Check Point Software Technologies reviews about "management"

• Less suitable for senior profiles looking for fast growth or strong technical ownership • Decision-making and development processes can be slow and highly layered • Limited room for impactful technical leadership or innovation in some teams • Career progression and recognition for senior engineers can be gradual and management-dependent • Can feel structured and rigid compared to more dynamic or product-driven environments

Outdated Management! The leadership structure is slow and resistant to modern change. Management assumes an "always been done this way" mindset, leading to unnecessary roadblocks and missed opportunities for innovation. The focus is on maintaining the status quo rather than adapting to the market. Sales Engineering team here in the us is completely stagnant, they run this team like they always have for 20 years now, & when they say "we need to modernize & change" - mgmt fires or demotes the good talent we have, but never addresses the real problem, the same people have been our "Heads of Engineering" for 15+ years & still think you need 20 years of experience to "be at their level" - what a joke. There is a persistent culture of old managers who seem to derive authority solely from seniority, rather than current expertise or forward thinking vision. Compensation is well below industry average & we are losing good talent every day. IMO the company is on it's way out, will probably be sold or acquired somehow in the next couple of years. This one won't survive the AI boom. I'm still working here, but actively looking for a way out.

Small salary, slow internal processes, not intrested in your management

Is seems that the hybrid option is reduced. There was some strange management decisions made lately that feels completely wrong from the workers perspective.

Older and outdated people in management team, with no focus on customers and only want to achieve retirement (5 to 10 years). Targets and accounts are set without a logical reason

Some of the management have a micro-management style

This company suffers from poor leadership and an outdated mindset. Learning new technologies is often discouraged because leadership prefers to keep things “the way they’ve always been,” even when that hurts growth and innovation. Employees are treated like headcount rather than people. Development, curiosity, and initiative are not genuinely supported — they’re quietly shut down. Several managers actively contribute to a toxic environment. There is a clear lack of empathy, and communication is often dismissive or outright derogatory. Respect is not part of the culture here. If you’re looking for a workplace that values people, encourages learning, and leads with professionalism, this is not it.

Alwayds chasing people to get stuff done.