assessment of work when you are told to give all employees "meets expectations." All employees get about the same very minimal increase (2%), which then breeds mediocrity. Last year our health care costs went up, and our increase did not even cover the increased cost of the health care. Extremely short-staffed--not enough staff for the number of products we are creating. The needs of the staff are ignored by leadership. Overall, staff morale is very low and upper management doesn't care. When these issues have been brought up by employees (and they have, and employees have tried to make things different), employees have been shot down.

1.0
Oct 31, 2013

Losing the Struggle

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Many of the folks doing the actual work are incredibly gifted and a joy to work with. There is a valiant effort in the Belmont (soon to be San Francisco) office to engage employees in social activities and fun events, such as pancake breakfasts, gourmet coffee mornings, and the occasional food truck. HR makes good attempts at providing some online and in-house training, and managers/supervisors are generally supportive of this training. (examples = leadership workshops, 401k seminars with Fidelity, etc.) It's mostly fluff, but it's free. The new office in San Francisco looks nice, and there will be some public transportation reimbursement to offset the high commuting costs for all of us in the East Bay, South Bay, and Peninsula. Benefits package includes 401k, health/dental/optical insurance.

Cons

Money - Publishing doesn't pay much in general, but Cengage pays even less than competitors. No bonuses in the past year, no cost of living increase, chapter 11 bankruptcy ongoing since July. Overworked employees - A 60-70 hour work week is typical if you're salaried, but you are shooed out the door if you are hourly and declare more than the 37.5 hours for full time. Attrition - Many people have left or are looking elsewhere because of VC mis-management, chapter 11, and low morale. Getting replacements is either impossible or the position not approved. Being over worked has become the new norm, and we're being asked for more innovation, more ideas, and more production while still producing the same number of titles and assets as before. Lofty ideas are great, but there is no one to execute. Freelancers have declined their contracts because of the bankruptcy and delays in payment. Moving to contractors - Instead of hiring full time employees, there is a movement to outsource the work to temps and contractors. The time/effort this is supposed to save gets eaten up by having to train new people every 3-6 months and check their work or redo it. Digital transition - The digital move to Mindtap will not get off the ground without engineers in the seats. The Silicon Valley area has too much competition, and engineers must be paid accordingly. They've had engineering positions open for over a year. There is no workload adjustment, the executives just want more innovation and more new things. Again there is no one to execute and our projects are delayed. Manager heavy - In each reorg in the past 18 months (most of us have lost count) there have been more managers and manager-level positions created, including the promotion of several of the previously-digital academic types. Again their teams are left without writers and replacement positions hang open for months which delays or compromises the digital products. These academics have great subject matter expertise, but are ill equipped to jump in and manage the editorial side of things. Executive decisions - Like so many huge companies, there is a serious communication gap between executive management and everyone else. What we get in town hall meetings is lip service and forced/half-hearted cheering with no facts, no concrete information (though I'd like to give them the benefit of the doubt that they seem to mean well.) Lack of promotions - Maybe because of the hiring freezes in the past 3 years, but there have only been worker-level promotions coming out of the Boston office. Belmont, Famington Hills, and Mason have seen nothing except for managers getting a bump.

2.0
Sep 18, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Work from home, excellent benefits, flexible with schedule.

Cons

Increasingly greedy due to demands from private equity firm, implemented new ordering systems which are unbelievably broken and have made customer facing positions a nightmare, sales continue to plummet along with company morale but they just squeeze harder, expect more, and tell you to be happy with what you get. Meanwhile if you're in a senior position you're probably on a chopping block. Layoffs got so out of hand they stopped sharing them. Business outlook bad. Feels like a sinking ship, not that anyone cares as long as the bottom line stays in tact.

avatar
Cengage Response
9mo
Thank you for sharing your perspective and for your more than three years of contributions at Cengage Group. We know that system changes and organizational adjustments have been challenging, and we are working hard to improve our ordering platforms and customer-facing processes so they better support our teams and customers. These transitions take time, but addressing them is a top priority. As a for-profit company, we have a responsibility to optimize results for our shareholders, just as most retirement and 401(k) funds invest in companies like ours with the expectation of sustainable returns. At the same time, we recognize that our long-term success depends on the talent and dedication of our employees. That is why we emphasize inclusion and belonging hand in hand with a merit-based culture, guided by our Credo: we are responsible to and for each other. We value your feedback as we continue to strengthen our operations and culture, and I want to thank you for your commitment during this period of change. — Michael Hansen, CEO
Viewing 169 - 171 of 2,407 Reviews

Glassdoor has 2,605 Cengage reviews submitted anonymously by Cengage employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Cengage is right for you.