DREAM reviews

3.3

67% would recommend to a friend

(138 total reviews)

Richard Berlin

59% approve of CEO

57% positive business outlook

DREAM has an employee rating of 3.3 out of 5 stars, based on 138 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The DREAM employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Nonprofit & NGO industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

138 reviews
1.0
Jun 24, 2021
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- Some teachers are offered higher pay in comparison to other schools in NYC—both private and public/charter - There is a part private, part public playground that is attached to the school. - Parents that are invested in their child’s education are really involved in the school community. - The teachers that work at Dream are the literal backbone of the school. It’s their commitment to the work that keeps the school from collapsing. - Teachers really support teachers here. It’s the friendships made that keep teachers from quitting.

Cons

- The head of schools—the woman in charge of making all decisions related to the organization—has completely removed herself from the school/classroom environment altogether. She frequently makes decisions that are massively removed from teacher and student needs, leaving teachers angry, tired and with no avenue to voice their concerns. Additionally, while her office is 40 feet from the classrooms she is in charge of running, you will never, EVER see her in any of those classrooms. This has been the case for years. She will often hold “town hall” meetings that are supposedly designed to provide a venue for teachers to voice their concerns, but will use those meetings to simply filibuster. Zoom chats were disabled during these after teachers started to use the chat to ask difficult questions at the beginning of the year. Very typically, she will recycle the same story of the one child she is familiar with to appear as though she is involved in the groundwork of the school and to pander to board members and donors (who have more decision making power than any teacher, family, or leader will ever have) - The CEO is completely disengaged from anything related to the students and culture of the school. His one and only job is to fundraise and is only visible when donors come in to tour the school. It’s a running joke between staff members that it’s unknown how he is even able to talk about the school to donors as he is so far removed from anything that happens during the school day. He may have founded the school, but that’s where his involvement in the actual inner workings of the school end. - Teachers are at the absolute bottom of the totem poll in terms of decision making power and authority. Every staff member who isn’t a teacher is assumed to be in a leadership role over teachers. Don’t bother voicing any of your concerns or ideas to leadership as their one and only goal is to ascend higher into the organization and know that the bottom line is optics and never the reality of what is happening in the classroom. - There is ZERO support for difficult to manage classrooms. The number of instructional days that are wasted due to inability to control classrooms is astonishing. There is absolutely no system of consequences for the kids. Children will often become physical with their peers and teachers with zero consequences or next steps. - The leadership team does nothing to confront reports of neglect or abuse. There are several children who we know are encountering abuse at home and who have missed dozens and dozens of school days. Despite the pleas of teachers to intervene, nothing is done. It’s up to teachers to confront these issues, alone. - The leadership staff is very young and inexperienced which leads to a lot of adult culture issues. Almost every elementary school teacher at their 1991 location left at the end of this school year due to antagonistic and low quality management. They spend their days huddled in their offices on video calls and will wander into the classrooms for observations only a few times a year. Despite this, their opinions of what children need should never be questioned by teachers. You will be actively bullied, gossiped about, and ultimately ousted from the organization if you dare speak up. Morale was particularly low this year because of the absolute ineptitude of the leadership team who are neither qualified to coach nor to lead. - There are no clear systems for communication at the school. Leadership will often make decisions and then fail to relay any of that information to teachers. This leads to a whole lot of confusion and just general disorganization. Disorganization and lack of systems are major themes at Dream. Please don’t send your child to Dream. Teachers can only do so much without any support and the head of schools does not care about the quality of management or education the children are receiving. This place is a mess. It was poorly designed and is now poorly managed. It’s a ruse of school and it’s truly a mystery how they are even able to maintain their charter, much less expand. Every teacher is miserable and has no ability to change or improve any systems whatsoever. *Special note to donors: It’s your money that is funding the expansion of this school. This is not only irresponsible, but ultimately a genuine safety concern. Talk to teachers before making a decision about whether or not you want to give money to a school. The CEOs/head of schools/principals/leaders are not reliable sources for information about how a school is truly operating. Teachers are the heart and soul of all schools—they will tell you the truth.

1.0
Jun 10, 2021

All Looks, No Substance

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

- There are some really wonderful students that deserve to have great teachers - A lot of teachers care about the students and what is best for them - Beautiful building with a nice playground -Tons of openings because a huge number of teachers are leaving

Cons

-As a whole, Dream is more focused on image than output. Looking good on the outside and expanding the network are prioritized over actually fixing challenges within the school. They have a huge team devoted to this yet no curriculum development team. This means teachers must pick up the slack and create curriculum, unit plans, scope and sequences etc. etc. from scratch on their own time because Dream refuses to purchase a curriculum. -They often "borrow" teaching methods from other networks like Success Academy and Achievement First and implement it half heartedly leading to confusion and disorganization over curriculum, school culture and, perhaps most egregiously, DEI work -Despite all the work that has been done by teachers devoted to a more equitable education, Dream leadership expects teachers to follow "Teach Like a Champion" management strategies to a school with mostly students of color. This is wildly inappropriate for a school to claims to care about social justice and SEL - It seems like over and over again, Dream puts children last, going as far as to prioritize office space over having sufficient classrooms, leading to middle school and elementary having to share classrooms and insufficient space being available for small groups and testing accommodations. -Job descriptions when you apply are unclear so when you're hired there are a lot of things on your plate you didn't initially know about - Poor handling of HR issues. If you ever have an issue don't go to HR because they won't help and might even make things worse. - Leadership often speaks to staff in a manner that is not professional enough for the work environment and contributes to low morale and confusion - There is low synergy between teachers and leadership - Management styles vary widely across leadership leading to inconsistent direction amongst different grades. Some teachers will be completely ignored while other are micromanaged -They accept students of various needs without considering if they have the resources to support them and meet their needs. --There is inconsistent behavior management expectations with some students expected to constantly "sit in SPORT with a bubble and tracking the speaker" while other students literally run around the building, throw things, harm other students, with no consequence or restorative practices - Dream has unreliable contract rollouts that seems intentional to prevent staff from leaving instead of putting the work in to make them want to stay. The school year is over in a week and teachers still don't have their offers for next year when most schools hand them out in March and April -- The system to gauge performance feels arbitrary and misaligned to payscale and very secretive because the salaries vary widely between teachers that are technically on the same place on the payscale - They are not aligned to their own maxims, and will use them to manipulate teachers like their maxim of “Dream is family” often used to guilt-trip teachers into doing more for less when they aren’t being supported by the organization. This leads to 0 work/life balance and no time for employees to spend with their actual families.

avatar
DREAM Response
5y
A Response from DREAM’s Chief Education Officer Thank you for taking the time to review DREAM on Glassdoor. We regret that your experience working at DREAM was unsatisfactory and would like to address some of the important points you raised in your review: -Curriculum development: DREAM’s curriculum development team plays a crucial role in ensuring that our children’s classroom time is guided by both rigor and joy - and we’ve recently announced some of the exciting ways in which that team is growing, including the recent appointment of a Network Director of Curriculum and Instruction who will scale and codify DREAM's curriculum work more broadly. At the same time, DREAM greatly values teacher input into curriculum and believes lessons are best executed when teachers have a voice and influence over the content. -Our education model: DREAM’s approach is unique to our schools, and rooted in the belief that children learn best when they are known, seen, and loved. The pillars of our model - rigorous academics; social-emotional learning; athletics, health, and wellness; family and community engagement - ensure that the whole child is cared for. -Classroom space: Pivoting to hybrid learning during the COVID-19 pandemic wasn’t easy for our families, and we’re proud to have reopened—and stayed open—for in-person learning as soon as it was safe to do so in Fall 2020. To that end, we repurposed office space as teaching space to allow us to accommodate as many students as possible for in-person learning. -Dedicated special education efforts: DREAM follows a co-teaching model, with two teachers per classroom to ensure that our special education students have the support they need, along with a broad range of additional onsite supports that include social workers, counselors, speech therapists, and more. 27% of our students have identified special needs, well above the New York City average - a testament to the fact that DREAM is all in, for all kids, all the time. -Compensation: DREAM is committed to offering competitive compensation, both to attract and retain the best talent, and to build greater equity into our systems and processes. This past year we re-leveled salaries for school-based staff, offered raises to all full-time staff, and began renewal offer conversations with teachers in March. -Culture: We’re proud to have noted a 21 point gain in DREAM’s net promoter score from Fall 2019 to Spring 2021, and 93% of staff reported that at work, they feel cared about as a person. We know there is always room for improvement when it comes to culture-building and transparent communication from leadership - and that the pandemic has only complicated such efforts, while making them all the more a priority for our team. Thanks again for taking the time to leave this review. We wish you all the best in your career. -Eve
1.0
Mar 9, 2019

Office Politics & Egos

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

You create close bonds with coworkers. Staff from the community hold the school together. The students are amazing and driven.

Cons

Senior Management: - Lack of racial diversity or interest in inclusion by senior leaders. Behind closed doors they make inappropriate jokes and comments related to race. - Promotions for staff that fake an alignment to management. High performers are pushed out for speaking up with integrity concerns. The board should investigate the high # of payouts for staff that report mistreatment. - Nepotism - 2 chief level leaders are married and favor their friends when hiring and promoting.

Viewing 4 - 6 of 138 Reviews

Glassdoor has 166 DREAM reviews submitted anonymously by DREAM employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if DREAM is right for you.